...
首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Hospital Readmissions After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Causes, and Cost Analysis
【24h】

Hospital Readmissions After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Causes, and Cost Analysis

机译:连续流左室辅助装置植入后的住院再入院率:发生率,原因和成本分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Statistical AnalysisResultsWe investigated the incidence and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions after continuous-flow (CF) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We also analyzed the impact of unplanned readmissions on post–CF-LVAD survival and the costs associated with each cause of readmission.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 126 patients who underwent implantation with a CF-LVAD from January 2007 to December 2013. The timing of readmissions, hospital length of stay, and total length of device support were evaluated. Patients were followed up while receiving support, until transplantation, or until death. Direct hospital costs associated with each readmission were analyzed.ResultsIn all, 103 patients underwent implantation for bridge to transplantation and 19 patients for destination therapy; 68 patients were readmitted 156 times (2.2 times/patient) as of the end of follow-up. The median follow-up period was 11 months. While receiving device support, patients spent 93% of their time out of the hospital. The causes of readmission included gastrointestinal bleeding (19%), driveline infection (13%), and stroke (8%). The median time to first readmission was 35 days. Thirty (44%) patients were readmitted within 30 days after discharge. The median direct hospital cost of a single readmission was $7,546. Device malfunction and arrhythmias were the most costly causes of readmission. There was no significant difference in long-term survival between readmitted patients and those who were not readmitted.ConclusionsGastrointestinal bleeding and CF-LVAD–related infections were the leading causes of readmission. Patients with a CF-LVAD spent 93% of their time out of hospital after implantation, and readmissions did not have a negative impact on long-term survival. New approaches to minimize these adverse events will continue to improve the efficacy and decrease the cost of CF-LVAD therapy.Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have significantly improved outcomes for patients with advanced heart failure in the past decade. They have become increasingly used for bridging to orthotopic heart transplantation and provide a reasonable quality of life with a relatively low incidence of major adverse events. Continuous-flow (CF) LVADs dominate adult durable implants, at a pace exceeding 2,000 implants per year in the United States alone [
机译:统计分析结果我们调查了连续流(CF)左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后意外住院再入院的发生率和原因。我们还分析了计划外再入院对CF-LVAD术后生存的影响以及与每个再入院原因相关的成本。方法我们回顾性回顾了2007年1月至2013年12月接受CF-LVAD植入的126例患者。评估住院时间和设备支持的总时间。在获得支持的情况下对患者进行随访,直到移植或死亡。结果:总共103例患者接受了移植至桥的移植,而19例患者接受了目的地治疗。截至随访结束,有68例患者被重新入院156次(2.2次/患者)。中位随访期为11个月。在获得设备支持的同时,患者将93%的时间都花在了医院之外。再次入院的原因包括胃肠道出血(19%),传动系感染(13%)和中风(8%)。首次再入院的中位时间为35天。出院后30天内有30名(44%)患者重新入院。单次再住院的直接医院平均费用为$ 7,546。设备故障和心律不齐是再次入院的最昂贵原因。再入院的患者和未再入院的患者的长期存活率无显着差异。结论胃肠道出血和CF-LVAD相关感染是再入院的主要原因。植入CF-LVAD的患者在植入后花费了其出院时间的93%,再次入院对长期生存没有负面影响。减少这些不良事件的新方法将继续提高CF-LVAD治疗的疗效并降低治疗费用。过去十年来,左心室辅助设备(LVAD)显着改善了晚期心力衰竭患者的预后。它们已越来越多地用于桥接原位心脏移植,并提供合理的生活质量,而主要不良事件的发生率相对较低。连续流(LV)LVAD在成人耐用植入物中占主导地位,仅在美国,每年的植入量就超过2,000 [

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号