首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Ventricular Assist Device Implant in the Elderly Is Associated With Increased, but Respectable Risk: A Multi-Institutional Study
【24h】

Ventricular Assist Device Implant in the Elderly Is Associated With Increased, but Respectable Risk: A Multi-Institutional Study

机译:老年人心室辅助装置的植入与风险增加但可观察到的风险相关:一项多机构研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Study DesignStatistical AnalysisResultsPatient Demographics and Baseline Risk ProfilesPreoperative Hemodynamics and Operative DataAdverse Events After LVAD ImplantShort-Term and Midterm SurvivalThere are an increasing number of elderly?patients with end-stage heart failure. Destination mechanical circulatory support is often the only therapy available for these patients who are not transplant candidates. The outcomes after continuous flow left ventricular?assist device (CF LVAD) implant in older patients remains unclear. We undertook this multi-institutional study to quantify short-term and midterm outcomes after CF LVAD implant in the elderly.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) national registry that underwent implant of a CF LVAD (June 2006 to April 2012). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based upon age (<70 years [n?= 4,439] and ≥70 years (n?= 590]). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed. The primary endpoint, survival, was compared between cohorts.ResultsPatients age 70 and older were more hemodynamically stable pre-VAD implant as evidenced by INTERMACS profile and inotrope dependence. Perioperative outcomes, including median bypass time (89 vs?89 minutes) and length of stay (0.657 vs 0.657 months) were similar between cohorts (p?= not significant). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant difference in 2-year survival between patients aged 70 years or greater (63%) and less than 70 (71%, p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed age as an independent predictor of mortality during follow-up (p < 0.001). Nonetheless, midterm cumulative survival in the older cohort was still reasonable (63% at 2?years).ConclusionsMulti-institutional analysis revealed advanced age as a predictor of increased mortality after CF?LVAD implantation. Careful patient selection is critical in the elderly to optimize long-term outcomes after CF LVAD implantation.CTSNet classification:27Dr Acker discloses a financial relationship with Thoratec, Inc.Mechanical circulatory support is becoming mainstream therapy for terminal heart failure. Though initially evaluated as a bridge to transplant strategy to support patients with unstable heart failure who could not survive on the wait list for a heart transplant, left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly being used for destination therapy [
机译:研究设计统计分析结果患者人口统计学和基线风险状况术前血流动力学和手术数据LVAD植入后短期和中期生存的不良事件越来越多的老年患者患有终末期心力衰竭。对于那些不是移植候选者的患者,目的地机械循环支持通常是唯一可用的疗法。老年患者连续流左室辅助装置(CF LVAD)植入后的结果仍不清楚。我们进行了这项多机构研究以量化老年人CF LVAD植入后的短期和中期结局。方法我们回顾性分析了机构间机械辅助循环支持(INTERMACS)国家注册中心中所有接受CF LVAD( 2006年6月至2012年4月)。根据年龄(<70岁[n?= 4,439]和≥70岁(n?= 590])将患者分为2组,分析术前,术中和术后变量,比较两组患者的主要终点(生存期)结果INTERMACS资料和inotrope依赖性证明70岁及70岁以上的患者在VAD植入前的血流动力学更稳定,围手术期的结果包括中位旁路时间(89 vs?89分钟)和住院时间(0.657 vs 0.657个月)相似。 Kaplan-Meier分析显示,年龄在70岁或以上(63%)和小于70岁(71%)之间的患者的2年生存率存在显着差异(71%,p <0.001)。 。多变量Cox比例风险分析显示,随访期间年龄是死亡率的独立预测因子(p <0.001),但较老队列的中期累积生存率仍是合理的(2岁时为63%)。分析显示高龄是CF?LVAD植入后死亡率增加的预测指标。 CTSNet分类:27 Acker博士披露了与Thoratec,Inc.的财务关系。机械循环支持正成为终末性心力衰竭的主流疗法。尽管最初被评估为支持不能在心脏移植等待名单上存活的不稳定心力衰竭患者的移植策略的桥梁,但左心室辅助设备(LVAD)越来越多地用于目标治疗[

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号