首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Impact of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation in Patients Treated With Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices
【24h】

Impact of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation in Patients Treated With Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices

机译:三尖瓣反流对植入式左心室辅助装置治疗患者的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The progression of tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) and the impact of preoperative TR on postoperative outcomes in patients having left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has not been studied.MethodsOne hundred seventy-six consecutive implantable LVAD procedures were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 137 patients comprised the final study group with complete preimplant characteristics, before and after echocardiogram assessment of TR, and outcomes data. Patients were divided into two groups: insignificant TR (iTR) consisting of those with preimplant TR grades of none, trace, and mild; and significant TR (sTR) consisting of those with moderate and severe TR grades.ResultsRelative to patients with iTR, patients with sTR were younger (53.6 ± 12.8 versus 58.4 ± 10.0 years, p = 0.02) and more commonly had nonischemic cardiomyopathies (69% versus 38%, p < 0.001). The preimplant incidence of iTR and sTR was 51% and 49%. Immediately after the LVAD implant procedure, TR did not significantly change. At late follow-up (156 ± 272 days), 32% had moderate or severe TR. Also, 41% of the original sTR group persisted with moderate or severe TR. Relative to patients with iTR, patients with sTR required longer postimplant intravenous inotropic support (8.5 versus 5.0 days, p = 0.02), more commonly required a temporary right ventricular assist device, and had a longer postimplant length of hospital stay (27.0 versus 20.0 days, p = 0.03). There was also a trend toward decreased survival for sTR versus iTR (log rank = 0.05).ConclusionsTricuspid regurgitation is not reduced immediately after LVAD implantation. Significant TR is associated with longer postimplant inotropic support and length of hospital stay.CTSNet classification:27, 35Drs Rogers and Milano disclose that they have financial relationships with Thoratec Corporation.Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become a more common treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure as either bridge to cardiac transplantation or permanent therapy. Newer LVADs, featuring continuous flow with either axial or centrifugal designs, have been shown to be more durable, but morbidity remains significant [
机译:尚未研究左心辅助装置(LVAD)植入患者三尖瓣关闭不全(TR)的进展以及术前TR对术后结局的影响。方法回顾性分析了176例连续的可植入LVAD程序。共有137名患者组成了最终研究组,具有完整的植入前特征,超声心动图评估TR前后,结果数据。患者分为两组:轻度TR(iTR),即植入前TR等级为无,痕量和轻度的患者。结果与iTR患者相比,sTR患者相对年轻(53.6±12.8岁对58.4±10.0岁,p = 0.02),更常见于非缺血性心肌病(69 %与38%,p <0.001)。 iTR和sTR的植入前发生率分别为51%和49%。 LVAD植入手术后,TR并未立即改变。晚期随访(156±272天),有32%的患者出现中度或重度TR。同样,原始sTR组的41%持续中度或重度TR。相对于iTR患者,sTR患者需要更长的植入后静脉正性肌力支持(8.5 vs 5.0天,p = 0.02),更常见的是需要临时的右心室辅助装置,并且植入后的住院时间更长(27.0 vs 20.0天) ,p = 0.03)。与iTR相比,sTR的存活率也有降低的趋势(log rank = 0.05)。结论LVAD植入后三尖瓣关闭不全并没有减少。 CTSNet分类:27,35 Dr Rogers和Milano透露他们与Thoratec Corporation有财务关系,植入式左心室辅助装置(LVAD)已成为患者更常见的治疗方法。终末期心力衰竭可作为心脏移植或永久治疗的桥梁。新型LVAD具有轴向或离心设计的连续流动性,已被证明具有更强的耐用性,但发病率仍然很高[

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号