Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT allows assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV), left ventricular stroke volume (SV), and left v'/> Prone Versus Supine Patient Positioning During Gated 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT: Effect on Left Ventricular Volumes, Ejection Fraction, and Heart Rate
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Prone Versus Supine Patient Positioning During Gated 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT: Effect on Left Ventricular Volumes, Ejection Fraction, and Heart Rate
【24h】

Prone Versus Supine Patient Positioning During Gated 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT: Effect on Left Ventricular Volumes, Ejection Fraction, and Heart Rate

机译:99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT门控期间俯卧位与仰卧位患者位置:对左心室容积,射血分数和心率的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

id="p-1">Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT allows assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV), left ventricular stroke volume (SV), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Acquiring images with the patient both prone and supine is an approved method of identifying and reducing artifacts. Yet prone positioning alters physiologic conditions. This study investigated how prone versus supine patient positioning during gated SPECT affects EDV, ESV, SV, LVEF, and heart rate. >Methods: Forty-eight patients scheduled for routine myocardial perfusion imaging were examined with gated 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT (at rest) while positioned prone and supine (consecutively, in random order). All parameters for both acquisitions were calculated using the commercially available QGS algorithm. >Results: Whereas EDV and SV were significantly lower (P 0.0004) for prone acquisitions (EDV, 110.5 ?± 39.1 mL; SV, 55.9 ?± 13.3 mL) than for supine acquisitions (EDV, 116.9 ?± 36.2 mL; SV, 61.0 ?± 14.5 mL), ESV and LVEF did not differ significantly. Heart rate was significantly higher (P 0.0001) during prone acquisitions (69.1 ?± 10.5 mina?’1) than during supine acquisitions (66.5 ?± 10.0 mina?’1). >Conclusion: The observed position-dependent effect on EDV, SV, and heart rate might be explained by decreased arterial filling and increased sympathetic nerve activity. Hence, supine reference data should not be used to classify the results of prone acquisitions.
机译:id =“ p-1”>门控心肌灌注SPECT可以评估左室舒张末期容积(EDV),左室收缩末期容积(ESV),左室卒中容积(SV)和左室射血分数(LVEF)。通过患者俯卧和仰卧获取图像是一种公认​​的识别和减少伪影的方法。然而,俯卧位会改变生理状况。这项研究调查了门控SPECT期间俯卧与仰卧患者的定位如何影响EDV,ESV,SV,LVEF和心率。 >方法:对计划进行常规心肌灌注显像的48例患者进行了门控 99m Tc-司他他比SPECT(静息)检查,俯卧和仰卧(连续,随机) )。使用市售的QGS算法计算两次采集的所有参数。 >结果:俯卧获取(EDV,110.5±±39.1 mL; SV,55.9±±13.3 mL)的EDV和SV显着降低( P <0.0004)仰卧位(EDV,116.9±±36.2 mL; SV,61.0±±14.5 mL),ESV和LVEF无显着差异。俯卧获取(69.1±±10.5 min a?'1 )的心率显着高于仰卧获取(66.5±±10.0 min P <0.0001) > a?'1 )。 >结论:观察到的对EDV,SV和心率的位置依赖性效应可能是由于动脉充盈减少和交感神经活动增加所致。因此,仰卧参考数据不应用于对俯卧获取的结果进行分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号