首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >It's Not All in Your Head: Viewing Graduate Medical Education Through the Lens of Situated Cognition
【24h】

It's Not All in Your Head: Viewing Graduate Medical Education Through the Lens of Situated Cognition

机译:这并不全在您的脑海:通过情境认知的视角看研究生医学教育

获取原文
       

摘要

Consider the last time you sat down to begin a complex activity, such as writing a scientific article or crafting a persuasive letter to a colleague. When you started did you have, in your head, an exact outline of what you wanted to say and then transferred those ideas, verbatim, to your word-processing software? Or did you have a general idea of the topics you wanted to cover and, as you began writing, saw your text emerge as you typed and interacted with the software? In other words, did your final written document go directly from your brain to the virtual paper or did that text materialize as you wrote, revised what you wrote, and copied and pasted different sections of your text? If you are like me, the latter is a more accurate description of how complex activities, such as writing, occur in practice. Now think about your last patient encounter, and ask yourself this same question: did you know ahead of time exactly what you wanted to say and do in the encounter, or did those details emerge in the context of the doctor-patient interaction? Although there is limited empirical evidence, I would argue that similar to writing and other complex human activities, most clinical encounters are dynamic events that emerge as doctors and patients interact in a clinical environment. The processes described above can be explained by different theories of human learning. The fairly straightforward notion of taking a fully formed idea in one's head and transferring it to the virtual paper is closely related to an information processing description of how humans think and learn. In contrast, the description of a dynamic interaction between a whole person and his environment is closely linked to a quite different theory of how humans think and learn: situated cognition. The purpose of this editorial is to (1) describe situated cognition and contrast it to more traditional information processing theories, and (2) consider how situated cognition theory can be applied to teaching, learning, and research in graduate medical education (GME).;Situated Cognition Versus Information Processing Theory (table) View larger version (34K) TableInformation Processing Theory Versus Situated Cognition Theory;Learning From a Situated Perspective To understand learning, sitcog theorists always consider 2 components: the person and the context. From this perspective, knowledge and intelligence are conceptualized as the interaction between the person and the context, and consequently, sitcog theorists place equal emphasis on the person and environment.2 Knowledge is conceptualized as being located in the actions of individuals or groups of individuals and evolves as we work our way through new situations. In real-world situations knowledge is not solely contained within a single individual or group of individuals. Instead, knowledge is distributed throughout the environment in people, computers, books, and other tools or instruments.2 Additionally, “each individual's goals, values, and beliefs interact with these distributed sources of information, so that each person's experience in the situation is unique.”2(p46);Implications for Teaching and Research in GME The primary instructional implication of a sitcog perspective is that all learning should be situated in authentic contexts. Contexts are truly “authentic” if they share some of the important aspects of real-world problems, including being ill structured, having complex goals, and containing collaborative activities among learners and practitioners in society.2 Problem-based learning environments, such as those used in some medical schools, are examples of sitcog theory in practice. Moreover, almost all clinical teaching takes place in an authentic environment, within clinics, hospitals, and medical centers. In these settings an apprenticeship model of teaching and learning is an instructional exemplar of a sitcog perspective.6 Problem-based learning activities and apprenticeships give trainees the op
机译:考虑一下您上一次坐下来进行一项复杂活动的时间,例如撰写科学文章或撰写给同事的说服力信。当您开始时,脑海中已经有了您想说的确切轮廓,然后将这些想法逐字地转移到了文字处理软件中?还是您对要涵盖的主题有一个大致的了解,并且在开始编写时看到键入和与该软件进行交互时出现的文字?换句话说,您的最终书面文件是直接从您的大脑转到虚拟纸张,还是在您撰写,修改所撰写的内容以及复制和粘贴文本的不同部分时实现了该文本?如果您像我一样,后者可以更准确地描述实践中复杂活动(例如写作)的发生方式。现在,考虑一下您上一次与病人的相遇,并问自己同样的问题:您是否事先知道您想在相遇中说什么和要做什么,还是这些细节是在医患互动的情况下出现的?尽管经验证据有限,但我认为与写作和其他复杂的人类活动类似,大多数临床遭遇都是动态事件,随着医生和患者在临床环境中的相互作用而出现。可以通过人类学习的不同理论来解释上述过程。将一个完整的想法付诸实践,然后将其转移到虚拟纸张这一相当简单的想法与人们对思维和学习方式的信息处理描述密切相关。相比之下,对整个人与周围环境之间动态互动的描述与人类思维和学习的另一种完全不同的理论紧密联系:情境认知。这篇社论的目的是(1)描述情境认知并将其与更传统的信息处理理论进行对比,(2)考虑如何将情境认知理论应用于研究生医学教育(GME)的教学,研究。 ;情景认知与信息处理理论(表)查看大图(34K)表信息处理理论与情境认知理论;从情境角度学习要理解学习,情景逻辑理论家总是考虑两个组成部分:人和情境。从这个角度来看,知识和智力被概念化为人与环境之间的相互作用,因此,情景逻辑理论家对人和环境给予了同等重视。2知识被概念化为位于个人或个人群体的行为中,并且随着我们在新形势下的努力而发展。在现实世界中,知识不仅仅包含在一个人或一组人中。相反,知识是在人,计算机,书籍和其他工具或工具中分布在整个环境中的。2另外,“每个人的目标,价值和信念都与这些分布的信息源相互作用,因此每个人在这种情况下的经验都是2(p46);对GME的教学和研究的启示情景逻辑观点的主要指导意义是所有学习都应置于真实的语境中。如果上下文具有现实世界中问题的一些重要方面,包括结构错乱,目标复杂以及包含社会中学习者和从业者之间的协作活动,那么它们就是真正的“真实”。2基于问题的学习环境,例如那些在一些医学院中使用的西提克理论在实践中就是示例。此外,几乎所有的临床教学都在真实的环境中进行,包括诊所,医院和医疗中心。在这种情况下,学徒制的教学模式就是情景学习的指导性典范。6基于问题的学习活动和学徒制为学员提供了机会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号