...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Recognizing and Alleviating Moral Distress Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents
【24h】

Recognizing and Alleviating Moral Distress Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents

机译:认识和减轻妇产科居民的道德困扰

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

What was known Moral distress after clinical encounters can contribute to unsafe or poor-quality patient care and reduced job satisfaction.;What is new Focus groups with obstetrics-gynecology residents confirm presence of moral distress, originating from the difficult clinical encounters and moral dilemmas that are regularly experienced.;Limitations Small sample size limits generalizability.;Bottom line Educators should recognize moral distress in residents to promote improved resident well-being and professional development.;Introduction Obstetrics and gynecology residents who have to cope with difficult patient encounters struggle to prevent the disintegration of the therapeutic relationship and the accompanying feelings of moral distress. Moral distress, often cited in nursing literature, has not been adequately explored in graduate medical education and physician practice. “[M]oral distress is [defined as] when one knows the right thing to do, but institutional constraints make it nearly impossible to pursue the right course of action.”1 Moral distress after clinical encounters, along with moral dilemmas, has been implicated in emotional distress, unsafe or poor-quality patient care, reduced job satisfaction, and attrition in nursing.2–6 An extensive literature identifies the “difficult” patient and common characteristics and behaviors that compromise the therapeutic relationship, such as social class, occupation or employment status, appearance, age, cleanliness, and attire.7–11 Previous studies confirm the characterizations of difficult patients and, more broadly, difficult clinical encounters. However, there is a gap in the literature identifying moral distress among residents and its recognition and alleviation in residency education. We examined how residents characterize difficult clinical encounters, the emotional responses to these encounters, and how judgments about patients are formulated, confirmed, or modified. By delving into what residents thought and felt about difficult clinical encounters, we identified that moral distress is correlated to unresolved situations or issues within those encounters. Finally, we recommend how residency education can provide obstetrics-gynecology residents with the tools to understand and resolve difficult encounters, ultimately alleviating their moral distress.;Methods The authors developed open-ended focus group questions after conducting an extensive literature review about moral distress, difficult patient encounters, and gaps in obstetrics-gynecology resident education. One of the authors (J.A.) teaches in the residency programs at 2 of the 3 hospitals and regularly conducts clinical ethics consults (during which moral distress is often expressed by providers), serves as a member of an ethics committee, and is known to some of the residents who participated in this study. The authors facilitated 3 focus groups with 31 obstetrics-gynecology residents from 2 urban programs and 1 rural program. All are community-based, focusing on the care of underserved populations. Participants were invited via e-mail and in-person meetings. With the exception of postcall residents, nearly all of the residents from the 3 programs participated. Residents were diverse in level of training, sex, and race/ethnicity. Focus groups had 7 to 14 participants (a total of 23 women and 8 men) and were conducted in a private setting. Focus groups lasted up to 60 minutes. Beyond the sex of participants, no other demographic information was recorded to protect their confidentiality and the residency program in which they train. Participants were asked questions designed to encourage the expression of beliefs, feelings, and experiences surrounding difficult patient encounters, moral distress, and the process of making moral and nonmoral judgments. Digital recordings of the focus groups were transcribed verbatim by the second author and qualitatively evaluated using thematic analysis to determine repetitive
机译:所谓的临床遭遇后的精神困扰可能导致不安全或质量差的患者护理并降低工作满意度。什么是新的产科和妇科住院医师焦点小组确认存在精神困扰,这源于艰难的临床遭遇和道德困境,局限性;小样本量限制了推广性;底线教育工作者应认识到居民的道德困境,以促进居民的福祉和职业发展。简介必须应对困难的患者的妇产科居民努力预防治疗关系的瓦解以及随之而来的道德苦恼。在护理医学文献中经常提到的道德困扰在研究生医学教育和医师实践中尚未得到充分探讨。 “ [道德困扰]被定义为:当人们知道做正确的事时,但是制度上的限制使得几乎不可能采取正确的行动。” 1临床遭遇后的道德困扰,以及道德上的困境,一直是涉及情绪困扰,不安全或质量较差的患者护理,工作满意度降低和护理人员流失。2-6大量文献确定了“难治”患者以及危害治疗关系的共同特征和行为,例如社会阶层,职业或就业状况,外观,年龄,清洁度和着装。7-11先前的研究证实了困难患者的特征,更广泛地说,是临床遭遇的困难。但是,在文献中发现居民道德困境及其在居民教育中的认可和缓解方面存在差距。我们研究了居民如何表征困难的临床遭遇,对这些遭遇的情感反应,以及如何制定,确认或修改对患者的判断。通过深入研究居民对困难的临床遭遇的想法和感受,我们确定了道德困扰与这些遭遇中未解决的情况或问题相关。最后,我们建议住院医生教育如何为妇产科居民提供工具,帮助他们理解和解决困难,最终减轻他们的道德困扰。;方法作者在对道德困扰进行了广泛的文献综述之后,提出了开放性的焦点小组问题,困难的患者遭遇,以及妇产科住院医师教育方面的空白。作者之一(JA)在3家医院中的2家在住院医师项目中任教,并定期进行临床伦理咨询(在此期间,医护人员经常表达道德上的困扰),担任伦理委员会的成员,并为某些人所知参与这项研究的居民作者协助了来自2个城市计划和1个农村计划的31位妇产科住院医师的3个焦点小组。所有这些都是基于社区的,重点是对服务不足的人群的照顾。通过电子邮件和现场会议邀请了参与者。除召集居民外,这3个计划的几乎所有居民都参加了会议。居民的培训水平,性别和种族/民族各不相同。焦点小组有7至14名参与者(总共23名女性和8名男性),是在私人环境下进行的。焦点小组长达60分钟。除了参与者的性别外,没有记录其他任何人口统计学信息,以保护他们的机密性和他们培训所在的居住计划。向参与者询问旨在鼓励围绕困难患者遭遇,道德困扰以及做出道德和非道德判断的过程的信念,感受和经历的表达的问题。第二作者逐字记录焦点小组的数字记录,并使用主题分析对定性进行定性评估以确定重复性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号