...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Impact of an Anesthesiology Rotation on Subsequent Endotracheal Intubation Success
【24h】

Impact of an Anesthesiology Rotation on Subsequent Endotracheal Intubation Success

机译:麻醉学旋转对随后气管插管成功的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

What was known Added opportunities to perform endotracheal intubation (ETI) during residency may result in improved emergency medicine (EM) resident success for this procedure.;What is new An additional anesthesiology rotation for EM residents increases the number of opportunities to perform ETI.;Limitations Single-site study and small sample size limit generalizability, as well as possible reporting bias from faculty raters.;Bottom line The additional anesthesiology rotation did not have a significant effect on residents' ETI success or adverse event rates.;Introduction Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is an essential skill for emergency department (ED) physicians. Emergency medicine (EM) residents gain experience with ETI throughout their training. A large multicenter study reported high levels of EM resident success with ETI.1 As residents perform more ETIs, their success rate, commonly defined as first- or second-attempt successful passage of the endotracheal tube, should improve. One study defined the “learning curve” for ETI success rate at 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–0.99) after a median of 57 ETI attempts.2 Another report suggested that postgraduate year (PGY)-1 residents completing a 1-month anesthesiology rotation required approximately 19 intubation attempts to complete the learning curve.3 The learning curve for paramedic students with a success rate of 96% was reported at a median of 30 ETI attempts.4 These studies show considerable variation in the learning curve among individual trainees and the different environments for intubations, including the emergency department, operating room, prehospital setting, and intensive care unit. The EM residency programs must consider the number of intubation opportunities for their residents, residents' projected learning curve, and variations in the potential for learning among potential intubation environments. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recommends a minimum of 35 ETI attempts during EM residency, but there is no way to determine the ideal number of ETI attempts for a given EM resident. The ED, the intensive care unit, and the operating room are common clinical venues for EM residents to gain ETI experience. To increase the number of intubation opportunities provided to residents, approximately 87% of US allopathic EM residencies have a required anesthesiology rotation. Most of these rotations are conducted in PGY-1, with 55% being 4-week rotations and 45% being less than 4?weeks or hybrid rotations.5 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing a PGY-1 anesthesiology rotation on residents' ETI success in the ED during PGY-2. We hypothesized that residents who had an anesthesiology rotation during PGY-1 would be more successful and have less adverse events with ETI during the first 6?months of PGY-2 than would residents who did not experience such a rotation.;Methods Study Setting and Design We conducted a prospective, observational study that compared ETI success rates and adverse events of 2 resident groups in the Indiana University EM residency program during the first 6?months of their PGY-2. Residents in the study group (N ?=? 18) participated in a 4-week anesthesiology rotation (AR) in PGY-1, which replaced a radiology rotation. Control group residents (N ?=? 17) did not have a PGY-1 anesthesiology rotation (NO-AR). Information about ETIs performed by the 2 groups during the study was recorded by faculty on Airway Cards. All ETIs performed during the study occurred in the ED at the residency's 2 urban, level-1 trauma centers.;Results Analysis of self-maintained procedure logs suggested the AR group had a mean of 53 ETI attempts per resident in PGY-1, and the NO-AR group had a mean of 21 ETI attempts per resident during PGY-1 (table?1). View larger version (10K) table 1Resident Demographics;Discussion The study group residents' additional ETI experience during a PGY-1, anesthesiology, 4-week rotatio
机译:已知在住院期间增加进行气管插管(ETI)的机会可能会改善此过程中急诊医学(EM)居民的成功率。新内容EM居民额外的麻醉药轮换增加了进行ETI的机会。局限性单点研究和小样本量限制了推广性,以及教师评分者可能的报告偏见。;底线额外的麻醉学轮换对居民的ETI成功率或不良事件发生率没有显着影响。;气管插管( ETI)是急诊科(ED)医生的一项基本技能。急诊医学(EM)居民在整个培训过程中都会获得有关ETI的经验。一项大型的多中心研究报告说,EM居民在ETI方面的成功率很高。1随着居民进行更多ETI,其成功率(通常被定义为气管插管第一次或第二次成功通过)应会提高。一项研究将ETI成功率的“学习曲线”定义为中值57次ETI尝试后的90%(95%置信区间[CI],0.80–0.99)。2另一报告表明,研究生(PGY)-1居民完成了1个月的麻醉轮换需要大约19次插管尝试才能完成学习曲线。3据报道,中途进行30次ETI尝试,医务人员的学习曲线成功率为96%。4这些研究表明学习过程中存在很大差异各个学员和急诊室,手术室,院前环境和重症监护室等不同插管环境之间的关系曲线。 EM居住计划必须考虑居民的插管机会数量,居民的预计学习曲线以及潜在插管环境之间学习潜力的变化。研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)建议在EM居住期间至少进行35次ETI尝试,但是无法确定给定EM居民的理想ETI尝试次数。急诊室,重症监护室和手术室是EM居民获得ETI经验的常见临床场所。为了增加提供给居民的插管机会,美国约有87%的同种异体EM住院医师需要进行麻醉轮换。这些轮换大多在PGY-1中进行,其中55%为4周轮换,45%为少于4周或混合轮换。5本研究的目的是评估实施PGY-1麻醉的效果。在PGY-2期间轮换居民急诊室ETI成功。我们假设在PGY-1期间进行麻醉轮换的居民比在没有进行这种轮换的居民中更成功,并且在PGY-2的前6个月对ETI的不良事件更少。设计我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,比较了印第安纳大学EM居住计划中两个居民群体在PGY-2的前六个月的ETI成功率和不良事件。研究组(N≥18)的居民参加了PGY-1的4周麻醉轮换(AR),该轮换代替了放射轮换。对照组居民(N≥17)没有进行PGY-1麻醉旋转(NO-AR)。两组在研究期间进行的有关ETI的信息均由教师在气道卡上记录。研究期间执行的所有ETI都发生在居民区2个城市1级创伤中心的ED中。结果分析自备程序日志显示,AR组在PGY-1中平均每个居民有53次ETI尝试,并且在PGY-1期间,NO-AR组平均每位居民有21次ETI尝试(表1)。查看大图(10K)表1居民人口统计学;讨论该研究组在PGY-1,麻醉,4周轮换期间居民的额外ETI经验

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号