首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Thinking on the Front Line: Understanding Resident Decision Making in Clinical Practice
【24h】

Thinking on the Front Line: Understanding Resident Decision Making in Clinical Practice

机译:在第一线思考:在临床实践中了解居民决策

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Clinical reasoning is foundational to medical practice, but the cognitive processes involved have been difficult to elucidate. Attention has been paid to cognitive biases and their role in diagnostic errors, but less attention has focused on the processes underlying successful diagnosis. We aimed to elucidate the factors associated with successful resident physician clinical decision making to support clinical reasoning in training programs. Methods: We applied a qualitative research framework based on grounded theory. We interviewed 11 postgraduate year 2 internal medicine residents, probing their descriptions of successful diagnoses. Data collection and analysis occurred in an iterative fashion and a constant comparison process was employed for analysis. Identified themes were used to develop theory regarding resident physician clinical reasoning. Results: We identified 4 major themes. Resident attitude, clinical skills, and thorough assessment contribute to their diagnostic success (Mechanics). This is further facilitated by resident factors (curiosity, sense of duty, level of training) and contextual factors (timing of assessment, validation by colleagues; Facilitators). Experience with successful decision making contributes to increased confidence in their abilities and perceived improved reasoning (Outcomes), and we also identified barriers to diagnostic success (Barriers). Conclusions: There are specific methods used by residents to achieve diagnostic success that incorporate the CanMEDS roles of Medical Expert, Professional, and Scholar. Residents reflect on successes to further improve their clinical competence. This process occurs independently of their training program or supervising physician. Future studies should explore whether application of these methods and minimizing the identified barriers improves diagnostic success.
机译:简介:临床推理是医学实践的基础,但是所涉及的认知过程一直难以阐明。注意力已经转移到认知偏见及其在诊断错误中的作用,但较少的注意力集中在成功诊断的基础过程上。我们旨在阐明与成功的住院医师临床决策相关的因素,以支持培训计划中的临床推理。方法:我们应用了基于扎根理论的定性研究框架。我们采访了11名2年级研究生的内科住院医师,探讨了他们对成功诊断的描述。数据收集和分析以迭代的方式进行,并且采用恒定的比较过程进行分析。确定的主题用于发展有关住院医师临床推理的理论。结果:我们确定了4个主要主题。居民的态度,临床技能和全面评估有助于他们的诊断成功(机械学)。居民因素(好奇心,责任感,培训水平)和背景因素(评估时机,同事的确认;协助者)进一步促进了这一点。成功决策的经验有助于增强人们对其能力的信心,并能改善推理能力(成果),我们还确定了诊断成功的障碍(障碍)。结论:居民采用了一些特定的方法来实现诊断成功,这些方法结合了医学专家,专家和学者的CanMEDS角色。居民对成功进行了反思,以进一步提高他们的临床能力。此过程独立于他们的培训计划或指导医生进行。未来的研究应探索这些方法的应用和最小化已发现的障碍是否可以提高诊断成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号