...
【24h】

What's the Work?

机译:什么工作?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Let Me Heal: The Opportunity to Preserve Excellence in American Medicine is the third (but, one hopes, not the final) volume in a history of medical education in America by Kenneth Ludmerer, the unchallenged doyen of this essential area of scholarship. His two previous volumes are titled Learning to Heal (1996), which examined the structure, content, evolution, and purpose of medical education in America from its beginnings to the 1920s, and Time to Heal (1999), which described the years from the 1920s to 1994, the span he considers to cover both the rise and subsequent gradual fall of academic medicine's finest teaching, research, and scholarship. The title of his newest work is, I believe, a supplication to those agencies (the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and specialty certifying boards) now “in charge” of 21st-century resident education, to decrease the imposition on teaching medical hospitals of more rules, regulations, and mandatory content that, in their accumulating requirements, take residents away from actual patient interaction. He also appeals in his title for a respite from the concurrent gradual erosion of patient-centeredness and faculty engagement with residents. These have resulted from the commercial business environment of “rapid throughput” care and an increasing dominance of procedures and diagnostic-therapeutic technology over the past several decades. The focus on procedures and technology brings in money, but it concurrently diminishes faculty time with residents and impedes the physician-in-training from seeing himself or herself as a principal diagnostic and therapeutic instrument. Ludmerer, both an accomplished historian and a clinically active physician-teacher attending to patients, writes his latest book in his habitually engaging style, a mélange of evidentiary scholarship and personal experiences and opinions by residents, their faculty, and program directors. His text is rich in stories, and his “footnotes” (which I enjoyed very much) are a combination of published references, memorable anecdotes, and supplemental commentary to his text. His conviction is that the residency, as he says in his preface to Let Me Heal, is the “dominant formative influence” in the making of a physician. The genesis of Let Me Heal began in earnest, as he tells it, when he was a member of the Institute of Medicine's Committee on Optimizing Graduate Medical Trainee (Resident) Hours and Work Schedules to Improve Patient Safety. It seemed to him too simple a solution to a set of far more complex environmental influences than those arising from resident physical fatigue. This simplified focus might not only divert attention away from, but even augment, more dire changes in the educational environment of residents by requiring them to “get the work done” in less time and, concurrently, causing them to lose the sense of “ownership” and responsibility for their patients, already threatened by the pressures of rapid throughput. Ludmerer's concern about this issue reminded me of a particularly conscientious and empathetic senior medical resident I spoke to as he was in the process of admitting a man to our General Medicine Ward team. He said he had been paged by the discharge planner within minutes of his arrival at the patient's bedside. She wanted him to tell her when the patient could be discharged. She went on to say that, since the patient was indigent, my resident should just “get the work done” and get the patient out of the hospital, as quickly as possible. He then asked me the essential question: “What is the work?” In my academic university teaching hospital, as well as many (most?) others, the pressure on faculty to spend more and more time doing procedures (which bring in the most money) is very great. We have even created a promotional ladder especially for them, in which their RVUs (Relative Value Units)—how much money they bring in—are prominently listed as part of the merit packages subm
机译:让我自愈:保留美国医学卓越成就的机会是肯尼思·卢德默尔(Kenneth Ludmerer)在美国医学教育史上的第三卷(但没有希望,但不是最终的),这是奖学金这一不可缺少的领域。他的前两卷名为《学习治愈》(1996年),该书研究了从开始到1920年代美国医学教育的结构,内容,演变和目的,以及《治愈时代》(1999年),该书描述了医学教育的年代。从1920到1994年,他认为跨度既涵盖了学术医学最好的教学,研究和奖学金的兴起,也涵盖了其后的逐渐衰落。我相信,他最新作品的标题是对那些现在“负责” 21世纪居民教育的机构(研究生医学教育认可委员会和专业认证委员会)的一种要求,以减少对教学医院的强制性更多的规则,法规和强制性内容,在其累积的要求中,使患者远离实际的患者互动。他还呼吁在标题中寻求喘息的机会,因为病人中心和教师与居民之间的互动逐渐受到侵蚀。这些是由于过去几十年中“快速通量”护理的商业商业环境以及越来越多的程序和诊断治疗技术所致。对过程和技术的关注会带来收益,但同时会减少与住院医师的交流时间,并阻碍了接受培训的医生将自己视为主要的诊断和治疗工具。 Ludmerer既是一位经验丰富的历史学家,又是一位积极主动地为患者服务的临床医师老师,他以惯有的参与风格,证据奖学金的混合物以及居民,其教职员工和项目主管的个人经验和观点来撰写他的最新著作。他的文章内容丰富,他的“脚注”(我非常喜欢)结合了已发表的参考文献,令人难忘的轶事和对他的文章的补充评论。他坚信,正如他在《让我医治》序言中所说的那样,住院医师是医生制造过程中的“主要形成性影响”。正如他所说,“让我治愈”的起源始于他是医学研究所优化研究生医学生(住院医师)时数和工作时间表以改善患者安全的委员会成员。在他看来,解决一系列比居民身体疲劳引起的环境影响更为复杂的方法太简单了。这种简化的重点可能不仅要求居民在更短的时间内“完成工作”,而且将注意力转移到居民的教育环境上,甚至加剧了更为严峻的变化,同时使他们失去了“所有权”感以及对患者的责任,已经受到快速通量压力的威胁。 Ludmerer对这个问题的担忧使我想起了一位特别尽责且善解人意的高级医疗住院医师,他正在接受一名男子加入我们的General Medicine Ward团队。他说,出院计划员到达病人床头后几分钟,就对他进行了传呼。她想让他告诉她病人何时可以出院。她接着说,由于患者是贫困的,我的住院医师应该“完成工作”,并尽快将患者送出医院。然后,他问了我一个基本问题:“做什么工作?”在我的学术大学教学医院以及许多其他医院中,教师花费越来越多的时间进行程序(带来最多的钱)的压力非常大。我们甚至为他们创建了一个促销阶梯,在其中,他们的RVU(相对价值单位)(他们带来了多少钱)被列为优待项目的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号