...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Continuity of Care in the Training Environment: Anesthesiology Residency in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting
【24h】

Continuity of Care in the Training Environment: Anesthesiology Residency in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting

机译:培训环境中护理的连续性:门诊手术环境中的麻醉学住院医师

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

What was known Anesthesiology residents acquire clinical skills from experience in anesthesia management, with continuity of cases allowing preparation and optimal learning.;What is new Slightly more than one-half of cases were started and finished by the originally scheduled resident and attending physician.;Limitations Single-site study limits generalizability, with potential underreporting of some transitions; outcomes are limited to instances of discontinuity, not their effect on patient care or learning.;Bottom line Transitions of care in anesthesia provision reduce continuity and fragment supervision, with both potentially reducing learning.;Introduction Providing anesthesia to patients undergoing procedural cases serves as the primary medium for learning in anesthesiology—each assignment requires patient assessment, formulation, and execution of an anesthetic plan, general medical management, response to the unexpected, returning the patient to homeostasis, and finally, handing off care. Residents move toward autonomy as they are assessed, and supervision is correspondingly reduced throughout these sequential steps. Preparatory study and discussion specific to assigned patients and their surgical procedures allows for application of new knowledge. However, changes to the surgical schedule on the day of surgery may result in the reassignment of cases. In addition, residents may provide anesthesia for patients and surgical procedures other than those anticipated. Finally, if the anesthesiology resident or attending physician is relieved midway through a case, the pairing and potential for discussion and longitudinal feedback is disrupted. With frequent movement of anesthesia providers, less study is followed by application, supervision is provided for shorter periods, and patient interactions during residency become more fragmented. Ambulatory surgery now dominates surgical volume, and the discipline of operating room (OR) management has emerged1–3 to inform optimal use of ORs by, for example, reassigning patients to different anesthesia teams as the day evolves to avoid delays or unused OR time. The OR management literature typically defines optimization in terms of use and bed occupancy, without measurement of, or regard for, provider movements or continuity.4–9 With rare exceptions, anesthesia providers are assumed to be interchangeable.10,11 In addition to schedule changes, the common practice of handoffs in the OR means that residents may induce anesthesia for a patient but not be present for their emergence from anesthesia. Within the anesthesia literature, fluid staffing is acknowledged, but quantitative descriptions are sparse.12–14 The effect of fluid staffing on resident learning and patient outcomes has received little study. Duty hour regulations have necessitated increased handoffs in general, but its extent is specific to a specialty and has not, to our knowledge, been studied for anesthesiology.15,16 In this study, we measured anesthesia provider movements at a single teaching institution. A further aim was to quantify the contribution of duty hour regulations toward resident movements specifically.;Methods This prospective, observational study compared originally scheduled anesthesiology patient assignments with actual patient assignments to identify changes before and after the initiation of care. The study included all procedural cases staffed by the Department of Anesthesiology for a 5-week period, Monday through Friday, in a 500-bed university medical center. The only excluded location was the obstetrics unit. For each day in the study, we recorded the surgical schedule as published from the day before, listing all originally scheduled “cases”: the originally scheduled patients, surgeons, and procedures, as well as the anesthesia providers and scheduled ORs. After the day of surgery, we obtained a list of the cases actually performed, from OR tracking software. Electronic anesthesia health records were
机译:已知的麻醉科住院医师从麻醉管理方面的经验中获得临床技能,病例的连续性允许进行准备和最佳学习。新内容最初预定的住院医师和主治医师开始和完成的病例略多于一半。局限性单点研究限制了推广性,某些过渡可能被低估。结果仅限于不连续的情况,而不是对患者护理或学习的影响。底线麻醉中的护理过渡会减少连续性和碎片监督,而这两者都可能会减少学习。简介为接受手术的患者提供麻醉是麻醉学的主要学习媒介-每次分配都需要患者评估,制定和执行麻醉计划,一般医疗管理,应对意外情况,使患者恢复体内平衡,最后进行护理。居民在进行评估时会走向自治,在这些连续的步骤中相应地减少了监督。针对指定患者及其手术程序的专门研究和讨论允许应用新知识。但是,在手术当天更改手术时间表可能会导致重新分配病例。此外,居民可为患者和手术程序提供麻醉,但预期之外。最后,如果在病例中途解除麻醉医师或主治医师的治疗,则讨论和纵向反馈的配对和潜力将受到干扰。随着麻醉提供者的频繁移动,较少的研究随后是应用,在较短的时期内提供监督,并且在住院期间患者之间的相互作用变得更加分散。如今,门诊手术占据了手术量的主导地位,并且出现了手术室(OR)管理原则1-3,以告知最佳的OR使用方法,例如,随着一天的发展将患者重新分配给不同的麻醉小组,以避免延迟或未使用的OR时间。手术室管理文献通常在使用和床位方面进行了优化,而没有衡量或考虑服务提供者的移动或连续性。4-9除了极少数例外,麻醉服务提供者被认为是可互换的。10,11发生变化时,手术室中的越区​​切换的常规做法意味着居民可能会为患者诱发麻醉,但不会因麻醉而出现。在麻醉学文献中,流体分配被公认,但定量描述很少。12-14流体分配对住院医师学习和患者预后的影响尚未得到研究。值班规定通常需要增加交接量,但是其范围是特定专业的,并且据我们所知,尚未针对麻醉学进行研究。15,16在本研究中,我们在单个教学机构中测量了麻醉提供者的动作。方法的另一个目的是具体量化工作时间规则对居民出行的贡献。方法该前瞻性,观察性研究比较了原定的麻醉科患者分配与实际患者分配,以识别护理开始前后的变化。该研究包括了麻醉科在周一到周五在一个拥有500张病床的大学医学中心进行的为期5周的所有程序性病例。唯一被排除的位置是妇产科。对于研究中的每一天,我们记录前一天发布的手术时间表,列出所有最初预定的“病例”:最初预定的患者,外科医生和操作程序,以及麻醉提供者和预定的OR。手术当天结束后,我们从OR跟踪软件获得了实际执行的病例清单。分别进行电子麻醉健康记录

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号