...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Will Automation Improve Transitions of Care?
【24h】

Will Automation Improve Transitions of Care?

机译:自动化会改善护理的过渡吗?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

On July 1, 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented new limits on resident duty hour restrictions to address concerns about patient safety. Extensive scientific data demonstrated decreased performance in fatigued individuals, with shifts exceeding 12 to 16 consecutive hours deemed unsafe.1 In the aftermath of the new limits on continuous duty for first-year residents, their effect on patient safety and resident satisfaction is largely unknown, and early evidence suggests no improvement.2 A systematic review by Ahmed et al3 of 135 articles evaluating the impact of the duty hour limits on patient mortality demonstrated no overall improvement in patient outcomes. Some studies included in the review suggest increased complication rates in high-acuity patients. In addition to questionable safety improvements, research has found negative performance on certification examinations.3 The limits on continuous duty for first-year residents have resulted in a larger number of transitions of care,4 commonly known as handoffs. Critical information may be lost in this transition, with a negative effect on patient care. Important factors in effective handoffs include face-to-face communication, opportunities to ask questions, private handoff locations, accompanying written documentation, nondistracting environments, and minimization of interruptions.5 An accurate, concise document containing a synopsis of the patient, along with pertinent results, tasks, and conditional action statements, is a vital tool to increase the effectiveness of these transitions of care. Creating such a document requires daily updating and revision, which can be challenging given time constraints. To our knowledge, errors and discrepancies in electronic health record data related to handoff documentation have not been well studied to date. We propose the use of a system to automatically populate data in handoff (or sign-out) documents. The benefits will be (1) standardization of this information, and (2) reduction of discrepancies between the handoff document and the electronic health record. Errors in handoff documents have the potential to impact patient safety, as clinical decisions are often made on the basis of the medications or laboratory values in these documents. This approach will need to be studied to assess its effectiveness in decreasing patient risk associated with handoffs in teaching settings, and in other clinical situations.
机译:2011年7月1日,研究生医学教育认证委员会对居民工作时间限制实施了新的限制,以解决对患者安全的担忧。大量的科学数据表明,疲劳的人的表现下降,连续12到16个小时以上的轮班被认为是不安全的。1在对第一年居民实行连续值班新限制之后,人们对他们对患者安全和居民满意度的影响很大程度上未知, 2 Ahmed等[3]对135篇文章进行了系统评价,评估了工作时间限制对患者死亡率的影响,结果表明患者预后没有整体改善。该评价中包括的一些研究表明,高敏患者的并发症发生率增加。除了安全性方面的可疑改进外,研究还发现认证考试成绩不佳。3第一年居民连续执勤的限制导致了更多的医疗过渡,4通常称为交接。在此过渡过程中可能会丢失重要信息,从而对患者的护理产生负面影响。有效交接的重要因素包括面对面的交流,提问的机会,私人交接地点,随附的书面文件,无干扰的环境以及尽量减少干扰。5准确,简明的文件中应包含患者的提要以及相关内容结果,任务和有条件的行动说明,是提高这些护理过渡有效性的重要工具。创建此类文档需要每天进行更新和修订,鉴于时间限制,这可能是一个挑战。据我们所知,与交接文件有关的电子病历数据中的错误和差异迄今尚未得到很好的研究。我们建议使用一种系统来自动填充交接(或注销)文档中的数据。好处将是(1)此信息的标准化,以及(2)减少移交文件和电子健康记录之间的差异。交接文件中的错误有可能影响患者的安全,因为临床决策通常是基于这些文件中的药物或实验室值来做出的。需要研究这种方法,以评估其在降低教学环境中以及其他临床情况下与交接相关的患者风险方面的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号