首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology >The Effect Of Early Parenteral Administration Of Corticosteroids In Severe Asthma: A Study Not Employing Concomitant Ipratropium Treatment
【24h】

The Effect Of Early Parenteral Administration Of Corticosteroids In Severe Asthma: A Study Not Employing Concomitant Ipratropium Treatment

机译:早期胃肠外给药皮质类固醇对严重哮喘的影响:一项不采用异丙托铵治疗的研究

获取原文
       

摘要

There is studies in the medical literature that supports the use of parenteral corticosteroid and aerosolized anticholinergic treatments in acute asthma. Since study treatments often involve giving both agents, it is not known whether the beneficial effects of corticosteroids are similar in patient given beta adrenergic treatments alone compare to patients given both beta adrenergic and anticholinergic treatments. In this study, the effects of corticosteroid administration was studied in the absence of ipratropium treatment, in a protocol similar to that previously used by the investigators in a prior study that involved both albuterol and ipratropium treatments. Thirty seven adult patients with acute asthma were randomized to either 125 mg of intravenous methylprednisolone(n=19) or to saline(n=18) treatments in a double blinded study. As entry criteria, all patients were required to have significant peak flow reductions despite initial albuterol treatment. Identical regimens of repeated albuterol nebulization were administered to the patients, and peak flow measurements were made serially over 3 hours. Peak flow measurements showed no differences between the 2 groups in terms of change with time. There was also no significant difference in the proportion of patients who were admitted to the hospital for the two groups(steroid n=3, placebo n=2). In conclusion, our study did not show a benefit for parenteral corticosteroid administration in adults treated for acute severe asthma with only beta agonists. Background This study examined the effect of early corticosteroid administration on airway obstruction in emergency room adults asthmatics. In a prior study by us(1), the benefits of parenteral corticosteroids were observed in the presence of concomitant beta agonist and anticholinergic nebulizer treatment. Thus it could not be ascertained if corticosteroids effects required bronchodilator effects of one or both of these nebulized therapies. More specifically, it was not known if patients who received beta agonists therapy in the absence of ipratropium would also benefit from corticosteroid parenteral therapy. The goal of this study was thus to test the hypothesis that early corticosteroid therapy in severe acute asthma is beneficial in the absence of ipratropium treatment. Methods Asthmatic patients were considered for recruitment from the Emergency Department if they had a PEFR which was less than 50% predicted or an absolute PEFR value of less than 200 L/min, after having received an initial 2.5 mg albuterol nebulizer treatment twenty minutes previously. Exclusion criteria included 1) age less than 18 years old, 2) inability to perform peak expiratory flow(PEFR) measurements after the initial pre-study albuterol treatment, 3) smoking history of 10 or more pack years of cigarettes, and 4) pregnancy. Asthma was defined as 1) having a history of asthma diagnosed by a physician, 2) having had a bronchodilator prescribed by a physician, and 3) having had episodes of wheezing that improved with beta agonist inhalers.Patients in the study had all measurements of PEFR performed in the sitting position without nose clips. These were administered by the study physicians using a Wright peak flow meter(model N183JD, Ferraris Medical Ltd, London).. Percent predicted peak flow rates were calculated using the Quanjer prediction equations(2) for smokerson-smokers/ex-smokers which are based solely on age(years), sex, and height(meters). For males the equation for predicted peak flow(L/sec) was 5.48 x height(meters) - .041 x age(years) + 1.58. For females predicted peak flow was 3.72 x height(meters) - .03 x age(years) + 2.24. The recruited patients were randomized to treatment with either methyprednisolone or normal saline administration. Each treatment designation was placed in sealed, opaque envelopes stored in a locked cabinet. A staff member uninvolved with the patient's care then drew into a syringe either 125 mg of freshly dissolved m
机译:医学文献中的研究支持在急性哮喘中使用肠胃外激素和雾化抗胆碱能药物治疗。由于研究治疗通常涉及同时给予两种药物,因此尚不知道单独使用β-肾上腺素能治疗的患者与使用β-肾上腺素能和抗胆碱能治疗的患者相比,皮质类固醇的益处是否相似。在这项研究中,在没有异丙托铵治疗的情况下对皮质类固醇给药的效果进行了研究,其方案类似于先前研究者在涉及沙丁胺醇和异丙托铵治疗的研究中所使用的方案。在双盲研究中,将37例成年急性哮喘患者随机分为125 mg静脉注射甲基强的松龙(n = 19)或盐水(n = 18)治疗。作为入院标准,尽管最初进行了沙丁胺醇治疗,但所有患者均必须具有明显的峰值血流减少。对患者进行重复沙丁胺醇雾化的相同治疗方案,并在3小时内连续进行峰值流量测量。峰值流量测量显示两组之间随时间的变化没有差异。两组入院患者的比例也没有显着差异(类固醇n = 3,安慰剂n = 2)。总而言之,我们的研究并未显示仅使用β受体激动剂治疗急性严重哮喘的成年人对肠胃外皮质类固醇激素的使用没有益处。背景本研究检查了早期皮质类固醇激素对急诊室成年哮喘患者气道阻塞的影响。在我们先前的研究中(1),在同时存在β激动剂和抗胆碱能雾化剂治疗的情况下,观察到肠胃外皮质类固醇的益处。因此,不能确定皮质类固醇的作用是否需要这些雾化疗法中的一种或两种的支气管扩张药作用。更具体地说,尚不清楚在缺乏异丙托铵的情况下接受β激动剂治疗的患者是否也会从糖皮质激素胃肠外治疗中受益。因此,本研究的目的是检验以下假设:在缺乏异丙托铵治疗的情况下,早期糖皮质激素治疗对严重急性哮喘有益。方法在二十分钟前接受2.5 mg沙丁胺醇雾化剂治疗后,如果PEFR低于预测值的50%或绝对PEFR值低于200 L / min,则考虑从急诊科招募哮喘患者。排除标准包括1)小于18岁的年龄,2)最初的沙丁胺醇治疗后无法进行峰值呼气流量(PEFR)测量,3)吸烟10包或更多年的吸烟史以及4)怀孕。哮喘的定义是:1)有医生确诊的哮喘病史; 2)有医生处方的支气管扩张剂; 3)有β受体激动剂吸入剂改善的喘息发作。 PEFR在坐姿下进行,没有鼻夹。这些由研究医师使用Wright峰值流量计(伦敦Ferraris Medical Ltd,型号N183JD)进行管理。对于吸烟者/非吸烟者/前吸烟者,使用Quanjer预测方程式(2)计算了预测峰值流速的百分比。仅基于年龄(岁),性别和身高(米)。对于男性,预测峰值流量(L / sec)的方程为5.48 x身高(米)-.041 x年龄(年)+ 1.58。对于雌性,预测的峰值流量为3.72 x身高(米)-.03 x年龄(年)+ 2.24。招募的患者被随机分配接受甲泼尼龙或生理盐水治疗。每个处理名称都放置在密封,不透明的信封中,该信封存储在上锁的橱柜中。然后,一名与患者护理无关的工作人员将125 mg新鲜溶解的m放入注射器中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号