首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics >Impact Of Physicians Decision Making On Cesarean Section In Nulliparous Women In Spontaneous Labor
【24h】

Impact Of Physicians Decision Making On Cesarean Section In Nulliparous Women In Spontaneous Labor

机译:医师决策对自然分娩中产妇的剖宫产的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The current study tries to explain a wide variation in the Cesarean Section rate of an obstetric team attending nulliparous women at term in spontaneous labor.Methods: Physicians were divided in two Groups: Group A formed by doctors in the first quartile of Cesarean section rate and Group B formed by doctors in the fourth quartile. Differences in maternal and fetal factors, clinical practice and perinatal outcomes were studied.Results: No differences were observed in maternal and gestational characteristics. No significant differences were found in length of the first stage of delivery (5,02 hours vs. 5,31 hours; p>0,05) nor in the second stage (1,82 hours vs. 1,99 hours; p>0,05). There were significant differences in obstetric practice: Group A presented a significant lower trend in diagnosis of dystocia (23,26% vs. 46,84%, p<0,05), fetal loss of wellbeing (0,72% vs 9,30%; p<0,05) and use of forceps(11,72% vs 27,14%; p<0,05). No differences were found in use of epidural analgesia (89,86% vs 78,29%, p>0,05) and episiotomy (60,94% vs. 50%; p>0,05). Perinatal outcomes were similar in both Groups.Conclusions: Cesarean section in nulliparous women were significantly influenced by individual physician’s decisions due to possible over diagnosis of dystocia and fetal compromise. These results should inspire specific actions to homogenize results between different professionals. INTRODUCTION Cesarean section rates worldwide have been increasing in the past few years. In Europe it increased by 13,8% in the last 14 years1. Causes of this increase are not simple or easy to understand and vary in function of different factors such as parity, category of pregnancy, and course of pregnancy and delivery. Therefore, it’s necessary to classify different groups of women to understand the causes of cesarean section rates.The Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) is a new approach to classify the obstetric population according to total inclusive and mutually exclusive categories2. This system allows to better understand obstetric events creating solid and robust groups that are comparable between different delivery units.Nulliparous women at term with single gestation and cephalic presentation in spontaneous onset of labor (Group 1 of the TGCS) are often the largerst contributor to overall obstetric population. Therefore, its contribution to the overall cesarean section rate uses to be quite important3.The cesarean section rate shows wide variation among different geographic areas4. Inside an Obstetric unit we can also observe differences between professionals involved in the obstetric process. This variation is usually justified because of some maternal characteristics (age, weight, ethnicity), obstetric pathologies (hypertension, diabetes) or fetal compromise (growth restriction, loss of fetal wellbeing…). In summary, we can categorize the causes of cesarean section rates in two big groups: 1) increasing proportions of patients with conditions necessitating cesarean delivery; or 2) changes in physician practice patterns, leading to cesarean deliveries that would not have been performed previously.The aim of this study is to better understand differences in the cesarean section rate among professionals in our team, taking into account maternal and obstetric factors but also focusing on obstetric practice and perinatal outcomes. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of women belonging to TGCS Group 1 admitted for spontaneous onset labor to our Delivery Unit during 2015. Our institution, the Hospital Universitari General De Catalunya (HUGC), is a tertiary hospital in the region of Barcelona (Spain), serving 2400 deliveries per year. The medical team is formed by local staff and external doctors who attend their own patients.Data were extracted from our local database which contains records of all patients admitted in the labor ward. These records include information about the medical team, characteristics of patients, monitori
机译:背景:本研究试图解释在自然分娩时就诊的产科团队剖腹产率的巨大差异。方法:医师分为两组:由剖腹产第一个四分位数的医生组成的A组率和第四四分位数的医生组成的B组。研究了母婴因素,临床实践和围产期结局的差异。结果:孕产妇和妊娠特征未见差异。在分娩的第一阶段(5.02小时vs.5.31小时; p> 0.05)和第二阶段(1.82小时与1.99小时; p> 0,05)。产科实践存在显着差异:A组诊断难产的趋势明显较低(23.26%vs. 46.84%,p <0.05),胎儿健康损失(0.72%vs 9)。 30%; p <0.05)和使用镊子(11.72%vs 27.14%; p <0.05)。硬膜外镇痛(89.86%vs 78.29%,p> 0.05)和会阴切开术(60.94%vs 50%; p> 0.05)的使用无差异。两组的围产期结局相似。结论:由于可能诊断为难产和胎儿功能受损,因此未产妇剖宫产会受到个别医师决定的影响。这些结果应激发特定的行动,以使不同专业人员之间的结果趋于一致。引言在过去几年中,全球剖宫产率一直在上升。在欧洲,过去14年增长了13,8%1。造成这种增加的原因并不简单或不容易理解,其功能因不同因素而异,例如胎次,怀孕类别以及怀孕和分娩过程。因此,有必要对不同类型的妇女进行分类,以了解剖宫产率的原因。十组分类系统(TGCS)是一种根据总包容性和互斥性类别对产科人群进行分类的新方法。该系统有助于更好地了解产科事件,从而建立坚实而强大的群体,在不同的分娩单位之间具有可比性。单胎妊娠和头位出现的足月自然分娩的无脂肪妇女(TGCS的第1组)通常是总体上最大的贡献者产科人口。因此,它对剖宫产率的贡献非常重要3。剖宫产率在不同地理区域之间表现出很大的差异4。在产科内,我们还可以观察参与产科过程的专业人员之间的差异。通常由于某些孕产妇特征(年龄,体重,种族),产科病理(高血压,糖尿病)或胎儿妥协(生长受限,胎儿健康丧失……)而证明这种差异是合理的。总而言之,我们可以将剖宫产率的原因分为两大类:1)增加了必须剖宫产的病患比例。或2)改变医生的实践方式,导致以前无法进行剖宫产。本研究的目的是更好地了解我们团队中专业人员的剖宫产率差异,同时考虑到产妇和产科因素,但还侧重于产科实践和围产期结局。方法我们对2015年接受自发性分娩的TGCS组1的妇女进行了回顾性分析。我们的机构,加泰罗尼亚大学综合医院(HUGC),是巴塞罗那(西班牙)地区的三级医院,每年交付2400架。该医疗团队由当地工作人员和外部医生组成,他们亲自照顾病人,数据从我们当地的数据库中提取,该数据库包含所有在劳动病房住院的患者的记录。这些记录包括有关医疗团队,患者特征,监护人的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号