...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >Unusual Placement Of A Central Venous Catheter
【24h】

Unusual Placement Of A Central Venous Catheter

机译:中央静脉导管异常放置

获取原文
           

摘要

Financial Support- Subharti Medical College, Meerut, U.P., INDIA.;Introduction Placement of central venous catheters, although often considered to be a relatively safe and “junior” level procedure, may be associated with life-threatening complications. Complications 1,2,3,4 can be of an acute nature, which fell into the categories of pneumothorax, hydrothorax, cardiac tamponade, and hemothorax or manifesting later viz shearing or migration of catheter, infection at the catheter site, embolism etc. We present here a case of an eighteen year old male patient who had a central venous catheter (CVC) inserted in the right internal jugular vein during thoracotomy for hemothorax. Although the conventional techniques for checking catheter position were consistent with correct placement, the catheter was found to traverse the pleural cavity during thoracotomy.Case reportAn eighteen year old male patient presented with penetrating injury of the right side of chest following a road traffic accident and was bought to emergency room within thirty minutes of injury. Immediate chest tube insertion (Fr size 32) was performed on the right side in the emergency room by the attending surgeon. Two intravenous (i.v.) access secured (16 G), fluids and colloids started. Request for arrangement of blood was made. The patient bled almost two liters within 15 minutes and his condition started deteriorating. His vitals were pulse 144/min, blood pressure 84/53 mm Hg, respiratory rate 28/min. Blood and inotopic support (nor adrenaline) was started and the decision to perform an emergency thoracotomy for control of bleeding was taken. Blood were arranged and patient was shifted to operation theatre (OT) after obtaining informed and written high risk consent (ASA Grade IV E). In the OT, Monitors (ECG, NIBP, SPO2, EtCO2, and Temperature) were attached and CVC insertion planned through right internal jugular vein route before induction. Under all aseptic precautions, CVC (Certofix Duo V720 B Braun) was inserted using catheter over guide wire (Seldinger's) technique and position confirmed by aspirating blood freely from both lumens. I.V. fluids (Ringer's lactate) started from the distal lumen and colloids (hydroxy ethyl starch) through proximal one. The patient was premedicated with inj. Midazolam 1 mg, inj. Fentanyl 1mcg/kg, and inj. Glycopyrollate 0.2mg. Induction was done using inj. Ketamine 1.5mg/kg and inj. Succinylcholine 2 mg/kg. All the drugs were given through peripheral route. The patient was then intubated using left sided double lumen tube (DLT) [Bronchocath ?, Mallinckrodt ? fr 37]and after confirmation of correct placement of DLT, patient was positioned in left lateral position and surgery started. Inj. Vecuronium Bromide (0.08 mg/kg) was given through CVC. However, the effect of Vecuronium did not come as expected and it was hence repeated through peripheral line and desired effect obtained. This raised the suspicion for misplacement of CVC. As soon as surgeon opened the pleural cavity, around one liter of fluid mixed with blood was suctioned; bleeding vessels were identified and ligated. It was then that the surgeon noticed the CVC lying freely in pleural cavity. Intravenous fluids were immediately stopped and started through peripheral lines and CVC was removed. Surgery continued and rest of the procedure was completed uneventfully. The patient was shifted to SICU for post operative ventilatory support after changing over from DLT to size 8.5 portex endotracheal tube. The post operative period went uneventfully; patient was extubated on second post operative day and discharged from the hospital on seventh post operative day.;Discussion Central venous catheters are essential components of modern critical care. They allow delivery of medications, i.v. fluids, parenteral nutrition, hemodialysis and monitoring of haemodynamic variables. Unfortunately, the use of central venous catheters is associated with adverse events that are both hazardous to
机译:财务支持-印度美特鲁市Subharti医学院;引言放置中央静脉导管虽然通常被认为是相对安全和“初级”水平的手术,但可能会危及生命。并发症1,2,3,4具有急性性质,可分为气胸,胸膜积水,心脏压塞和血胸,或后来出现导管剪切或迁移,导管部位感染,栓塞等。本例为一名18岁男性患者的案例,该患者在开胸进行胸腔积血时在右颈内静脉中插入了中央静脉导管(CVC)。尽管传统的检查导管位置的技术与正确的放置方法相一致,但发现在开胸手术中导管横穿了胸膜腔。病例报告一名18岁的男性患者在道路交通事故后出现胸部右侧穿透性损伤,在受伤三十分钟内买到急诊室。主治医生在急诊室的右侧立即进行了胸管插入(Fr规格32)。保证了两个静脉(i.v.)通路(16 G),液体和胶体的流动。提出了安排血液的要求。病人在15分钟内流血了近两升,病情开始恶化。他的生命力是脉搏144 / min,血压84/53 mm Hg,呼吸频率28 / min。开始提供血液和异位支持物(去甲肾上腺素),并决定进行紧急开胸手术以控制出血。在获得知情且书面的高风险同意书(ASA IV E级)后,安排了血液并将患者转移到手术室(OT)。在OT中,连接了监护仪(ECG,NIBP,SPO2,EtCO2和温度),并计划在诱导前通过右颈内静脉途径进行CVC插入。在所有无菌预防措施下,使用导管通过导丝(Seldinger's)技术插入CVC(Certofix Duo V720 B Braun),并通过从两个内腔自由抽吸血液来确认位置。 I.V.液体(林格氏乳酸盐)从远端管腔和胶体(羟乙基淀粉)开始流向近端。该患者已预先注射过药。咪达唑仑1毫克,注射芬太尼1mcg / kg和注射剂。甘草酸0.2mg。诱导使用注射进行。氯胺酮1.5mg / kg和注射剂。琥珀酰胆碱2 mg / kg。所有药物均通过外围途径给药。然后使用左侧双腔管(DLT)[Bronchocath ?, Mallinckrodt? fr 37],在确认正确放置DLT后,将患者置于左侧位置并开始手术。 j通过CVC给予溴化维库溴铵(0.08 mg / kg)。但是,维库溴铵的效果达不到预期的效果,因此通过外围线重复进行,获得了所需的效果。这引起了对CVC放错位置的怀疑。外科医生打开胸膜腔后,立即抽吸了大约一升混有血液的液体。确定并结扎出血血管。那时,外科医生注意到CVC自由地躺在胸膜腔中。立即停止静脉输液,并通过外围管线开始输注CVC。手术继续进行,其余过程顺利完成。从DLT换成8.5号portex气管导管后,患者被转移到SICU进行术后呼吸支持。术后时间平稳。患者在术后第二天拔管,并在术后第七天出院。;讨论中央静脉导管是现代重症监护的重要组成部分。他们允许药物的递送液体,肠胃外营养,血液透析和血液动力学变量监测。不幸的是,使用中心静脉导管会带来不利于健康的不良事件

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号