...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >The Cost of Altruism: Patient Charges for Organ Donation After Traumatic Injury
【24h】

The Cost of Altruism: Patient Charges for Organ Donation After Traumatic Injury

机译:利他主义的代价:创伤后器官捐赠的病人收费

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the origin and extent of institutional charges incurred by lethally-injured patients while awaiting the diagnosis of brain death and organ procurement.DESIGN: Retrospective review.SETTING: Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Urban Tertiary Care Trauma Center.PATIENTS: 31 lethally-injured patients awaiting the diagnosis of brain death and subsequent organ procurement.INTERVENTIONS: None.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Itemized hospital financial and medical records were reviewed. Length of stay and major medical complications were abstracted and charges calculated for three overlapping time periods : total hospital stay, lethal injury stay (period following documentation of a "lethal injury" until a second brain death exam was performed), and brain death stay (period between the first and second brain death exams).RESULTS: Multiple medical complications (3.2 +/- 0.2) and interventions occurred in all patients awaiting the diagnosis of brain death. The mean length of lethal injury stay was 19 +/- 2 hours; the mean length of brain death stay was 12 +/- 1 hours. As a result, significant (lethal injury stay - $20,902 +/- 1409 and brain death stay - $16,645 +/- 1223) hospital charges were accrued. Even though a "lethal injury" had been documented, and care was targeted solely at maintaining organ function, these charges were not subsidized by the local organ procurement organization (OPO).CONCLUSIONS: 1. Numerous medical complications are common in the traumatized patient awaiting the declaration of brain death. These require aggressive critical care interventions and management. 2. Significant hospital charges are accrued by patients for the care necessary prior to organ procurement. 3. OPOs must consider and enact reimbursement policy change to cover the cost of care before brain death is declared in all organ donors. INTRODUCTION More than 38,000 patients are currently awaiting organ transplantation.1 Nearly 2000 additional patients die each year while on organ transplantation waiting lists.2 A shortage of donor organs is primarily responsible for these staggering numbers. The altruistic spirit of donors and their families is cited as the major impetus for organ donation. In this regard, altruism is thought to bear little or no expense, and it is generally agreed that organ donation should add no financial burden to the family of an organ donor.3Attempts to increase referrals to organ procurement organizations (OPOs) by enacting required request laws have been undertaken, but have largely had little impact on organ donation rates.4 Once a potential organ donor is identified and referred to an OPO, actual organ procurement rates continue to be suboptimal.5,6 Failure to obtain consent from the next of kin remains the single largest cause of eligible organ procurement failure, with more than 40% of families refusing donation.5-7Once the family has consented, the multiple physiologic derangements which the potential organ donor manifests require aggressive, labor intensive management in order to maintain organ function until legal brain death is declared and procurement can be undertaken. One recent review suggests that the medical failures to organ procurement may be largely preventable with invasive hemodynamic monitoring, aggressive rewarming, and liberal transfusion therapy.7 This high level of care necessary to sustain potential organ donors until legal brain death is declared (and the OPO assumes financial responsibility for care) is expensive, and to date has not been itemized and reported as a part of the cost of the organ procurement process. We investigated the origin and extent of institutional charges incurred by lethally-injured patients while awaiting the medical and legal determination of brain death. MATERIALS AND METHODS With cooperation from the Delaware Valley Transplant Program (local OPO), traumatically injured organ and tissue donors cared for between 1991 and June 1995 at the University of Pennsylvania
机译:目的:确定在等待诊断为脑死亡和器官采购的过程中致命伤患者所收取的机构费用的来源和范围设计:回顾性回顾背景:城市重症监护创伤中心外科重症监护室患者:致命31受伤的患者正在等待诊断为脑死亡并随后进行器官采购。干预措施:无。主要观察指标:检查详细的医院财务和医疗记录。提取住院时间和主要医疗并发症,并计算三个重叠时间段的费用:总住院时间,致命伤住院时间(记录为“致命伤病”的期间,直到进行第​​二次脑死亡检查为止)和脑死亡住院时间(结果:在所有等待诊断为脑死亡的患者中发生了多种医疗并发症(3.2 +/- 0.2),并进行了干预。致命伤的平均停留时间为19 +/- 2小时;脑死亡的平均停留时间为12 +/- 1小时。结果,产生了重大住院费用(致命伤住院-$ 20,902 +/- 1409和脑死亡住院时间-$ 16,645 +/- 1223)。即使已经记录了“致命伤害”,并且仅针对维持器官功能进行了护理,但这些费用并没有得到当地器官采购组织(OPO)的补贴。结论:1.等待受伤的患者中经常发生许多医疗并发症。脑死亡的宣告。这些需要积极的重症监护干预和管理。 2.在器官采购之前,患者需要支付大量的医院必需护理费用。 3.在所有器官捐献者宣布脑死亡之前,OPO必须考虑并制定报销政策变更以支付护理费用。引言目前有38,000多名患者在等待器官移植。1每年有近2000名患者在器官移植等待名单上死亡。2供体器官短缺是造成这些惊人数字的主要原因。捐赠者及其家人的无私奉献精神被认为是器官捐赠的主要动力。在这方面,利他主义被认为几乎不花钱,甚至没有花任何钱,并且普遍同意器官捐献不应该给器官捐献者的家庭增加经济负担。3尝试通过提出要求的请求来增加对器官采购组织(OPO)的推荐已实施法律,但对器官捐献率影响不大。4一旦确定了潜在的器官捐献者并将其转介给OPO,实际器官采购率将继续不理想。5,6未能获得下一个器官捐献者的同意。亲属仍然是合格器官采购失败的唯一最大原因,超过40%的家庭拒绝捐赠。5-7一旦家庭同意,潜在器官捐赠者表现出的多种生理紊乱需要积极,劳动密集的管理才能维持器官功能直至宣布合法的脑死亡并可以进行采购。最近的一项评论表明,通过侵入性血流动力学监测,积极的变温和自由输血治疗,可以很大程度上预防器官采购的医疗失败。7这种高水平的护理对于维持潜在的器官捐献者直至宣布合法的脑死亡是必需的(和OPO假设您对护理承担财务责任)是昂贵的,并且迄今为止尚未进行详细列出和报告,这是器官采购过程成本的一部分。我们调查了致命伤患者在等待医学和法律确定的脑死亡时所产生的机构费用的来源和程度。材料与方法在特拉华河谷移植计划(Local OPO)的合作下,受创伤的器官和组织供体在1991年至1995年6月间在宾夕法尼亚大学接受了护理

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号