...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >Intrathecal Bupivacaine Vs. Bupivacaine And Clonidine In Paediatrics Age Group: A Comparative Evaluation.
【24h】

Intrathecal Bupivacaine Vs. Bupivacaine And Clonidine In Paediatrics Age Group: A Comparative Evaluation.

机译:鞘内注射布比卡因布比卡因和可乐定在儿科年龄组中的比较评价。

获取原文
           

摘要

The study was done to compare the efficacy, duration, quality and side effects of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine plus clonidine. A prospective randomised double blind study was carried out in 60 ASA-1 paediatrics patients undergoing surgeries below T8 dermatome up to 2 hrs duration. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups. Group-A received bupivacaine .5% heavy (0.4mg/kg for 5-15kg or 0.3mg/kg for >15 kg) and Group-B received bupivacaine 0.5%heavy (0.4mg/kg for 5-15kg or 0.3mg/kg for >15kg) and preservative free clonidine (1 mcg/kg), comprising 30 patients each. Time of onset of sensory block, maximum level of sensory block, duration of sensory block, duration of post-op analgesia and side effects were observed. Data obtained was subjected to statistical computation and analysed using computer programme statistical package for social science (SPSS)ver-16.0 and tests performed were unpaired student-t test, nonparametric mann-whitney two samples test and Chi square test. Value of p<0.05 was considered significant and p<0.0000001 highly significant. Awake sedation score with clonidine was better than bupivacaine alone. The side effect profile: only one patient of Group-A had bradycardia and in Group-B two patients had bradycardia and two patients had hypotension. No patients in any group had nausea vomitting, post dural puncture headache, urinary retention or high spinal. Adding clonidine is providing early onset of sensory block, adequate sedation and prolonged postoperative analgesia. Introduction Pain is a major concern of human kind since our beginning and object of ubiquitous efforts to understand and to control it. Pediatric pain management is challenging and one of the frontiers of modern anesthesia. The first report on paediatric spinal anesthesia was published by AUGUST BIER in 1899, when the technique was performed with cocaine in an 11 year old boy for ischium abscess drainage.Spinal anaesthesia is advantageous in that it uses small dose of anesthetic, is easy to perform and offers a rapid onset, reliable surgical analgesia and good muscle relaxation. Advantages sometime offset by relatively short duration of action and complaints of post operative pain when it wears off. Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine hydrochloride is popular for longer procedure due to its prolonged duration but there is need to intensify and increased duration of sensory blocked without increasing the intensity and duration of motor blocked and thus prolong the duration of post operative analgesia.Various studies have shown that 1mcg/kg clonidine provides a significant improvement in spinal anaesthesia quality, duration and reduces the need of post-operative analgesic requirement without a significant side effects[1,2,3,4,5,10,11]. There is adequate evidence that α-2 adrenergic agonist clonidine given intrathecally produces anti nociceptive effects without any neurotoxicity and useful in the treatment of somatic pain[1,2,3,4]. However, unlike spinal opioides clonidine does not produce pruritis and respiratory depression. The rationale behind intrathecal administration of clonidine is to achieve a high drug concentration in the vicinity of α-2 adrenoreceptors in spinal cord by blocking pain conduction of C and A-delta fibres. It increases potassium conductance in isolated neurons in vitro and intensifies conduction block of local anaesthetic[7] . Aδ fibres are myelinated afferent sensory nerve fibres which conduct pain, cold temperature and touch sensation, and C fibres are nonmyelinated postganglionic sympathetic fibres which conduct pain, warm temperature and touch sensation.[8] Clonidine is now an acceptable adjuvant to local anaesthetic for epidural route nevertheless clinical trial provide evidence that less clonidine is needed intrathecaly than epidural to produce same analgesic effect with fewer side effects.In the present study we tried to find out effectiveness of 1mcg/kg intrathecal clonidine added to h
机译:该研究是为了比较鞘内注射布比卡因和布比卡因加可乐定的疗效,持续时间,质量和副作用。在60名ASA-1儿科患者中进行了一项前瞻性随机双盲研究,这些患者正在接受T8皮刀以下手术,持续2小时。将患者随机分为两组。 A组接受了0.5%的布比卡因重(5-15kg为0.4mg / kg或> 15 kg的为0.3mg / kg),B组接受0.5%重的布比卡因(5-15kg或0.3mg / kg为0.4mg / kg体重> 15kg时,每公斤体重)和防腐剂游离可乐定(1 mcg / kg),每人包括30名患者。观察感觉障碍的发作时间,感觉障碍的最高水平,感觉障碍的持续时间,术后镇痛的持续时间和副作用。对获得的数据进行统计计算,并使用社会科学计算机程序统计软件包(SPSS)ver-16.0进行分析,所进行的测试为不配对的学生t检验,非参数曼惠特尼两个样本检验和卡方检验。 p <0.05的值被认为是显着的,而p <0.0000001是高度显着的。可乐定清醒镇静评分优于单用布比卡因。副作用:A组仅1例有心动过缓,B组2例有心动过缓,2例有低血压。在任何组中,没有患者出现恶心呕吐,硬膜穿刺后头痛,尿retention留或高脊髓。添加可乐定可提供较早的感觉阻滞,足够的镇静作用和延长的术后镇痛作用。简介自从我们开始理解疼痛并控制疼痛以来,疼痛一直是人类最关心的问题。小儿疼痛处理是具有挑战性的,并且是现代麻醉的前沿领域之一。 1899年AUGUST BIER发表了第一篇有关小儿脊柱麻醉的报告,当时该技术是在一个11岁男孩进行可卡因脓肿引流术中使用可卡因进行的。并提供快速起效,可靠的手术镇痛和良好的肌肉松弛。优势有时会被相对较短的持续时间所抵消,并且抱怨手术后疼痛消失。高压布比卡因高压麻醉下的脊髓麻醉因其持续时间长而被推荐用于更长的手术过程,但需要在不增加运动阻滞的强度和持续时间的情况下加强和增加感觉阻滞的持续时间,从而延长术后镇痛的持续时间。结果表明,1mcg / kg可乐定可显着改善脊髓麻醉的质量,持续时间,并减少术后镇痛的需要,而无明显副作用[1,2,3,4,5,10,11]。有足够的证据表明鞘内注射α-2肾上腺素能激动剂可乐定可产生抗伤害作用,而没有任何神经毒性,可用于治疗躯体疼痛[1,2,3,4]。但是,与脊柱阿片类药物不同,可乐定不会产生瘙痒和呼吸抑制。鞘内注射可乐定的基本原理是通过阻止C和A三角洲纤维的疼痛传导,在脊髓中的α-2肾上腺素受体附近达到高药物浓度。它可以增加离体神经元的钾电导率,并增强局部麻醉药的传导阻滞[7]。 Aδ纤维是传导疼痛,低温和触觉的有髓神经传入感觉神经纤维,C纤维是传导疼痛,温暖的温度和触觉的无髓鞘神经节后交感神经纤维。[8]可乐定现在是硬膜外途径局部麻醉的可接受佐剂,但是临床试验提供的证据表明,鞘内注射可乐定比硬膜外需要更少的可乐定,以产生相同的镇痛效果且副作用更少。可乐定加入了h

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号