...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >Loss Of Fresh Gas Flow Due To Malposition Of Vaporizer: An Oft Repeated Anaesthetic Misadventure
【24h】

Loss Of Fresh Gas Flow Due To Malposition Of Vaporizer: An Oft Repeated Anaesthetic Misadventure

机译:蒸发器放置不当导致新鲜气体流量损失:反复多次麻醉不当

获取原文
           

摘要

We report a case of complete loss of fresh gas supply at anesthesia machine outlet due to malposition of vaporizer on to the manifold where it was lifted off and tilted up on one side. We also re-emphasize on the importance of strictly adhering to the recommendations for pre-use checks in the Anesthesia machine checklist, and by the manufacturers; and also for an effective collaboration amongst the operating room personnel. INTRODUCTION Equipment malfunction contributes to morbidity and mortality in anaesthesia. About one fourth of equipment problems are related to human error.1,2 An integral component of anesthesia machine is vaporizer, which if not used as per specifications leads to a variety of anesthetic complications. We highlight a case where improper use of the vaporizer led to failure to ventilate intraoperatively. CASE REPORT A 40 year old male patient, ASA Grade I, was posted for acromian decompression. The surgery was planned under general anaesthesia. The Blease Sirius Spacelabs anesthesia workstation (Blease Medical Equipment Limited, Washington, USA) passed the daily electronic system check and the circle breathing circuit was also manually checked using thumb occlusion test before the case. The BleaseDatum L Series halothane and sevoflurane vaporizers already mounted on the machine were each checked by performing leak pressure test .Standard monitors were attached and baseline parameters recorded. After premedication and preoxygenation, the patient was induced with 5mg/kg of thiopentone and 0.1mg/kg vecuronium; mask ventilation with 2.0% sevoflurane and N2O and O2 was performed. The patient was intubated, bilateral air entry checked; and switched over to volume controlled ventilation. The vital parameters remained stable. After intubation, it was decided to shift the patient on isoflurane. The technician replaced the already mounted upstream halothane vaporizer with the isoflurane vaporizer. The dial concentration was set at 2.0% aiming to maintain MAC 1.0. Soon after, there was a low minute volume alarm and the bellows were collapsing. Immediately cuff leak, disconnections, loosening of CO2 canister, and sticking of unidirectional valves were checked. But there was none. The patient was taken on bag and the flows increased but the patient could not be ventilated even with the adjustable pressure limiting valve fully closed; which was free of obstruction. The patient could only be ventilated by activating the oxygen flush; even this was shortlived as enough pressure could not be generated and the bag quickly emptied once the O2 flush was released. So the patient was taken on auxiliary common gas outlet but of no avail; the bag remained empty and could be filled only with the oxygen flush. There was no gas flow at the outlet despite the bobbins floating in the flowmeter.Meanwhile a good check was kept on the patient's vital parameters that remained stable, probably because of those desperate intermittent oxygen flushes and was taken on manual resuscitator. As the cause of failure to ventilate could not be located, the remaining case was conducted on a changed anesthesia machine maintaining anesthesia with isoflurane, intermittent intravenous boluses of fentanyl and vecuronium. The patient was successfully reversed; conscious and oriented. The previous anesthesia machine was inspected and nothing was found functionally wrong except that the isoflurane vaporizer was slightly (<10degree) tilted to one side, lifted up on the right and the locking lever was not in place, the concentration control dial could be turned on clockwise and when the test lung was attached, it barely inflated.
机译:我们报告了由于蒸发器在歧管上位置不当而引起的麻醉器出口完全失去新鲜气体的情况,歧管在该歧管上被举起并向一侧倾斜。我们还强调了严格遵守麻醉机检查表和制造商的使用前检查建议的重要性;以及在手术室人员之间进行有效的协作。简介设备故障会导致麻醉中的发病率和死亡率增加。大约四分之一的设备问题与人为失误有关。1,2麻醉机不可或缺的组成部分是蒸发器,如果​​不按规格使用,则会导致各种麻醉并发症。我们重点介绍了一种不当使用蒸发器导致术中通气失败的情况。病例报告一名40岁的ASA I级男性患者因肩峰减压而死亡。该手术计划在全身麻醉下进行。 Blease Sirius Spacelabs麻醉工作站(美国华盛顿州,Blease医疗设备有限公司)通过了每日电子系统检查,并且在病例发生之前,还使用拇指咬合测试对了循环呼吸回路进行了手动检查。机器上已安装的BleaseDatum L系列氟烷和七氟醚气化器均通过泄漏压力测试进行了检查,并附有标准监测仪并记录了基线参数。在用药前和预加氧后,用5mg / kg的硫代戊酮和0.1mg / kg的维库溴铵诱导患者。使用2.0%七氟醚和N2O和O2进行面罩通气。对患者进行了插管,检查了双侧空气进入情况;并切换到音量控制的通风系统。生命参数保持稳定。插管后,决定让患者换用异氟醚。技术人员将已安装的上游氟烷蒸发器替换为异氟烷蒸发器。表盘浓度设置为2.0%,旨在维持MAC 1.0。不久之后,有一个低分钟音量警报,并且波纹管崩溃了。立即检查袖带泄漏,断开连接,CO2罐松动以及单向阀是否粘附。但是没有。将病人放在袋子上,流量增加,但即使完全关闭可调限压阀,也无法为病人通风。没有障碍物。只能通过激活氧气冲洗为患者通气。即使这样也很短,因为无法产生足够的压力,并且一旦释放氧气冲洗袋便很快排空。因此,该患者被带到辅助的普通气体出口,但无济于事。袋子仍然是空的,只能用氧气冲洗。尽管有线轴漂浮在流量计上,但出口处没有气流。同时对患者的生命参数进行了很好的检查,这些生命参数保持稳定,这可能是由于那些拼命的间歇性氧气冲洗并由人工复苏器进行了检查。由于无法确定通气失败的原因,其余病例在更换的麻醉机上进行,麻醉机使用异氟烷,芬太尼和维库溴铵间歇静脉推注维持麻醉。病人成功逆转;有意识和有针对性的。检查了之前使用的麻醉机,没有发现任何功能上的错误,只是将异氟烷气化器稍微向一侧倾斜(<10度),向右提起,并且锁定杆不在位,可以打开浓度控制拨盘顺时针旋转并连接测试肺后,它几乎没有膨胀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号