首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics >A Monoclonal Antibody Quantitative Measurement And Immunohistochemical Localisation Of Carcinoembryonic Antigen In Ovarian Neoplasia
【24h】

A Monoclonal Antibody Quantitative Measurement And Immunohistochemical Localisation Of Carcinoembryonic Antigen In Ovarian Neoplasia

机译:卵巢肿瘤中癌胚抗原的单克隆抗体定量测定及免疫组化定位

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the significance of including CEA in serum and tissues in the management protocol of patients with ovarian malignancies. Patients And Methods: The study included 68 patients which was divided into three groups. Group [A] included 21 patients with malignant ovarian tumors. Group included three patients with boderline ovarian tumors. Group [C] included eight patients with benign ovarian tumors, Group [D] included 36 women without any apparent gynaecologic disorder ( control group). Serum level of CEA was measured in all patients in group A, B and C prior to treatment and at least 12 weeks following therapy. Formalin - fixed and paraffin - embedded tissue blocks taken from 2 different sites of the studied lesions were prepared. Immunohistochemical staining for CEA was performed for the studied tissues. Results: All the ovarian tumors investigated in this work were of epithelial origin. All benign and borderline ovarian tumors had negative pre- and post-treatment serum CEA levels (< 5ng/ml) and were negative for CEA tissue stain.85.71% of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinomas had negative pre-treatment serum levels . All the squamous cell carcinomas and 66.67% of each of mucinous cystadenocarcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas had positive (>=5ng/ml) pre-treatment serum levels. After treatment the different histological types of ovarian carcinimas were seronegative for CEA.The highest percentage of positive staining (100%) was found in squamous cell carcinomas [50% (+1) and 50% (+3)], followed by 66.67% of mucinous cystadenocarcinomasThe mean difference between pre-and post-treatment serum CEA was significant in mucinous cystadinocarcinoma with negative and positive tissue reaction and in negatively stained serous cystadinomacarcinoma.The percentages of cases of ovarian carcinomas with positive pre-treatment serum CEA increased with the increase of grade of malignancy from 33.33% in G1 to 55.56% in G II and 66.67% in GIII.No definite relation could be detected between the grade of malignancy and the intensity (degree) of reaction of malignant ovarian tumors to CEA immunostaining.The percentage of cases with positive pre-treatment levels of serum CEA increased progressively with the advance in clinical staging. The incidence was 37.5% in stage I, 55.56% in stage II, 66.67% in stage III, and 100% in stage IV. No definite relation could be detected between the clinical stages and the degree of reaction of ovarian carcinomas to CEA tissue stain. Conclusion: This study indicated that immunohistochemical identification of CEA in tumor tissue and of monoclonal antibodies quantitative measurement of CEA in human serum is a useful adjunct in the management protocol of patients with ovarian malignancies. However further studies are required to fully ascertain the usefullness of this technique. Introduction Ovarian cancer is a serious and silent disease and has high rate of mortality among malignant gynecologic tumor. It is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage(1,2,3). Furthermore, even when small ovarian tumors are considered to be resected , there is a recurrence in at least one-third of the patients(2,3,4,5). Unfortunately, despite advances in surgical technique and novel chemotherapeutic agents, survival rates have not improved significantly over past 25 years(2,6).The oncofoetal antigens comprise one particular group of markers produced by human neoplasms, these antigens have been detected in the sera of patients with gynaecological cancer. The practical use of such markers in the diagnosis and follow-up has been limited by the low sensitivity and specificity of their tests (6)..Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the first known tumor markers. Since then, many more have been described, but CEA, determined alone or in combination with others, is still one of the most used. CEA is not organ specific and abnormal values may be found in a wide range of carcinomas (7). Epithelial ovarian cancer is known to pr
机译:目的:评估在血清和组织中加入CEA在卵巢恶性肿瘤患者治疗方案中的意义。患者和方法:该研究包括68位患者,分为三组。 [A组]包括21例卵巢恶性肿瘤患者。该组包括三名患有Boderline卵巢肿瘤的患者。 [C组]包括8例卵巢良性肿瘤患者,[D]组包括36例无明显妇科疾病的妇女(对照组)。在治疗前和治疗后至少12周,对A,B和C组所有患者的血清CEA水平进行了测定。制备了福尔马林固定和石蜡包埋的组织块,该组织块取自研究病变的2个不同部位。对所研究的组织进行CEA的免疫组织化学染色。结果:本研究中所有卵巢肿瘤均起源于上皮。所有良性和交界性卵巢肿瘤治疗前和治疗后血清CEA水平均为阴性(<5ng / ml),且CEA组织染色均为阴性.85.71%的卵巢浆液性囊腺癌治疗前血清均为阴性。所有鳞状细胞癌和每种黏液性囊腺癌和未分化癌中的66.67%的治疗前血清水平均为阳性(> = 5ng / ml)。治疗后不同的卵巢癌组织学类型对CEA呈血清阴性。鳞状细胞癌中阳性染色的百分比最高(100%)[50%(+1)和50%(+3)],其次是66.67%粘液性膀胱腺癌的治疗前后血清CEA的平均差异在组织反应阴性和阳性的粘液性膀胱癌中和浆液性囊性囊腺癌阴性染色中均显着。治疗前血清CEA阳性的卵巢癌病例百分率随增加而增加恶性程度从G1的33.33%降至G II的55.56%和GIII的66.67%。恶性程度与卵巢癌对CEA免疫反应的反应强度(程度)之间没有明确的关系。治疗前血清CEA水平阳性的患者随着临床分期的增加而逐渐增加。发病率在I期为37.5%,II期为55.56%,III期为66.67%,IV期为100%。在临床分期与卵巢癌对CEA组织染色的反应程度之间没有确定的关系。结论:这项研究表明,肿瘤组织中CEA的免疫组织化学鉴定和人血清中CEA的单克隆抗体定量测定是卵巢恶性肿瘤患者治疗方案的有用辅助手段。但是,需要进一步研究来完全确定该技术的有效性。引言卵巢癌是一种严重而无声的疾病,在恶性妇科肿瘤中死亡率很高。它通常被诊断为晚期(1,2,3)。此外,即使考虑切除卵巢小肿瘤,至少三分之一的患者也会复发(2,3,4,5)。不幸的是,尽管手术技术和新型化学治疗剂有所进步,但在过去25年中存活率并未显着提高(2,6)。胎上抗原是由人类肿瘤产生的一组特殊标志物,这些抗原已在血清中检测到妇科癌症患者此类标记物在诊断和随访中的实际应用受到其测试灵敏度低和特异性低的限制(6)。癌胚抗原(CEA)是最早已知的肿瘤标记物之一。从那时起,已经描述了更多的方法,但是单独或与其他方法组合使用的CEA仍然是最常用的方法之一。 CEA不是器官特异性的,在许多癌中都可能发现异常值(7)。已知上皮性卵巢癌

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号