首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics >Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments
【24h】

Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments

机译:基台直径,引诱剂类型和再粘接对短基台上植入物支持的CAD / CAM金属帽保留的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of abutment diameter, cement type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty abutments with two different diameters, the height of which was reduced to 3 mm, were vertically mounted in acrylic resin blocks with matching implant analogues. The specimens were divided into 2 diameter groups: 4.5 mm and 5.5 mm (n=30). For each abutment a CAD/CAM metal coping was manufactured, with an occlusal loop. Each group was sub-divided into 3 sub-groups (n=10). In each subgroup, a different cement type was used: resin-modified glass-ionomer, resin cement and zinc-oxide-eugenol. After incubation and thermocycling, the removal force was measured using a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. In zinc-oxide-eugenol group, after removal of the coping, the cement remnants were completely cleaned and the copings were re-cemented with resin cement and re-tested. Two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey tests, and paired t-test were used to analyze data (α=.05). RESULTS The highest pulling force was registered in the resin cement group (414.8 N), followed by the re-cementation group (380.5 N). Increasing the diameter improved the retention significantly ( P =.006). The difference in retention between the cemented and recemented copings was not statistically significant ( P =.40). CONCLUSION Resin cement provided retention almost twice as strong as that of the RMGI. Increasing the abutment diameter improved retention significantly. Re-cementation with resin cement did not exhibit any difference from the initial cementation with resin cement.
机译:目的这项研究的目的是评估基台直径,水泥类型和再粘接对短基台上种植体支持的CAD / CAM金属顶盖保留的影响。材料和方法将具有两个不同直径的六十个基台(高度降低到3毫米)垂直安装在丙烯酸树脂块中,并带有类似的植入物类似物。将样本分为2个直径组:4.5毫米和5.5毫米(n = 30)。对于每个基台,都制作了带有咬合环的CAD / CAM金属顶盖。每个组又细分为3个子组(n = 10)。在每个子组中,使用不同的水泥类型:树脂改性的玻璃离聚物,树脂水泥和氧化锌丁子香酚。孵育和热循环后,使用通用测试机以0.5 mm / min的十字头速度测量去除力。在氧化锌-丁香酚组中,去除顶盖后,水泥残渣被完全清除,顶盖用树脂水泥重新水泥并重新测试。双向ANOVA,事后Tukey检验和配对t检验用于分析数据(α= .05)。结果树脂水泥组的拉力最高(414.8 N),再水泥组的拉力最高(380.5 N)。增大直径可显着提高保留率(P = .006)。骨水泥帽和骨水泥帽之间的固位差异无统计学意义(P = .40)。结论树脂水泥的固位力几乎是RMGI的两倍。增大基台直径可显着改善固位力。用树脂胶结剂进行的再胶结与用树脂胶结剂进行的初始胶结没有任何区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号