首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics >Prior Term Birth Weight: Is It Useful for Predicting Fetal Weight in Subsequent Pregnancies?
【24h】

Prior Term Birth Weight: Is It Useful for Predicting Fetal Weight in Subsequent Pregnancies?

机译:足月出生体重:可以预测随后的胎儿体重吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between birth weights in successive pregnancies.Methods: Successive, full-term pregnancies were examined in 54 non-diabetic, non-hypertensive women. Birth weights in prior pregnancies were used to predict subsequent birth weights, both alone and after correcting for differences in gestational age and fetal gender between the two pregnancies.Results: Prior birth weight predicted subsequent birth weight with a correlation of 0.39 and a mean absolute prediction error of ±330 g (±9.6%). Correcting for changes in gestational age and fetal gender increased the correlation to 0.51 and reduced the mean absolute prediction error to ±291 g (±8.4%). Conclusions: Term birth weight in multiparous women can be predicted to within ±291 g (±8.4%) using only prior birth weight and two other variables that describe the current and preceding pregnancies. This routinely available information may explain why mothers can estimate the birth weights of their current fetuses with reasonable accuracy. Introduction Recently, it has been reported that pregnant women are able to predict the birth weight of their offspring with an accuracy ranging from ±305-402 g (±8.7-11.5%) at term. 1,2,3,4,5 By contrast, obstetrician's abilities to predict birth weight using clinical palpation have ranged between ±277-336 g (±7.5-10.3%), 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and when obstetrical ultrasonography is employed, it's accuracy has ranged between ±285-564 g (±8.2-15.6%) in the same and similar studies. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9This study was undertaken to examine the paired birth weights of term offspring born to non-diabetic, non-hypertensive women who had two deliveries within a four-year period at a single academic institution in the United States. In addition, a prediction model was developed for estimating term fetal weight based on a combination of factors during the current and prior pregnancies to address the question of whether multiparous women can make birth weight estimations based on the integration of routinely available pregnancy-specific information that can also potentially be used by clinicians. Subjects and Methods The women included for study were delivered between August 1998 and April 2001 by one of the general obstetrical faculty practices within the Duke University Health System. All subjects were delivered at Duke University Hospital (elevation 106 m) and all were private patients. Approximately 700 women were delivered by this group during this period. Sixty-one of these women had term deliveries between 37-42 weeks of gestation and were also identified as having prior term deliveries at Duke University Hospital. The medical records of these patients were reviewed retrospectively to extract the following information for both pregnancies: maternal age, gravidity, parity, pre-pregnancy weight, final pregnancy weight, 50-g 1-hr glucose screening test result, 100-g 3-hr glucose tolerance test results (when necessary), medical illnesses, complications of pregnancy, fetal gender, birth weight, all standard pregnancy dating criteria, and maternal height and race.This study made use of archival, de-identified patient information that was obtained before 2003. The study was retrospective in nature and had no impact on either the routine clinical care that was provided or to the type of information that was gathered. Thus, it conforms to the standards established by the NHMRC for ethical quality review 10 and was exempted from institutional review board evaluation.During their prior pregnancies, two patients were diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Both were eliminated from further analysis due to the significant and highly variable effect of this condition on fetal weight. 11 Two additional patients were diagnosed with mild pre-eclampsia (1 in a prior and 1 in a subsequent pregnancy), and three others were diagnosed with chronic hypertension (2 in a prior and 1 in a subsequent pregnancy). These five patients were also eliminated f
机译:目的:探讨连续妊娠中出生体重之间的关系。方法:对54名非糖尿病,非高血压妇女进行连续,足月妊娠检查。先前的妊娠体重被用来预测随后的出生体重,既可以单独使用,也可以在校正两个怀孕之间的胎龄和胎儿性别差异后进行预测。结果:先前的出生体重可以预测后续的出生体重,其相关系数为0.39,且平均绝对预测为误差为±330 g(±9.6%)。校正胎龄和胎儿性别的变化可将相关性提高至0.51,并将平均绝对预测误差降低至±291 g(±8.4%)。结论:仅使用先前的出生体重和描述当前和先前妊娠的其他两个变量,可以预测多胎妇女的足月出生体重在±291 g(±8.4%)以内。这种常规可获得的信息可以解释为什么母亲可以合理准确地估计其当前胎儿的出生体重。引言最近,有报道说孕妇在足月时能够预测其后代的出生体重,准确度范围为±305-402 g(±8.7-11.5%)。 1,2,3,4,5相比之下,妇产科医生通过临床触诊预测出生体重的能力介于±277-336 g(±7.5-10.3%),1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ,8,9,而在使用产科超声检查时,在相同和相似的研究中,其准确性介于±285-564 g(±8.2-15.6%)之间。 3,4,5,6,7,8,9这项研究旨在检查非糖尿病,非高血压妇女的足月后代的成对体重,这些妇女在一个单一的学术机构中在四年内分两次分娩在美国。此外,还开发了一种预测模型,用于基于当前和先前怀孕期间的多种因素来估算足月胎儿体重,以解决以下问题:多胎妇女是否可以基于常规可用的特定于妊娠的信息的整合来估算出生体重也可以由临床医生使用。受试者和方法1998年8月至2001年4月之间,由杜克大学卫生系统内的一名普通产科实践人员分娩了纳入研究的妇女。所有受试者均在杜克大学医院(海拔106 m)分娩,均为私人患者。在此期间,该小组分娩了大约700名妇女。这些妇女中有61名在妊娠37-42周之间有足月分娩,并且在杜克大学医院也被确定为有足月分娩。回顾性地回顾了这些患者的病历,以提取以下两种妊娠的信息:产妇年龄,妊娠率,胎次,孕前体重,最终妊娠体重,50克1小时葡萄糖筛查结果,100克3 hr糖耐量测试结果(必要时),内科疾病,妊娠并发症,胎儿性别,出生体重,所有标准妊娠约会标准以及孕产妇身高和种族。这项研究利用了已获得档案的,身份不明的患者信息2003年之前。这项研究具有回顾性,对所提供的常规临床护理或所收集信息的类型均没有影响。因此,它符合NHMRC制定的道德质量审查标准10,并且不受机构审查委员会评估。在他们先前怀孕期间,有两名患者被诊断出患有妊娠糖尿病。由于这种情况对胎儿体重的显着和高度可变的影响,两者都被排除在进一步分析之外。 11另外两名患者被诊断为轻度先兆子痫(先前妊娠1例,随后妊娠1例),另外三例被诊断为慢性高血压(先前妊娠2例,随后妊娠1例)。这五名患者也被淘汰

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号