首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Microbiology >Diversity Of Culturable Bacteria On Natural Vs Artifical Fabrics
【24h】

Diversity Of Culturable Bacteria On Natural Vs Artifical Fabrics

机译:天然细菌与人工织物上可培养细菌的多样性

获取原文
       

摘要

Bacterial sampling of clothing worn by a class of undergraduate microbiology students was performed over the course of one month. Microorganisms were cultured on nutrient agar, visually distinct colonies were subcultured, and subcultured colonies were tested for alpha haemolyic properties. Significant differences were found between the number of visually differentiable types of colony forming units on natural and artificial textiles, with mean diversity of cfus on artificial textiles exceeding those on natural by a factor of 2.3. Significant differences in the number of organisms capable of alpha haemolysis were also noted, with mean levels of such organisms on artificial textiles exceeding those on natural by a factor of 3.7. Introduction Clinical practices are important in reducing rates of nosocomial infection. Many studies have been done related to patient-centered aspects of nosocomial infection. For example, it is known that adherence to hand washing protocols results in reduced rates of nosocomial infection (1). Fomites also have the potential to transmit infection. Studies have shown that approximately 25% of the white coats worn by health care workers carry Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains of the organism (2,3). Neckties have also been implicated as potential vectors, although conclusions as to the risks they present vary (4,5). They are no longer recommended for clinical wear in the UK (4). The above referenced studies examine fomites such as white coats and neckties without breakdown as to material composition or microorganismal diversity. There is evidence to suggest that the type of textile used in clothing has a significant impact on the type and number of microorganisms that colonize the object. Microorganism populations have a significant impact on infection. Understanding these populations may allow superior control of nosocomial infections.It is known that polyester and acrylic fibers bind Gram negative and Gram positive organisms at ratios exceeding 80%, whereas cotton fibers bind these organisms at ratios less than 10% (6). Synthetic textiles have been shown to collect more bacterial mass than cellulose-based textiles (7). It has also been shown that while cellulose-based textiles are mostly colonized by bacteria normally found in human sweat, such as members of Propionibacteria, Corynebacteria, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus, while synthetic textiles are frequently colonized by genera that are not found in human sweat (8,7).Studies addressing the type and quantity of bacteria that colonize textiles relative to their material composition have previously been done on textile and fiber samples under strictly controlled laboratory, ie in vitro conditions, usually with known quantities of microorganisms being artificially introduced to the fabric sample. This study looks at the relationship between the diversity of organisms on clothing and the type of material of which the clothing is composed under more typical, ie in vivo conditions, wherein the textiles sampled were worn by human beings during normal use, and acquired populations of microorganisms under real world conditions. Materials and Methods In order to test if clothing composition affected the number of bacteria carried on that clothing, undergraduate students in a microbiology class at Illinois Wesleyan University examined the relationship between the number of organisms found on the cuffs of their classmates’ sleeves and the material of which the clothing was made. Study participants gave informed consent; samples were anonymized and records relating individuals to their samples were destroyed. Damp, sterile swabs were used to sample the bottom-most two inches of the sleeves of participants every class period. Material composition of the garments was recorded. If clothing was composed entirely of plant or animal-based fibers, it was recorded as a “natural fiber”. If clothing was composed all or in part of artificial
机译:一类本科微生物学学生所穿衣服的细菌抽样进行了一个月的过程。将微生物在营养琼脂上培养,将视觉上不同的菌落继代培养,然后对继代培养的菌落进行α溶血特性测试。在天然和人造纺织品上,视觉上可区分类型的菌落形成单位的数量之间存在显着差异,人造纺织品上的cfus平均多样性比天然纺织品上的cfus平均多样性高2.3倍。还指出了能够进行α溶血的生物数量上的显着差异,人造纺织品上此类生物的平均水平比天然纺织品上的平均水平高出3.7倍。简介临床实践对降低医院感染率很重要。已经进行了许多与以患者为中心的医院感染有关的研究。例如,众所周知,遵守洗手程序会导致医院感染率降低(1)。 Fomites还具有传播感染的潜力。研究表明,医护人员穿的白大衣中约有25%带有金黄色葡萄球菌,包括耐甲氧西林的生物体(2,3)。领带也被认为是潜在的媒介,尽管关于它们所带来的风险的结论也有所不同(4,5)。在英国,不再建议将它们用于临床佩戴(4)。以上引用的研究检查了诸如白大衣和领带等的炸药,未发现其物质组成或微生物多样性。有证据表明,用于服装的纺织品的类型对定居在该物体上的微生物的类型和数量有重大影响。微生物种群对感染有重大影响。了解这些人群可能可以更好地控制医院感染。众所周知,聚酯纤维和丙烯酸纤维以超过80%的比率结合革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性生物,而棉纤维以不到10%的比率结合这些微生物(6)。与纤维素基纺织品相比,合成纺织品已显示出更多的细菌聚集(7)。研究还表明,虽然纤维素纺织品大多被人类汗液中通常存在的细菌(例如丙酸杆菌,棒状杆菌,葡萄球菌和链球菌)所定殖,而合成纺织品通常被人类汗液中未发现的属所定殖( 8,7。)以前已经在严格控制的实验室(即体外条件下)对纺织品和纤维样品进行过研究,研究了定居在纺织品上的细菌相对于其材料组成的类型和数量,通常是将已知数量的微生物人工引入织物样品。这项研究着眼于服装的生物多样性与服装的材料类型之间的关系。服装的材料类型在更典型的条件下,即在体内条件下,其中采样的纺织品在正常使用过程中被人类穿着,并且获得了现实条件下的微生物。材料和方法为了测试衣服的成分是否影响衣服上携带的细菌的数量,伊利诺伊州卫斯理大学的微生物学课程的本科生检查了同学袖口袖口上发现的生物数量与材料之间的关系。其中的衣服是制成的。研究参与者给出了知情同意;样本被匿名化,与个人有关的记录被销毁。在每堂课期间,使用潮湿的无菌棉签对参与者的袖子的最底部两英寸进行采样。记录服装的材料组成。如果服装完全由植物或动物纤维组成,则被记录为“天然纤维”。如果衣服是全部或部分是人造的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号