首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Microbiology >Effect of various solvents on bacterial growth in context of determining MIC of various antimicrobials
【24h】

Effect of various solvents on bacterial growth in context of determining MIC of various antimicrobials

机译:在确定各种抗菌药物的MIC的情况下,各种溶剂对细菌生长的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and ethanol are frequently used as solvent for natural as well as synthetic antibacterial compounds, in order to determine their MICs. Effect of these solvents on bacterial growth is an important factor to be considered, while considering reproducibility of experiments for MIC determination. Present study aimed at determining the effect of different concentrations (1% to 6%) of DMSO, ethanol, and methanol on the growth of five different bacteria. DMSO scored better followed by methanol and ethanol, in terms of their compatibility with MIC determination. Lower concentrations of solvents, which apparently do not affect the bacterial growth significantly, may still potentiate the effect of antibacterial compound under test. Introduction Due to rising incidence of drug resistance among pathogenic bacteria, new antibacterial compounds are constantly being searched5. Potency of any newly reported antibacterial preparation can be quantified and compared with those already known by determining its MIC value. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is defined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent required to inhibit growth of a test organism over a defined interval related to the organism’s growth rate, most commonly 18 to 24 h. MIC has been accepted as the most basic laboratory measurement of the activity of an antimicrobial agent against an organism7.Conventionally broth dilution method is applied for measuring the MIC. It requires preparing various dilutions of the compound under test in a suitable solvent. In case of natural products, generally extraction is carried out using solvents of varying polarity, ethanol and methanol are most commonly applied. To quantify antimicrobial activities, extracts have to be dried. Frequently it is difficult to resolubilize extracts even in the solvent originally used. In serial dilution assay the solvent has to be miscible with water. Water frequently doesn’t dissolve the intermediate polarity or non-polar components of a dried extract. An alternative is to use solvents such as methanol, ethanol or DMSO. Selection of appropriate solvent is one of the most significant factors which can influence MIC measurements in vitro. Ethanol3 and DMSO6 are preferred since they are miscible with water. DMSO is a highly polar, stable substance with exceptional solvent property6. However, DMSO1, ethanol4 and other solvents used in various bioassays have been reported for their antimicrobial effect2. Thus it becomes essential to ensure that the final concentration of the organic solvent is not likely to interfere with the bioassay (MIC determination). It should also be noted that each organism may exert varying susceptibility to these solvents.Present study aimed at determining the effect of different concentrations (1% to 6%) of DMSO, ethanol, and methanol on the growth of five common bacterial pathogens. Materials and Methods Microorganisms Staphylococcus epidermidis MTCC 435, Pseudomonas oleovorans MTCC 617, Vibrio cholerae MTCC 3906, Shigella flexneri MTCC 1457 and Salmonella paratyphi A were used as test organisms. All the bacterial strains except Salmonella paratyphi A were obtained from the Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Chandigarh, India. S. paratyphi A was obtained from the Microbiology Dept., Gujarat University, Ahmedabad.Growth MediumMueller Hinton (MH) Broth (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) Solvents Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (sd fine chemicals Ltd., Mumbai, India), methanol (Merck, Mumbai, India), and ethanol (Baroda chemical industries Ltd, Vadodara, India). ProcedureVarying volumes of MH broth and respective solvent were mixed in different test tubes (table 1) so that concentration of the solvent ranged from 1-6 % v/v. To this was added 500 μL of inoculum, which was prepared from overnight growth of the test organism, so as to match the turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard. Total volume in each of the tube was thus made 2 mL. A tube containing growth medium (1
机译:二甲基亚砜(DMSO)和乙醇经常用作天然和合成抗菌化合物的溶剂,以确定其MIC。这些溶剂对细菌生长的影响是要考虑的重要因素,同时还要考虑用于MIC测定的实验可重复性。本研究旨在确定不同浓度(1%至6%)的DMSO,乙醇和甲醇对5种不同细菌生长的影响。在与MIC测定的相容性方面,DMSO得分更高,其次是甲醇和乙醇。较低浓度的溶剂(显然不会明显影响细菌的生长)可能仍会增强被测抗菌化合物的作用。引言由于致病细菌中耐药性的发生率不断上升,因此不断寻找新的抗菌化合物5。可以量化任何新报告的抗菌制剂的药效,并通过确定其MIC值与已知药物进行比较。最低抑菌浓度(MIC)定义为在与微生物的生长速度有关的特定时间间隔内(最通常为18至24小时)抑制测试生物生长所需的最低抗菌剂浓度。 MIC已被认为是抗菌剂对生物体活性最基本的实验室测量方法。传统上采用肉汤稀释法测量MIC。它需要在合适的溶剂中制备各种稀释的待测化合物。对于天然产品,通常使用极性不同的溶剂进行萃取,最常使用乙醇和甲醇。为了量化抗菌活性,必须将提取物干燥。通常,即使在最初使用的溶剂中也很难使提取物再溶解。在连续稀释测定中,溶剂必须与水混溶。水通常不会溶解干提取物的中间极性或非极性成分。一种替代方法是使用溶剂,例如甲醇,乙醇或DMSO。选择合适的溶剂是最重要的因素之一,可以影响体外MIC的测量。乙醇3和DMSO 6是优选的,因为它们可与水混溶。 DMSO是一种高极性,稳定的物质,具有出色的溶剂性能6。然而,已报道了各种生物测定中使用的DMSO1,乙醇4和其他溶剂的抗微生物作用2。因此,确保有机溶剂的最终浓度不太可能干扰生物测定(MIC测定)变得至关重要。还应注意的是,每种生物对这些溶剂的敏感性不同。目前的研究旨在确定不同浓度(1%至6%)的DMSO,乙醇和甲醇对5种常见细菌病原体生长的影响。材料和方法微生物表皮葡萄球菌MTCC 435,油假单胞菌MTCC 617,霍乱弧菌MTCC 3906,弗氏志贺氏菌MTCC 1457和副伤寒沙门氏菌A被用作测试生物。除副伤寒沙门氏菌A以外的所有细菌菌株均来自印度昌迪加尔的微生物类型培养物保藏中心(MTCC)。副伤寒沙门氏菌A获自艾哈迈达巴德古吉拉特大学微生物系。生长培养基Mueller Hinton(MH)Broth(HiMedia,印度孟买)溶剂二甲基亚砜(DMSO)(sd Fine Chemicals Ltd.,印度孟买),甲醇(印度孟买的默克(Merck)和印度瓦多达拉(Vadodara)的Baroda化学工业有限公司)。步骤将不同体积的MH肉汤和相应的溶剂混合在不同的试管中(表1),以使溶剂浓度范围为1-6%v / v。向其中添加500μL接种物,该接种物是由受试生物过夜生长而制备的,以匹配0.5 McFarland标准液的浊度。因此使每个管中的总体积为2mL。装有生长培养基的试管(1

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号