首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Microbiology >How safe is the safe water supply?
【24h】

How safe is the safe water supply?

机译:安全供水有多安全?

获取原文
       

摘要

A total of 1200 drinking water samples from various water sources in Amritsar district, were analyzed to assess bacteriological quality of water. Presumptive coliform count by multiple tube test was done. The study revealed that 570 (47.5%) samples were unfit for human consumption. Of all the samples tested, 63/110(57.3%) samples from religious places, 28/56(50%) from hospitals, 25/50(50%) from bus stands/railway stations, 84/190(44.4%) from schools, 32/100(32%) from BSF checkposts, 5/19(26.5%) from hotels and 3/25(12%) from ice factories were found to be unsatisfactory. Out of the 570 unsatisfactory samples detected, 72% samples from submersible pumps,50% from hand pumps, 45.4% from taps,29.2% from tube wells and 28.5% from domestic tap supply were found to be contaminated. On Eijkman test 20/25(80%) of the suspicious samples turned out to be unsatisfactory. So, availability of safe drinking water still remains a much sought after commodity for majority of public in developing countries like India. Source of support: Govt. of Punjab (India) Introduction Water, the elixir of life is getting polluted due to rapidly increasing population, urbanization, construction of new buildings and deforestation. Water pollution is becoming a global problem threatening human existence .Water contamination occurs from human, animal and industrial wastes mixing into it. They contain a variety of bacterial, viral, protozoan pathogens and helminth parasites along with chemical pollutants. Consumption of such unsafe drinking water may expose a high proportion of the community to the risk of outbreaks of intestinal and other infectious diseases (1) .In fact, more people would die of consuming unsafe drinking water and unsanitary conditions by the year 2020 than from AIDS, if steps to improve water quality are not taken on war footing (2) Ideally, drinking water should not contain any micro organisms which are known to be pathogenic. It should be free from bacteria indicative of faecal pollution. The primary bacterial indicator recommended for this purpose is the coliform group of organisms (3) In themselves, coliforms are not dangerous but their presence indicates that the fecal matter has entered the water supply, and fecal bacteria have not been removed or killed by the purification processes. Therefore the water supply is liable to contamination with dangerous intestinal pathogens (4) So, in the interest of public health water supplies (piped/unpiped) and samples from distribution sources must be checked from time to time to ensure that safe quality drinking water is supplied to the public (5). In fact, much of the ill health which affects humanity especially in developing countries can be traced back to lack of safe and wholesome water supply. There can be no state of positive health and well being without safe water (2). The present study was therefore undertaken to analyse the water samples from various sources for the presence of coliforms. Aims/Objectives The present study was conducted with the objective of assessing the bacteriological quality of water in different drinking water sources in Amritsar District (India). Materials And Methods A total of 1200 drinking water samples from taps of piped supply (550), hand pumps (380),submersible pumps (125 ),tube well(120) and ice factories (25)from various places in Amritsar district received during the period of Jan 2007 to Dec,2008 were analyzed in Microbiology Department of Govt. Medical College, Amritsar.The samples were received in sterilized, standard, specified glass bottles of 230 cc capacity along with properly filled prescribed proforma. The samples were received, stored (in case of delay) and processed in accordance with the guidelines described in standard methods (6). Presumptive coliform count test based on multiple tube fermentation method by Senior BW was used to estimate the most probable number of coliform organisms in 100 ml of water for diagnosis of bacteriological contamina
机译:总共对来自阿姆利则地区各种水源的1200个饮用水样本进行了分析,以评估水的细菌学质量。通过多管测试推定大肠菌群计数。研究显示,有570个(47.5%)样本不适合人类食用。在所有测试样本中,来自宗教场所的样本为63/110(57.3%),来自医院的样本为28/56(50%),来自公共汽车站/火车站的25/50(50%),来自宗教场所的84/190(44.4%)学校发现,来自BSF检查站的32/100(32%),来自酒店的5/19(26.5%)和来自制冰厂的3/25(12%)不能令人满意。在检测到的570个不满意的样本中,发现潜水泵的样本占72%,手动泵的样本占50%,水龙头的样本占45.4%,管井的样本占29.2%,家用水龙头的样本占28.5%。在Eijkman测试中,有20/25(80%)的可疑样本被证明不令人满意。因此,对于像印度这样的发展中国家的大多数公众来说,获得安全饮用水仍然是人们追捧的商品。支持来源:政府。印度旁遮普邦(Punjab)简介人口的快速增长,城市化,新建筑的建设和森林砍伐,使生命的灵丹妙药受到水的污染。水污染正在成为威胁人类生存的全球性问题。水污染源于人类,动物和工业废物的混入。它们包含各种细菌,病毒,原生动物病原体和蠕虫寄生虫以及化学污染物。饮用这种不安全的饮用水可能会使社区中很大一部分人面临肠道和其他传染病暴发的风险(1)。事实上,到2020年,死于饮用不安全的饮用水和不卫生状况的人数将超过如果在战争的基础上不采取改善水质的措施,艾滋病(2)理想情况下,饮用水中不应含有任何已知可致病的微生物。它应该没有指示粪便污染的细菌。为此目的推荐的主要细菌指示剂是大肠菌群(3)本身,大肠菌群并不危险,但是它们的存在表明粪便已进入供水系统,并且粪便细菌尚未通过纯化而去除或杀死。流程。因此,供水容易受到危险的肠道病原体的污染(4)。因此,为了公共卫生用水(管道/非管道)的利益,必须不时检查分配来源的样品,以确保获得安全质量的饮用水。提供给公众(5)。实际上,许多影响人类的不良健康,尤其是在发展中国家,可以追溯到缺乏安全和有益健康的水供应。没有安全的饮用水就不可能有积极健康的状态(2)。因此,本研究旨在分析各种来源的水样中是否存在大肠菌。目的/目的进行本研究的目的是评估印度阿姆利则地区不同饮用水源中水的细菌学质量。材料和方法从阿姆利则地区不同地方的管道供水(550),手动泵(380),潜水泵(125),管井(120)和制冰厂(25)的水龙头中总共采集了1200个饮用水样品。在政府微生物学部门对2007年1月至2008年12月的时间进行了分析。阿姆利则医学院(Amritsar),将样品放入经过消毒的标准指定玻璃瓶中,容量为230 cc,并装有适当填充的处方形式。按照标准方法(6)中所述的指导原则接收,存储样品(以防万一)。使用高级BW基于多管发酵法的大肠菌群计数测试来估计100毫升水中最可能的大肠菌群数量,以诊断细菌性污染

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号