首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Pain, Symptom Control and Palliative Care >The Need for Patient Teaching, Follow Up, and Physician Availability for the Prevention of Outpatient Perineural Catheter Complications
【24h】

The Need for Patient Teaching, Follow Up, and Physician Availability for the Prevention of Outpatient Perineural Catheter Complications

机译:需要患者教学,随访和医师可得性,以预防门诊神经鞘管并发症

获取原文
           

摘要

Perineural catheters have influenced the way we manage postoperative pain and sometimes require us to care for patients beyond the postoperative period on an outpatient basis. We have found that while appropriate instruction, follow up and physician availability are essential in the management of outpatient perineural catheters, patient misunderstanding or noncompliance contributes to complications. Here we report such a misunderstanding with a complication. Introduction Perineural catheters have begun to influence the way we manage postoperative pain.1-2 With this approach to pain management, we often find ourselves caring for patients beyond the immediate postoperative period. More recently, the use of perineural catheters in the outpatient setting has extended our role in pain management even further.3-4 As we implement new techniques in regional anesthesia and expand our role in caring for patients in the days following surgery, we are likely to encounter new complications that result from these advances in regional anesthesia.5-11 Swenson et al. described their experience with 620 outpatient perineural catheters. Their outpatient management included appropriate discharge instructions, patient follow up, and physician availability for patient contact. Last year, our institution placed 338 outpatient perineural catheters. Through this experience, we have found that while appropriate instruction, follow up and physician availability are essential in the management of outpatient perineural catheters, patient misunderstanding or noncompliance contributes to complications. In this report we highlight the need for the continued effective engagement of the care team through the immediate postoperative period of an outpatient who had been discharged with a perineural catheter. Case Report A 46-year-old ASA I male presented for outpatient left anterior cruciate ligament repair. Following the surgery, he received a femoral perineural catheter in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). It was uneventfully placed with a 17 G Tuohy needle in a strict sterile fashion under ultrasound guidance. Twenty ml of 0.2% ropivicaine was injected directly through the Tuohy needle to dilate the perineural space. An in-plane approach was used with the probe just below the femoral crease, providing a cross-sectional view of the femoral vessels and nerve. A 19 G Arrow Stimucath Continuous Nerve Block Catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA, USA) was inserted approximately 3 cm past the tip of the needle, allowing it to slightly curve posterior to the femoral nerve without forming a loop. An additional 10 ml of .2% ropivicaine was injected through the catheter to verify correct placement with ultrasound guidance. The catheter was secured at the insertion site using a skin adhesive and a sterile dressing was applied. An On-Q elastomeric pump (I-flow, Lake Forest, CA, USA) containing 550 ml of 0.1% ropivicaine was set to deliver 10 ml/hr with a demand button allowing 5 ml of local anesthetic every 30 minutes. Prior to discharge from the PACU, the patient was given written and verbal instructions on catheter care and discharged home. The discharge instructions included the manner in which to contact an anesthesiologist if any problems arose. The patient was also instructed to remove the catheter after the pump was depleted of local anesthetic, which should occur no later than postoperative day (POD) #3. On POD #1, the patient began to feel pain in his knee and noticed that his demand button wasn’t working correctly. Upon examination of the bag containing the pump, he discovered a severed section of tubing that had resulted in spillage of the local anesthetic into the bag. He disconnected the pump tubing from the catheter and discarded it. Unfortunately, the patient misunderstood the discharge instructions and thought the catheter needed to remain inserted for three full days. A registered nurse followed up with the patient on POD #1 via a message on his
机译:神经导管已经影响了我们处理术后疼痛的方式,有时需要我们在门诊基础上对术后期以外的患者进行护理。我们发现,尽管适当的指导,随访和医师的可用性对门诊患者神经导管的管理至关重要,但患者的误会或不依从会导致并发症。在这里,我们报道这样的误解和并发症。简介会阴导管已开始影响我们处理术后疼痛的方式。1-2通过这种疼痛控制方法,我们经常发现自己会在术后即刻护理患者。最近,在门诊患者中使用神经导管进一步扩大了我们在疼痛管理中的作用。3-4随着我们在区域麻醉中实施新技术并在术后几天内扩大对患者的护理中, 5-11 Swenson等人。描述了他们使用620个门诊神经导管的经验。他们的门诊管理包括适当的出院指导,病人随访以及医生与病人接触的机会。去年,我们机构放置了338个门诊神经导管。通过这种经验,我们发现,尽管适当的指导,随访和医生的可用性对于门诊患者神经导管的管理至关重要,但患者的误会或不依从会导致并发症。在本报告中,我们强调了需要护理人员在使用神经导管进行出院的患者术后即刻进行的持续有效参与。病例报告一名46岁的ASA I男性因门诊左前交叉韧带修复而出现。手术后,他在麻醉后护理病房(PACU)接受了一条股神经导管。在超声引导下,以严格的无菌方式将其用17 G Tuohy针均匀地放置。通过Tuohy针直接注射20 ml的0.2%罗哌卡因,以扩大神经周间隙。探头位于股骨折痕下方时使用了平面内方法,提供了股血管和神经的横截面图。将一根19 G Arrow Stimucath连续神经阻滞导管(美国宾夕法尼亚州雷丁市,Arrow International公司)插入到针尖后约3 cm处,使其在股神经后部略微弯曲而不形成环。通过导管再注射10 ml的.2%罗哌卡因,以验证在超声引导下的正确放置。使用皮肤粘合剂将导管固定在插入部位,并应用无菌敷料。装有550毫升0.1%罗哌卡因的On-Q弹性体泵(I-flow,美国加利福尼亚州)设置为以10毫升/小时的速度输送,并配有按需按钮,每30分钟可使用5毫升局部麻醉剂。在从PACU出院之前,已向患者提供了有关导管护理的书面和口头说明,并已出院。出院说明中包括出现任何问题时与麻醉师联系的方式。还指示患者在泵用完局麻药后取出导管,这种麻醉应不迟于术后第3天(POD)。在POD#1上,患者开始感到膝盖疼痛,并注意到其按需按钮无法正常工作。在检查装有泵的袋子时,他发现一根被割断的管子导致局麻药溢出到袋子中。他从导管上拆下泵管,将其丢弃。不幸的是,患者误解了排出说明,并认为导管需要保持插入整整三天。注册护士通过POD#1上的消息跟进患者

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号