【24h】

February Focus

机译:二月焦点

获取原文
       

摘要

According to the study on page 87, GPs are enjoying work again as much as they were in 1998, at least those in England, and at least in 1994. The majority are satisfied with the job they do, though they report a lot of pressure, some dissatisfaction with the hours of work, and a feeling that there isn't enough time to do justice to the job. The study also confirms one's instinctive expectation that being involved in decisions at work is associated with higher levels of satisfaction. All of this was happening just before the contract changed, so the doctors involved were all still responsible for 24-hour care. Relinquishing the 24-hour responsibility may have made GPs' lives in the UK easier, and have led to higher rates of job satisfaction, but Jim Cox, who no longer works in clinical medicine, fears that we have made a huge error by giving it up (page 83). It's possible for others to do this job without increasing the risks to patients, but it marks a significant shift in the kind of work we are asked to do, and he thinks that we no longer qualify as practitioners of family medicine according to the European WONCA definition. In my practice at least we are wondering how we can be effective commissioners of secondary care if we only guard the gate into secondary care for approximately a third of the working week. Nor will readers be surprised that general practice is not seen as a particularly attractive career option when students graduate (page 134) with the proportion opting to take it up increasing from 18% on graduation in 1995 to 33% after 10 years. The reasons given for the switch predominantly were hours of work and domestic responsibilities; no more surprising, perhaps, than the mere 20% who gave as one reason ‘Enjoy current work’. If, as would be predicted, such reasons for entering primary care continue, then the likelihood of GPs ever taking back the responsibility for 24-hour care is negligible. Most GPs will rejoice, but every change will have unforeseen consequences. For instance, the current contract has the air of reducing us to box-ticking ciphers, and that is making at least one potential recruit think again (page 140). When it's combined with a strict approach to planning and evaluating doctors' personal and professional development, it may be inhibiting the kind of broader approach to education that most of us would want to encourage (page 143). Like so many other aspects of primary care, they manage these things so much better in the Netherlands, although there too they view the future with some concern (page 144). Perhaps we should all take out a subscription to the Journal of Happiness Studies (page 145).
机译:根据第87页的研究,全科医生正享受着与1998年一样多的工作,至少在英格兰和1994年是如此。大多数人对他们所做的工作感到满意,尽管他们承受着很大的压力,对工作时间的不满,以及没有足够的时间对工作进行公义的感觉。这项研究还证实了人们的本能期望,即参与工作中的决策会带来更高的满意度。所有这些都是在合同变更之前发生的,因此相关的医生仍然负责24小时护理。放弃24小时责任制可能使全科医生在英国的生活变得更轻松,并提高了工作满意度,但是不再从事临床医学工作的吉姆·考克斯(Jim Cox)担心,我们给它带来了巨大的错误向上(第83页)。其他人可以在不增加患者风险的情况下完成这项工作,但这标志着我们被要求从事的工作方式发生了重大转变,他认为根据欧洲WONCA,我们不再有资格担任家庭医学从业者定义。至少在我的实践中,我们想知道,如果我们仅在大约三分之一的工作周内守卫进入二级保健的大门,如何才能成为有效的二级保健专员。当学生毕业(第134页)时,普通执业并没有被视为一种特别有吸引力的职业选择,读者选择这一比例也从1995年的18%增加到10年后的33%,这也不会令读者感到惊讶。做出这一改变的原因主要是工作时间和家庭责任。也许只有20%的人给出了“享受当前工作”这一理由,这并不奇怪。如果如预期的那样,进入基层医疗的原因继续存在,那么全科医生重新承担24小时护理责任的可能性就可以忽略不计。大多数GP都会欢欣鼓舞,但每次更改都会产生无法预料的后果。例如,目前的合同具有将我们简化为严格的密码的能力,这正在使至少一名潜在的新兵重新考虑(第140页)。当它与严格的规划和评估医生的个人和专业发展的方法相结合时,可能会抑制我们大多数人希望鼓励的更广泛的教育方法(第143页)。像初级保健的许多其他方面一样,他们在荷兰对这些事情的管理要好得多,尽管他们也对未来有一些担忧(第144页)。也许我们都应该订阅《幸福研究杂志》(第145页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号