【24h】

Immunisation policy: from compliance to concordance?

机译:免疫政策:从遵守到一致?

获取原文
       

摘要

Immunisation has proved a highly effective public health policy. However, it has come under public suspicion at times, with large falls in pertussis immunizations in the 1980s and smaller falls in measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine uptake recently. Immunisation scares have also occurred in other countries. This discussion paper explores the concepts of herd immunity, altruism, and informed consent. Historical, quantitative, and qualitative research on the sociology of immunisation is reviewed. Recent research has shown that the concerns of parents include a loss of trust in health professionals and increasing worries about side effects. The sociologist Streefland is the leader of the World Health Organisation Sociology and Immunisation Project. His concept of the five perspectives on immunisation is explained. Concordance is then described as a dialogue based on mutual respect between different perspectives. Finally, some suggestions are made for immunisation policy in the UK. Immunisation policy should move from the current situation, which largely assumes the passive compliance of the population, to a policy where people are actively involved and their views respected.
机译:免疫证明是一项非常有效的公共卫生政策。但是,它有时会受到公众的怀疑,在1980年代百日咳疫苗的接种率下降较大,而最近的麻疹,腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗吸收率下降幅度较小。其他国家也发生了免疫恐慌。本讨论文件探讨了群体免疫,利他主义和知情同意的概念。对免疫社会学的历史,定量和定性研究进行了综述。最近的研究表明,父母的担忧包括对保健专业人员的信任度下降以及对副作用的担忧增加。社会学家Streefland是世界卫生组织社会学和免疫项目的负责人。解释了他关于免疫的五个观点的概念。然后将一致性描述为基于不同观点之间相互尊重的对话。最后,对英国的免疫政策提出了一些建议。免疫政策应该从目前的情况转变为人们积极参与并尊重其观点的现状,目前这种情况在很大程度上假设人们是被动地服从人口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号