首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >A survey of access to medical services in nursing and residential homes in England.
【24h】

A survey of access to medical services in nursing and residential homes in England.

机译:一项对英格兰养老院和住宅中获得医疗服务的调查。

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Residential and nursing homes make major demands on NHS services. AIM: To investigate patterns of access to medical services for residents in homes for older people. DESIGN OF STUDY: Telephone survey. SETTING: All nursing and dual registered homes and one in four residential homes located in a stratified random sample of 72 English primary care group/trust (PCG/T) areas. METHOD: A structured questionnaire investigating home characteristics, numbers of general practitioners (GPs) or practices per home, homes' policies for registering new residents with GPs, existence of payments to GPs, GP services provided to homes, and access to specialist medical care. RESULTS: There were wide variations in the numbers of GPs providing services to individual homes; this was not entirely dependent on home size. Eight percent of homes paid local GPs for their services to residents; these were more likely to be nursing homes (33%) than residential homes (odds ratio [OR] = 10.82, [95% CI = 4.48 to 26.13], P<0.001) and larger homes (OR for a ten-bed increase = 1.51 [95% CI = 1.28 to 1.79], P<0.001). Larger homes were more likely to encourage residents to register with a 'home' GP (OR for a ten-bed increase = 1.16 [95% CI = 1.04 to 1.31], P = 0.009). Homes paying local GPs were more likely to receive one or more additional services, over and above GPs' core contractual obligations. Few homes had direct access to specialist clinicians. CONCLUSION: Extensive variations in homes' policies and local GP services raise serious questions about patient choice, levels of GP services and, above all, about equity between residents within homes, between homes and between those in homes and in the community.
机译:背景:住宅和养老院对NHS服务提出了主要要求。目的:调查老年人在家中居民获得医疗服务的方式。研究设计:电话调查。地点:位于72个英国初级保健团体/信托(PCG / T)地区的分层随机样本中的所有护理和双重注册房屋以及四分之一的住宅房屋。方法:一份结构化的调查表,调查家庭特征,每个家庭的全科医生(GP)或做法,家庭向GP登记新居民的政策,向GP支付的费用,向家庭提供的GP服务以及获得专科医疗服务。结果:为个别房屋提供服务的全科医生人数差异很大。这并不完全取决于房屋的大小。百分之八的房屋向当地全科医生支付了向居民提供的服务;与寄宿家庭相比,这些家庭更可能是养老院(33%)(赔率[OR] = 10.82,[95%CI = 4.48 to 26.13],P <0.001)和更大的住房(增加10张床的OR = 1.51 [95%CI = 1.28至1.79],P <0.001)。较大的房屋更有可能鼓励居民向“房屋” GP登记(OR为10床增加= 1.16 [95%CI = 1.04至1.31],P = 0.009)。除了GP的核心合同义务外,向本地GP支付的房屋更有可能获得一项或多项附加服务。很少有房屋可以直接与专科医生联系。结论:房屋政策和当地全科医生服务的广泛差异引发了严重的问题,涉及患者选择,全科医生服务水平,最重要的是有关房屋内,房屋之间以及房屋和社区之间的居民之间的公平性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号