首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Variation in prescribing of hypnotics, anxiolytics and antidepressants between 61 general practices.
【24h】

Variation in prescribing of hypnotics, anxiolytics and antidepressants between 61 general practices.

机译:在61种常规做法之间,对催眠药,抗焦虑药和抗抑郁药的处方有所不同。

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND. Although the desirability of reducing prescribing of hypnotics and anxiolytics has long been recognized, variation between practices in patterns of psychotropic drug prescribing has received little attention; factors underlying such variation are poorly understood. AIM. The study aimed to describe the extent of variation between general practices in the prescribing of hypnotics, anxiolytics and antidepressants; it also aimed to analyse the influence of measures of practice population and general practice and general practitioner characteristics on any variation in prescribing volumes. METHOD. Routinely collected prescribing data and practice population data, from April 1992 to March 1993, from all 61 practices in the Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Commission were analysed. Prescribing was measured as annual defined daily doses per 1000 practice population for each drug class. Data on variables relating to practice structure and general practitioner characteristics were obtained and analysed. Potentially influencing variables were investigated by multiple regression. RESULTS. Between the highest and lowest prescribing practices there was an 11-fold difference, a 13-fold difference and an eightfold difference in the annual defined daily doses per 1000 practice population prescribed for hypnotics, for anxiolytics and for antidepressants, respectively. Strong positive correlations existed between volumes of prescribing of each drug class. The drugs prescribed in the greatest volumes were hypnotics. Practice population structure had some influence on psychotropic drug prescribing with high prescribing being associated with the proportions of temporary residents and women aged 65 years and over in the practice for all three classes of drug. Other factors, including presence of a practice counsellor, were not found to have a significant influence on psychotropic drug prescribing. CONCLUSION. The degree of variation in prescribing volumes of psychotropic drugs between practices raises serious concerns. Further study is needed, but progress will be hampered until there is more clarity over the effectiveness and appropriateness of using these substances in the various illness, symptom and life-stress presentations seen in primary care.
机译:背景。尽管人们早已认识到减少催眠药和抗焦虑药处方的必要性,但精神药物处方方式的实践之间的差异却很少受到关注。造成这种变化的因素知之甚少。目标。这项研究旨在描述催眠药,抗焦虑药和抗抑郁药处方中一般做法之间的差异程度。它的目的还在于分析实践人群和全科医师的测量方法以及全科医师特征对处方量变化的影响。方法。收集了1992年4月至1993年3月从剑桥和亨廷顿卫生委员会的所有61种做法中定期收集的处方数据和实践人群数据。处方以每种药物类别的每1000个实践人群的年度定义日剂量来衡量。获得并分析了与执业结构和全科医生特征有关的变量数据。通过多元回归研究潜在的影响变量。结果。在最高和最低的处方实践之间,每1000名针对催眠药,抗焦虑药和抗抑郁药的实践人群的年度定义日剂量分别有11倍,13倍和8倍的差异。每个药物类别的处方量之间存在很强的正相关关系。开出最大剂量的药物是催眠药。实践人群结构对精神药物处方有一定影响,在这三种药物的实践中,高处方与临时居民和65岁及65岁以上妇女的比例有关。没有发现其他因素,包括执业辅导员的存在,对精神药物处方没有重大影响。结论。各种实践之间精神药物处方量的变化程度引起了严重的关注。需要进一步的研究,但是直到对在初级保健中发现的各种疾病,症状和生活压力表现形式中使用这些物质的有效性和适当性有了更清晰的了解之前,进展将受到阻碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号