【24h】

Changing practice with evidence-based aphorisms

机译:循证格言改变惯例

获取原文
           

摘要

The Australian Family Physician (AFP) is the journal of the RCGP's Australian cousin, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners — consider it Neighbours to the BJGP's Eastenders. The AFP has started an interesting series of articles looking at the evidence behind some medical aphorisms. They have examined whether a careful history leads to the diagnosis 80% of the time (perhaps, but half the diagnosis was in the referral letter)1 and whether a doctor who treats him or herself has a fool for a patient (Yes).2 Wouldn't it be interesting to know if there is anything behind all those other sentences we vaguely remember from medical school; if only to justify passing them on proudly to medical students ourselves. After all, they are often the only things we do remember from medical school.
机译:澳大利亚家庭医师(AFP)是RCGP的澳大利亚表亲,即澳大利亚皇家全科医生学院的期刊-认为它是BJGP Eastenders的邻居。法新社已经开始发表一系列有趣的文章,着眼于某些医学警句背后的证据。他们检查了是否有仔细的病史在80%的时间内导致了诊断(也许是诊断的一半是在推荐信中)1,以及治疗他或她自己的医生是否对病人有傻瓜(是).2知道我们在医学院里还记得的所有其他句子后面是否还有什么有趣吗?只是为了证明自己自豪地将它们传递给医学生是合理的。毕竟,它们通常是我们医学院唯一记得的东西。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号