...
首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of psychiatry. >Exploratory and confirmatory factorial structure of the MCMI-III Personality Disorders : Overlapping versus non-overlapping scales
【24h】

Exploratory and confirmatory factorial structure of the MCMI-III Personality Disorders : Overlapping versus non-overlapping scales

机译:探索性和确认性的MCMI-III人格障碍的结构:重叠量表与非重叠量表

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the factorial structure of the 14 Personality Disorder (PD's) scales of the MCMI-III for the overlapping and non-overlapping scales, independently. Previous exploratory studies using different factor extraction procedures inform that the structure of MCMI-III personality disorders has between 2 and 4 factors. Methods: The present study used a large sample of 674 non-clinical subjects divided at random in two groups: a) calibration, and b) validation. In the calibration group, principal component analysis with orthogonal rotation was carried out, obtaining 2, 3 and 4 factors for the overlapping and non-overlapping scales independently. In the validation group, the three models were compared using confirmatory factorial analysis techniques. Results and Conclusions: The exploratory and confirmatory results indicate that the 4-factor solution is the most plausible. Although the congruence coefficients between non-overlapping and overlapping scales in the 4-factor solution were higher, confirmatory factor analysis showed that models designed from overlapping scales did not fit well to data.
机译:背景与目的:这项研究的目的是针对重叠和非重叠量表分别探索MCMI-III的14种人格障碍量表(PD)量表的阶乘结构。以前使用不同因素提取程序进行的探索性研究表明,MCMI-III型人格障碍的结构具有2至4个因素。方法:本研究使用了674个非临床受试者的大样本,将其随机分为两组:a)校准,b)验证。在校准组中,进行正交旋转的主成分分析,分别获得重叠,非重叠标度的2、3和4个因子。在验证组中,使用验证性因子分析技术比较了这三个模型。结果与结论:探索性和证实性结果表明,四因素溶液是最合理的。尽管在4因子解中非重叠量表和重叠量表之间的一致性系数较高,但验证性因子分析表明,由重叠量表设计的模型不太适合数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号