...
首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of general practice. >Reducing the use of out-of-hours primary care services: A survey among Dutch general practitioners
【24h】

Reducing the use of out-of-hours primary care services: A survey among Dutch general practitioners

机译:减少非工作时间的初级保健服务的使用:荷兰全科医生的一项调查

获取原文

摘要

Abstract Background: Out-of-hours primary care services have a high general practitioner (GP) workload with increasing costs, while half of all contacts are non-urgent. Objectives: To identify views of GPs to influence the use of the out-of-hours GP cooperatives. Methods: Cross-sectional survey study among a random sample of 800 GPs in the Netherlands. Results: Of the 428 respondents (53.5% response rate), 86.5% confirmed an increase in their workload and 91.8% felt that the number of patient contacts could be reduced. A total of 75.4% GP respondents reported that the 24-h service society was a ‘very important’ reason why patients with non-urgent problems attended the GP cooperative; the equivalent for worry or anxiety was 65.8%, and for easy accessibility, 60.1%. Many GPs (83.9%) believed that the way telephone triage is currently performed contributes to the high use of GP cooperatives. Measures that GPs believed were both desirable and effective in reducing the use of GP cooperatives included co-payment for patients, stricter triage, and a larger role for the telephone consultation doctor. GPs considered patient education, improved telephone accessibility of daytime general practices, more possibilities for same-day appointments, as well as feedback concerning the use of GP cooperatives to practices and triage nurses also desirable, but less effective. Conclusion: This study provides several clues for influencing the use of GP cooperatives. Further research is needed to examine the impact and safety of these strategies. Key Messages GPs believe that the number of patient contacts with the GP cooperative could be reduced. Strategies to reduce the use of GP cooperatives perceived as both effective and advisable by GPs are introducing co-payment for patients, stricter triage and a larger role for the telephone consultation doctor.
机译:摘要背景:营业时间以外的初级保健服务具有较高的全科医生(GP)工作量,且成本不断增加,而所有联络人中有一半是非紧急的。目标:确定全科医生的意见,以影响非工作时间全科医生合作社的使用。方法:在荷兰随机抽取800个GP进行横断面调查研究。结果:在428名受访者中(53.5%的回应率),有86.5%的人确认工作量增加,而91.8%的人认为可以减少患者的接触人数。总共75.4%的GP受访者表示,24小时服务社会是非紧急患者参加GP合作社的“非常重要”的原因。担心或焦虑的当量为65.8%,易于访问的比率为60.1%。许多全科医生(83.9%)认为,当前进行电话分类的方式有助于全科医生合作社的大量使用。全科医生认为在减少全科医生合作社使用方面既可取又有效的措施包括:患者共付,更严格的分诊和电话咨询医生的更大作用。全科医生认为患者教育,日间常规执业的电话可及性得到改善,当日预约的可能性更大以及关于将全科医生合作社用于执业和分诊护士的反馈也很可取,但效果较差。结论:本研究为影响GP合作社的使用提供了一些线索。需要进一步研究以检查这些策略的影响和安全性。重要信息全科医生认为与全科医生合作的患者数量可以减少。减少使用全科医生认为有效和可取的全科医生合作社的策略是引入患者自付费用,更严格的分诊和电话咨询医生的更大作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号