首页> 外文期刊>The Angle orthodontist. >Types of tooth movement, bodily or tipping, do not affect the displacement of the tooth's center of resistance but do affect the alveolar bone resorption
【24h】

Types of tooth movement, bodily or tipping, do not affect the displacement of the tooth's center of resistance but do affect the alveolar bone resorption

机译:牙齿移动的类型(身体移动或倾斜)不会影响牙齿阻力中心的位移,但会影响牙槽骨的吸收

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To investigate how types of tooth movement, bodily or tipping, influence the displacement of the center of resistance in teeth and alveolar bone resorption. Materials and Methods: Ten-week-old female Wistar rats were divided into eight groups of different factors, as follows: type of movement (bodily and tipping) and force magnitude (10, 25, 50, and 100 cN). The maxillary left first molars were moved mesially with nickel-titanium coil springs for 28 days. Micro–computed tomography (micro-CT) images were taken before and after tooth movement. The position of the center of resistance was determined by using finite element models constructed from the micro-CT image. The displacement of the center of resistance and the volume of alveolar bone resorption were measured. Results: The displacement of the center of resistance showed no significant difference between the bodily and tipping groups. The displacements of the center of resistance were increased with force magnitude at 10 and 25 cN, whereas they were not further increased at 50 and 100 cN. On the other hand, cervical alveolar bone resorption was significantly greater in the tipping group than in the bodily group. Conclusions: Displacement of the center of resistance was not influenced by the types of tooth movement. However, volume of cervical alveolar bone resorption was greater in the tipping movement group than in the bodily movement group.
机译:目的:研究牙齿运动的类型(身体或倾斜)如何影响牙齿中阻力中心的位移和牙槽骨吸收。材料和方法:将十周大的Wistar雌性大鼠分为八组,这些因子包括:运动类型(身体和倾覆)和力量大小(10、25、50和100 cN)。左上颌第一磨牙与镍钛螺旋弹簧近距离移动28天。在牙齿移动之前和之后都拍摄了微型计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)图像。电阻中心的位置是通过使用由微CT图像构建的有限元模型确定的。测量阻力中心的位移和牙槽骨吸收的体积。结果:身体和小费组的阻力中心位移无明显差异。阻力中心的位移随着力大小在10和25 cN时增加,而在50和100 cN时没有进一步增加。另一方面,小费组的宫颈牙槽骨吸收明显高于身体组。结论:阻力中心的位移不受牙齿运动类型的影响。但是,翻倒运动组的颈部牙槽骨吸收量大于身体运动组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号