首页> 外文期刊>The bone & joint journal. >The effects of various physical non-operative modalities on the pain in osteoarthritis of the knee
【24h】

The effects of various physical non-operative modalities on the pain in osteoarthritis of the knee

机译:各种非手术方式对膝盖骨关节炎疼痛的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate theeffect of various non-operative modalities of treatment (transcutaneouselectrical nerve stimulation (TENS); neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES); insoles and bracing) on the pain of osteoarthritis (OA)of the knee. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred ReportingItems for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identifythe therapeutic options which are commonly adopted for the managementof osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.The outcome measurement tools used in the different studies werethe visual analogue scale and The Western Ontario and McMaster UniversitiesArthritis Index pain index: all pain scores were converted to a100-point scale. A total of 30 studies met our inclusion criteria: 13 on insoles,seven on TENS, six on NMES, and four on bracing. The standardisedmean difference (SMD) in pain after treatment with TENS was 1.796,which represented a significant reduction in pain. The significantoverall effect estimate for NMES on pain was similar to that ofTENS, with a SMD of 1.924. The overall effect estimate of insoleson pain was a SMD of 0.992. The overall effect of bracing showeda significant reduction in pain of 1.34. Overall, all four non-operative modalities of treatment werefound to have a significant effect on the reduction of pain in OAof the knee. This study shows that non-operative physical modalities of treatmentare of benefit when treating OA of the knee. However, much of theliterature reviewed evaluates studies with follow-up of less thansix months: future work should aim to evaluate patients with longerfollow-up.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(1Suppl A):89–94.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估各种非手术治疗方式(经皮神经电刺激(TENS);神经肌肉电刺激(NMES);鞋垫和支撑)对膝骨关节炎(OA)疼痛的影响。我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析的``首选报告项目''进行了系统评价,以确定通常用于治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)的治疗选择。不同研究中使用的结果测量工具是视觉模拟量表以及西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学的关节炎指数疼痛指数:所有疼痛评分均转换为100分制。共有30项研究符合我们的纳入标准:鞋垫13项,TENS项7项,NMES项6项,支撑部4项。用TENS治疗后疼痛的标准平均差异(SMD)为1.796,表示疼痛明显减轻。 NMES对疼痛的总体显着估计与TENS相似,其SMD为1.924。 Insoleson疼痛的总体效果估计为SMD为0.992。支撑的总体效果显示疼痛明显减轻了1.34。总体而言,发现所有四种非手术治疗方式均对减轻膝骨OA疼痛具有显著作用。这项研究表明,非手术性物理治疗方法在治疗膝关节炎时是有益的。然而,许多文献综述都对随访时间少于六个月的研究进行了评估:未来的工作应旨在评估随访时间更长的患者。本文引用:Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B(1Suppl A):89–94。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号