首页> 外文期刊>The Angle orthodontist. >A comparison of resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets under an increasing applied moment
【24h】

A comparison of resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets under an increasing applied moment

机译:在施加的力矩增加时,自锁托槽的滑动阻力比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To test the null hypotheses that at clinically relevant amounts of applied moment, there are no differences in the amount of resistance to sliding (RS) between self-ligating (SL) and conventionally ligated (CL) brackets on both stainless steel (SS) and nickel-titanium (NT) archwire. Materials and Methods: Three different SL brackets and one CL bracket, all 0.022″ slot, were tested on a custom-built device to simulate canine retraction mechanics in the second-order dimension. The setup allowed for simultaneous and continuous measurement of RS and applied moment at the bracket-archwire interface. The brackets tested were Damon3, In-Ovation R, Smartclip, and Victory, all of which were tested with 0.019″ × 0.025″ SS and NT archwires. The RS at calculated moments of 2000?g-mm and 4000?g-mm was determined and compared between the various brackets and both archwire types. Descriptive measures, analysis of variance, and Tukey-Kramer post-test comparisons were used to calculate results. Results: All brackets displayed a greater amount of RS with NT than with SS archwires. At the higher moment levels (4000?g-mm), no significant reduction in RS was found between CL and SL brackets on both SS and NT archwires. At lower levels of applied moment (2000?g-mm), reductions in RS of 18% (42.7?g) and 18% (38.5?g) were found between the CL bracket and the best performing SL bracket on NT and SS, respectively. Conclusion: At low values of applied moment, some statistical differences were found; however, in general, the differences in RS amongst the various SL and CL brackets tested may not be clinically relevant.
机译:目的:检验原假设,即在临床相关的施加力矩量下,两个不锈钢(SS)上的自结扎(SL)支架和常规结扎(CL)支架之间的抗滑移(RS)量没有差异)和镍钛(NT)弓丝。材料和方法:在定制设备上测试了三个不同的SL支架和一个CL支架,全部为0.022“插槽,以模拟二维尺寸的犬只回缩力学。该设置允许在支架-弓线界面上同时连续测量RS和施加的力矩。测试的支架为Damon3,In-Ovation R,Smartclip和Victory,所有这些支架均使用0.019“×0.025” SS和NT弓丝进行了测试。确定了在计算的2000?g-mm和4000?g-mm的力矩下的RS,并比较了各种托槽和两种弓丝类型。描述性测量,方差分析和Tukey-Kramer测试后比较用于计算结果。结果:与SS弓丝相比,与NT相比,所有支架对RS的RS含量均更高。在较高的力矩水平(4000?g-mm)下,在SS和NT弓线上的CL和SL支架之间未发现RS的明显降低。在较低的施加力矩水平(2000?g-mm)下,在NT和SS的CL支架和性能最佳的SL支架之间,RS降低了18%(42.7µg)和18%(38.5µg)。分别。结论:在较低的施加力矩值下,发现一些统计学差异;但是,通常,所测试的各种SL和CL括号之间的RS差异可能在临床上不相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号