首页> 外文期刊>Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Facultad de Medicina. Revista >Revisi?3n sistem??tica de estudios de costo-efectividad del test de portadores para fibrosis qu?-stica
【24h】

Revisi?3n sistem??tica de estudios de costo-efectividad del test de portadores para fibrosis qu?-stica

机译:系统评价囊性纤维化携带者检测的成本效益研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Cystic fibrosis is considered the most common autosomal disease with multisystem complications in non-Hispanic white population. Objective: To review the available evidence on cost-effectiveness of the cystic fibrosis carrier testing compared to no intervention. Materials and methods: The databases of MEDLINE, Embase, NHS, EBM Reviews - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, LILACS, Health Technology Assessment, Genetests.org, Genetsickkids.org and Web of Science were used to conduct a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of performing the genetic test in cystic fibrosis patients. Cost-effectiveness studies were included without language or date of publication restrictions. Results: Only 13 studies were relevant for full review. Prenatal, preconception and mixed screening strategies were found. Health perspective was the most used; the discount rate applied was heterogeneous between 3.5% and 5%; the main analysis unit was the cost per detected carrier couple, followed by cost per averted birth with cystic fibrosis. It was evident that the most cost- effective strategy was preconception screening associated with prenatal test. Conclusions: A marked heterogeneity in the methodology was found, which led to incomparable results and to conclude that there are different approaches to this genetic test.
机译:简介:在非西班牙裔白人人群中,囊性纤维化被认为是最常见的常染色体疾病,具有多系统并发症。目的:回顾与无干预相比,囊性纤维化携带者检测的成本效益的现有证据。材料和方法:使用MEDLINE,Embase,NHS,EBM评论数据库-Cochrane系统评价数据库,LILACS,卫生技术评估,Genetests.org,Genetsickkids.org和Web of Science进行了成本-费用的系统评价。在囊性纤维化患者中进行基因检测的有效性。包括成本效益研究,没有语言或出版日期的限制。结果:只有13项研究与全面审查相关。发现了产前,孕前和混合筛查策略。健康观点是最常用的。所采用的折现率在3.5%至5%之间;主要分析单位是每个检测到的携带者夫妇的费用,其次是每个因囊性纤维化而避免的分娩费用。显然,最具成本效益的策略是与产前检查相关的孕前筛查。结论:发现该方法存在明显的异质性,这导致无法比拟的结果,并得出结论,该基因测试有不同的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号