...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatry Investigation >Simultaneous Comparison of Efficacy and Tolerability of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Mixed-Treatment Comparison Analysis Based on Head-to-Head Trial Data
【24h】

Simultaneous Comparison of Efficacy and Tolerability of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Mixed-Treatment Comparison Analysis Based on Head-to-Head Trial Data

机译:精神分裂症第二代抗精神病药疗效和耐受性的同时比较:基于头对头试验数据的混合治疗比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective Second-generation antipsychotics have been repeatedly shown to be superior to placebo. However, the comparative efficacy among these drugs has not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we used Mixed Treatment Comparison (MTC) procedures to elucidate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of second-generation antipsychotics. Methods Seven antipsychotics were selected based on the availability of the relevant data. Data were gathered from a series of review article published by the Cochrane Collaboration. Six outcome measures were analyzed: 1) percentage of no clinically important response as defined by the original authors, 2) PANSS total score change from baseline to endpoint, 3) percentage of akathisia, 4) percentage of antiparkinson medication use, 5) percentage of total body weight increase more than 7%, and 6) percentage of drop-out due to any reasons. Results All the second-generation antipsychotics included in this study showed fairly similar efficacy but widely different tolerability. In terms of efficacy, amisulpride, clozapine and olanzapine were ranked higher than aripiprazole, quetiapine and ziprasidone. Clozapine and olanzapine were superior in terms of akathisia and extrapyramidal symptom risk, but, far more prone to induce clinically important weight gain. Conclusion Using MTC methodology, we could line up the second generation antipsychotics according to their hierarchical superiority in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Though the wide overlap among the confidence intervals and the inconsistency between the direct and indirect comparison results may limit the validity of these results, it may still allow the important insights into the relative merits of the available drugs.
机译:目的第二代抗精神病药已多次被证明优于安慰剂。但是,尚未系统评估这些药物之间的相对疗效。在这项研究中,我们使用混合治疗比较(MTC)程序来阐明第二代抗精神病药的比较疗效和耐受性。方法根据相关资料的可用性,选择7种抗精神病药。数据来自Cochrane协作组织发表的一系列评论文章。分析了六个结果指标:1)原始作者定义的无临床重要反应的百分比; 2)从基线到终点的PANSS总得分变化; 3)静坐症的百分比; 4)抗帕金森药物使用的百分比; 5)总体重增加了7%以上,并且6)由于任何原因而辍学的百分比。结果本研究中包括的所有第二代抗精神病药均显示出相当相似的疗效,但耐受性差异很大。就功效而言,氨磺必利,氯氮平和奥氮平的排名高于阿立哌唑,喹硫平和齐拉西酮。氯氮平和奥氮平在静坐无力和锥体外系症状风险方面均较优,但更容易诱发临床上重要的体重增加。结论使用MTC方法学,我们可以根据第二代抗精神病药在疗效和耐受性方面的优越性来排列它们。尽管置信区间之间的广泛重叠以及直接比较结果和间接比较结果之间的不一致可能会限制这些结果的有效性,但仍可能使人们对现有药物的相对价值具有重要的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号