...
首页> 外文期刊>Public Health Research >Does Variation in Malaria Vector Collection Methods Significantly Affect Entomologic Inoculation Rates?
【24h】

Does Variation in Malaria Vector Collection Methods Significantly Affect Entomologic Inoculation Rates?

机译:疟疾媒介收集方法的变化是否会显着影响昆虫学接种率?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Entomologic Inoculation Rate (EIR), the product of vector biting rate and the sporozoites rate or the proportion of mosquitoes with sporozoites in the salivary glands has been strongly correlated with malaria prevalence. This study was undertaken to determine whether mosquito collection method significantly affected EIR estimates. Method: Study was conducted in 7 local Government Areas (LGAs) of Bayelsa State, across 3 eco-vegetational zones (fresh water forest, brackish water swamp forest, mangrove coastal water forest). Three methods were used for mosquito collections: Pyrethrum Spray Catch (SPC), Human Bait Catch (HBC) (Indoor), Human Bait Catch (Outdoor). EIR was calculated as per standard method. Results: EIR means obtained by PSC and HBC (Outdoor) methods were not significantly different (F=4.989; df=2; p<0.05), but significant differences were obtained between PSC and HBC (Indoor) estimates. These differences were also significantly influenced by eco-vegetational zones (F=3.92; df=2’ p<0.05). Conclusions: It is advisable to compare EIRs obtained by the same mosquito collection methods as indices of malaria prevalence.
机译:背景:唾液腺中的昆虫学接种率(EIR),媒介咬入率与子孢子率的乘积或蚊子与子孢子的比例与疟疾患病率密切相关。进行这项研究以确定蚊子收集方法是否显着影响了EIR估计。方法:在巴耶尔萨州的7个地方政府区域(LGAs)进行了研究,横跨3个生态植被区(淡水森林,微咸水沼泽森林,红树林沿海水森林)。三种收集蚊子的方法:除虫菊喷雾剂(SPC),人饵(HBC)(室内),人饵(室外)。 EIR按照标准方法计算。结果:通过PSC和HBC(室外)方法获得的EIR平均值无显着差异(F = 4.989; df = 2; p <0.05),但PSC和HBC(室内)估计值之间存在显着差异。这些差异也受到生态植被区的显着影响(F = 3.92; df = 2'p <0.05)。结论:建议将通过相同蚊子收集方法获得的EIR与疟疾流行指数进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号