...
首页> 外文期刊>Sports >Validity and Reliability of Kinematics Measured with PUSH Band vs. Linear Encoder in Bench Press and Push-Ups
【24h】

Validity and Reliability of Kinematics Measured with PUSH Band vs. Linear Encoder in Bench Press and Push-Ups

机译:在俯卧撑和俯卧撑中使用PUSH频段与线性编码器测量的运动学的有效性和可靠性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the validity and reliability of a PUSH band device with a linear encoder to measure movement velocity with different loads during the push-up and bench press exercises. Methods: Twenty resistance-trained athletes performed push-up and bench press exercises with four different loads: without weight vest, 10-20-30 kg weight vest, bench press: 50–82% of their assumed 1 repetition maximum (1 RM) in steps of 10 kg. A linear encoder (Musclelab) and the PUSH band measured mean and peak velocity during both exercises. Several statistical analyses were used to investigate the validity and reliability of the PUSH band with the linear encoder. Results: The main findings of this study demonstrated only moderate associations between the PUSH band and linear encoder for mean velocity (r = 0.62, 0.70) and peak velocity (r = 0.46, 0.49) for both exercises. Furthermore, a good level of agreement (peak velocity: ICC = 0.60, 0.64; mean velocity: ICC = 0.77, 0.78) was observed between the two measurement devices. However, a significant bias was found with lower velocity values measured with the PUSH band in both exercises. In the push-up, both the linear encoder and PUSH band were deemed very reliable (ICC 0.98; the coefficient of variation (CV): 5.9–7.3%). Bench press reliability decreased for the PUSH band (ICC 0.95), and the coefficient of variance increased to (12.8–13.3%) for the velocity measures. Calculated 1 RM with the two devices was the same for the push-up, while in bench press the PUSH band under-estimated the 1 RM by 14 kg compared to the linear encoder. Conclusions: It was concluded that the PUSH band will show decreased reliability from velocity measures in a bench press exercise and underestimate load-velocity based 1 RM predictions. For training, the PUSH band can be used during push-ups, however caution is suggested when using the device for the purposes of feedback in bench press at increasing loads.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是比较带有线性编码器的推式推举器械在推举和卧推练习中在不同载荷下测量运动速度的有效性和可靠性。方法:二十名接受过阻力训练的运动员在四种不同的负荷下进行俯卧撑和卧推锻炼:无负重背心,10-20-30 kg负重背心,卧推:假定最大重复次数(1 RM)的50-82%以10公斤为单位。两次练习期间,线性编码器(Musclelab)和PUSH频段均测量了平均速度和峰值速度。几种统计分析被用来调查线性编码器推入频段的有效性和可靠性。结果:这项研究的主要结果表明,在两种练习中,PUSH频段和线性编码器之间的平均速度(r = 0.62,0.70)和峰值速度(r = 0.46,0.49)仅存在中等关联。此外,在两个测量设备之间观察到良好的一致性水平(峰值速度:ICC = 0.60,0.64;平均速度:ICC = 0.77,0.78)。但是,在两个练习中都发现使用PUSH频段测得的较低速度值存在明显偏差。在俯卧撑中,线性编码器和PUSH频段都被认为非常可靠(ICC> 0.98;变异系数(CV):5.9–7.3%)。对于PUSH频段,台式压力机的可靠性下降(ICC <0.95),而速度测量的方差系数增加到(12.8-13.3%)。用两个设备计算出的1 RM对于俯卧撑是相同的,而在卧推中,PUSH频段与线性编码器相比低估了1 RM 14 kg。结论:结论是在卧推练习中,推力带的速度测量显示出可靠性降低,并且基于1 RM的预测低估了载荷速度。为了进行训练,可以在俯卧撑期间使用PUSH乐队,但是在使用该设备时,出于增加负荷的卧推中的反馈目的,建议谨慎使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号