首页> 外文期刊>Practical Laboratory Medicine >Analytical performance evaluation of the Elecsys? Cyclosporine and Elecsys? Tacrolimus assays on the cobas e411 analyzer
【24h】

Analytical performance evaluation of the Elecsys? Cyclosporine and Elecsys? Tacrolimus assays on the cobas e411 analyzer

机译:Elecsys的分析性能评估?环孢霉素和Elecsys?在cobas e411分析仪上进行他克莫司测定

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (TAC) are immunosuppressant drugs that are often used to treat autoimmune diseases and as transplantation therapy; therefore, their concentrations need to be monitored carefully. We herein evaluated the analytical performance of the Elecsys? Cyclosporine and Elecsys? Tacrolimus assay kits, which have been newly developed to measure CsA and TAC concentrations in the whole blood. Methods We used residual whole blood samples from autoimmune disease and transplantation patients who were being treated with CsA or TAC. CsA concentrations were measured using an affinity chrome-mediated immunoassay (ACMIA) and an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). TAC concentrations were measured using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and ECLIA. We investigated assay precision, linearity, lower limit of quantitation (LOQ), stability of calibration, influence of interference substances and the hematocrit, correlation of ACMIA with ECLIA, and correlation of CLIA with ECLIA. Results Within-assay coefficients of variation were 1.8?3.6% (CsA: 94?1238 ng/mL) and 2.9?3.9% (TAC: 2.1?17.8 ng/mL), whereas day-to-day coefficients of variation ranged between 3.0?4.1% (CsA) and 2.8?3.9% (TAC). The limits of quantitation were defined as the concentration at which the CV was approximately 10%. Each lower LOQ obtained was 16 ng/mL (CsA), and 0.95 ng/mL (TAC). CsA and TAC calibrations were stable for at least 21 days. Neither the presence of conjugated bilirubin, unconjugated bilirubin, chyle, and rheumatoid factor nor the hematocrit affected these assays. A method comparison using a standardized major axis regression analysis of ACMIA and ECLIA was r=0.995, y=0.924x ?1.175, n=200 (CsA), while that of CLIA and ECLIA was r=0.994, y=1.080x ?0.197, n=200 (TAC). Conclusions The analytical performances of the Elecsys? Cyclosporine and Elecsys?Tacrolimus assays were acceptable. Furthermore, CyA and TAC concentrations may be simultaneously measured using a single pretreatment which is of benefit if patients have to undertake conversion between these two drugs. Additionally, it benefits the workflow in the clinical laboratory. Thus, the Elecsys? Cyclosporine and Elecsys? Tacrolimus assays may be suitable for routine therapeutic drug monitoring.
机译:背景技术环孢素(CsA)和他克莫司(TAC)是免疫抑制剂,通常用于治疗自身免疫性疾病和作为移植疗法。因此,需要仔细监测其浓度。我们在这里评估了Elecsys?的分析性能。环孢霉素和Elecsys?他克莫司测定试剂盒,这是新开发的用于测量全血中CsA和TAC浓度的试剂盒。方法我们使用了接受CsA或TAC治疗的自身免疫性疾病和移植患者的残留全血样本。使用亲和力铬介导的免疫测定(ACMIA)和电化学发光免疫测定(ECLIA)测量CsA浓度。使用化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)和ECLIA测量TAC浓度。我们调查了测定精度,线性,定量下限(LOQ),校准的稳定性,干扰物质和血细胞比容的影响,ACMIA与ECLIA的相关性以及CLIA与ECLIA的相关性。结果测定内变异系数为1.8?3.6%(CsA:94?1238 ng / mL)和2.9?3.9%(TAC:2.1?17.8 ng / mL),而日常变异系数为3.0 4.14.1%(CsA)和2.8?3.9%(TAC)。定量限定义为CV约为10%的浓度。获得的每个较低的LOQ为16 ng / mL(CsA)和0.95 ng / mL(TAC)。 CsA和TAC校准稳定至少21天。结合胆红素,未结合胆红素,乳糜和类风湿因子的存在以及血细胞比容均不影响这些测定。使用ACMIA和ECLIA的标准主轴回归分析进行的方法比较为r = 0.995,y = 0.924x?1.175,n = 200(CsA),而CLIA和ECLIA的方法比较为r = 0.994,y = 1.080x?0.197 ,n = 200(TAC)。结论Elecsys?的分析性能?环孢菌素和Elecsys®他克莫司的测定是可以接受的。此外,可以使用单一预处理同时测量CyA和TAC浓度,如果患者必须在这两种药物之间进行转换,这将是有益的。此外,它有益于临床实验室的工作流程。因此,Elecsys?环孢霉素和Elecsys?他克莫司测定可能适用于常规治疗药物监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号