...
首页> 外文期刊>Producao Online >Emprego de métodos de apoio multicritério à decis?o para sele??o de uma escola de idiomas
【24h】

Emprego de métodos de apoio multicritério à decis?o para sele??o de uma escola de idiomas

机译:多标准决策支持方法在语言学校的印章中的使用

获取原文
           

摘要

Nowadays, the interest of organizations by professionals who have deep knowledge concerning more than one language has been increasing. In this scenario, the choice of a language school has been one of the most common decision problems, which has been often made on the basis of word-of-mouth, marketing activities of schools and trials without criteria. In order to contribute to this problem, this paper presents a study in which two multi-criteria decision aid methods (AHP and Weighted Average) were used to select a language school. Thus, the degree of importance of criteria relating to the problem and the degree of satisfaction of undergraduate and postgraduate students in relation to language schools they study were taken into account. The best ranked language school was the same for both MCDA methods, although some schools have obtained different positions. It was found that the analysis with AHP is richer and more elaborate than with the Weighted Average method. However, the large number of pairwise comparisons which were required to the study demanded significant attention and cognitive effort from the decision maker, and more time to perform the analysis - aspects that may contribute to the preference for the Weighted Average method in similar studies.
机译:如今,对一种以上语言有深入了解的专业人士对组织的兴趣正在增加。在这种情况下,选择语言学校一直是最常见的决策问题之一,这通常是根据口碑,学校的营销活动和没有标准的审判做出的。为了解决这个问题,本文提出了一项研究,其中使用两种多标准决策辅助方法(AHP和加权平均)来选择语言学校。因此,考虑了与该问题相关的标准的重要性程度以及与他们所学习的语言学校相关的本科生和研究生的满意程度。两种MCDA方法中排名最高的语言学校都是相同的,尽管有些学校获得了不同的职位。结果发现,与加权平均法相比,使用AHP进行的分析更丰富,更详尽。但是,这项研究需要大量的成对比较,需要决策者给予大量的关注和认知,并且需要更多的时间来进行分析-这些方面可能会导致类似研究偏爱加权平均法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号