【24h】

DESIGN ASPECTS OF BLOCK REVETMENTS

机译:整体设计的设计方面

获取原文
       

摘要

The increasing shortage and costs of natural materials in certain geographical areas has resulted in recent years, inter alia, in the rapid development of artificial (concrete) block revetments. In general, two main types of revetments can be distinguished: permeable (stone pitching, placed relatively open block-mats) and (relatively-) impermeable (closed blocks, concrete slabs). Regarding the shape and/or placing technique a distinction can be made between: a) free (mostly rectangular-) blocks and b) interlocking blocks of different design (tongue-and-groove connection, ship- lap, cabling, blocks connected to geotextile by pins etc.). In all these cases the type of sublayer (permeable/impermeable) and the grade of permeability of the toplayer are very important factors in the stability of these revetments. The design also needs to be made (executed) and maintained. Both aspects must therefore already be taken along within the stadium of designing. At the moment there is a large variety of types of revetment-blocks and other defence systems (i.e. block-mats), see Fig. 1. Until recently no objective design-criteria were available for most types/systems of blocks. The choice (type and size) of the revetments built sofar is only based on experience and on personal points of view, sometimes supported by small-scale model investigations. In the light of new (stricter) rules regarding the safety of the Dutch dikes, as they have been drawn up by the Delta-Commission, the need for proper design-criteria for the revetments of dikes has evidently grown. Because of the complexity of the problem no simply, generally valid mathematical model for the stability of the revetment are available yet. For restricted areas of application however, fairly reliable criteria (often supported by large-scale tests) have been developed in the Netherlands not only for the kind of revetment, but also for conditions of loads. This new approach is discussed in (Klein Breteler, 1988). This paper presents a short state-of-the-art review of existing knowledge on the designing of different types of revetments and, where ever possible, the available stability criteria are mentioned. There is also given some comparison of the different types of revetments with their advantages and disadvantages and suggestions regarding their practical application.
机译:近年来,在某些地理区域,天然材料的短缺和成本日益增加,尤其导致了人工(混凝土)砌块护岸的快速发展。通常,可以区分两种主要类型的护岸:可渗透的(石块沥青,放置相对开放的砌块垫)和(相对)不可渗透的(封闭砌块,混凝土板)。关于形状和/或放置技术,可以在以下方面进行区分:a)自由(主要是矩形)砖和b)不同设计的互锁砖(榫槽连接,搭接,电缆,连接到土工布的砖)通过大头针等)。在所有这些情况下,底层的类型(可渗透/不可渗透)和渗透层的渗透等级是这些护岸稳定性的重要因素。还需要进行设计(执行)和维护。因此,必须在设计领域内同时考虑这两个方面。目前,护岸砌块和其他防御系统(即砌块垫)种类繁多,请参见图1。直到最近,大多数类型/系统的砌块都没有客观的设计准则。护岸建造的沙发的选择(类型和尺寸)仅基于经验和个人观点,有时会受到小型模型研究的支持。鉴于三角洲委员会制定的关于荷兰堤防安全性的新(更严格)规则,显然,对于堤防护坡的适当设计标准的需求明显增加了。由于问题的复杂性,目前尚无简单,有效的护岸稳定性数学模型可用。但是,对于有限的应用领域,荷兰不仅针对护岸的类型,还针对载荷的条件,已经制定了相当可靠的标准(通常由大型测试支持)。 (Klein Breteler,1988)中讨论了这种新方法。本文简要介绍了有关设计不同类型护岸的现有知识的最新技术水平,并在可能的地方提及了可用的稳定性标准。还对不同类型的护岸的优缺点进行了比较,并就其实际应用提出了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号