首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare >Review on Neonatal End-of-Life Decision-Making: Medical Authority or Parental Autonomy?:
【24h】

Review on Neonatal End-of-Life Decision-Making: Medical Authority or Parental Autonomy?:

机译:新生儿生命终结决策的回顾:医学权威还是父母自治?:

获取原文
           

摘要

As advances in medical technology are constantly re-defining the lower limit of newborn viability, the practice of withholding/withdrawing treatment in neonatal care is increasingly prevalent. Now more than ever, physicians working in neonatal intensive care units have to constantly face the ethical dilemma of terminating the neonates' life support, sometimes against the parents' desire. Traditionally and legally, parents have the duty to make decisions on behalf of their infants because they are the ones to whom the consequences matter the most. Physicians, on the other hand, often claim for themselves the role of the child's advocate, with the growing acceptance of the patient's “best interest” standard as the guiding principle. In this mini literature review, the authors examined the issue of medical authority versus parental autonomy in neonatal end-of-life (EoL) decision-making and found that consultations with parents were made in the majority (79–100%) of cases. Furthermore, conflicts between docto...
机译:随着医疗技术的进步不断重新定义新生儿生存能力的下限,在新生儿护理中停止/退出治疗的做法越来越普遍。现在,在新生儿重症监护病房工作的医生比以往任何时候都必须不断面临终止新生儿生命支持的道德困境,有时违背父母的意愿。在传统上和法律上,父母有责任代表他们的婴儿做出决定,因为后果是最重要的。另一方面,随着越来越多地接受患者的“最大利益”标准作为指导原则,内科医生常常自称是儿童倡导者。在这份小型文献综述中,作者检查了新生儿临终(EoL)决策中的医疗权限与父母自主权的问题,并发现在大多数情况下(79-100%)与父母进行了协商。此外,文档之间的冲突...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号