首页> 外文期刊>Preventing chronic disease >Comparing 2 National Organization-Level Workplace Health Promotion and Improvement Tools, 2013–2015
【24h】

Comparing 2 National Organization-Level Workplace Health Promotion and Improvement Tools, 2013–2015

机译:比较2013-2015年两个国家组织级工作场所健康促进和改善工具

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Creating healthy workplaces is becoming more common. Half of employers that have more than 50 employees offer some type of workplace health promotion program. Few employers implement comprehensive evidence-based interventions that reach all employees and achieve desired health and cost outcomes. A few organization-level assessment and benchmarking tools have emerged to help employers evaluate the comprehensiveness and rigor of their health promotion offerings. Even fewer tools exist that combine assessment with technical assistance and guidance to implement evidence-based practices. Our descriptive analysis compares 2 such tools, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Worksite Health ScoreCard and Prevention Partners’ WorkHealthy America, and presents data from both to describe workplace health promotion practices across the United States. These tools are reaching employers of all types (N = 1,797), and many employers are using a comprehensive approach (85% of those using WorkHealthy America and 45% of those using the ScoreCard), increasing program effectiveness and impact.
机译:创建健康的工作场所变得越来越普遍。拥有超过50名员工的一半雇主提供某种类型的工作场所健康促进计划。很少有雇主会采取全面的基于证据的干预措施,将其覆盖到所有员工并取得理想的健康和成本结果。已经出现了一些组织级别的评估和基准测试工具,以帮助雇主评估其健康促进产品的全面性和严格性。将评估与技术援助和指导相结合以实施循证实践的工具越来越少。我们的描述性分析比较了疾病预防控制中心的工作场所健康计分卡和预防合作伙伴的美国工作健康局这两种工具,并提供了这两种工具的数据来描述全美国的工作场所健康促进做法。这些工具正在普及到所有类型的雇主(N = 1,797),并且许多雇主正在采用综合方法(使用WorkHealthy America的雇主占85%,使用记分卡的雇员占45%),从而提高了计划的有效性和影响力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号