...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventing chronic disease >Costs and Savings Associated With Community Water Fluoridation Programs in Colorado
【24h】

Costs and Savings Associated With Community Water Fluoridation Programs in Colorado

机译:与科罗拉多州社区水氟化计划相关的成本和节省

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Local, state, and national health policy makers require information on the economic burden of oral disease and the cost-effectiveness of oral health programs to set policies and allocate resources. In this study, we estimate the cost savings associated with community water fluoridation programs (CWFPs) in Colorado and potential cost savings if Colorado communities without fluoridation programs or naturally high fluoride levels were to implement CWFPs.   Methods We developed an economic model to compare the costs associated with CWFPs with treatment savings achieved through averted tooth decay. Treatment savings included those associated with direct medical costs and indirect nonmedical costs (i.e., patient time spent on dental visit). We estimated program costs and treatment savings for each water system in Colorado in 2003 dollars. We obtained parameter estimates from published studies, national surveys, and other sources. We calculated net costs for Colorado water systems with existing CWFPs and potential net costs for systems without CWFPs. The analysis includes data for 172 public water systems in Colorado that serve populations of 1000 individuals or more. We used second-order Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the inherent uncertainty of the model assumptions on the results and report the 95% credible range from the simulation model. Results We estimated that Colorado CWFPs were associated with annual savings of $148.9 million (credible range, $115.1 million to $187.2 million) in 2003, or an average of $60.78 per person (credible range, $46.97 to $76.41). We estimated that Colorado would save an additional $46.6 million (credible range, $36.0 to $58.6 million) annually if CWFPs were implemented in the 52 water systems without such programs and for which fluoridation is recommended. Conclusion Colorado realizes significant annual savings from CWFPs; additional savings and reductions in morbidity could be achieved if fluoridation programs were implemented in other areas.
机译:简介当地,州和国家卫生政策制定者需要有关口腔疾病的经济负担以及口腔卫生计划的成本效益的信息,以制定政策和分配资源。在这项研究中,我们估计在科罗拉多州与社区水氟化计划(CWFPs)相关的成本节省,以及如果没有氟化计划或自然氟化物水平较高的科罗拉多州社区实施CWFP则可能节省的成本。方法我们开发了一种经济模型,将CWFP的相关成本与通过避免蛀牙而节省的治疗费用进行了比较。节省的治疗费用包括与直接医疗费用和间接非医疗费用相关的费用(即,患者在牙科护理上花费的时间)。我们以2003年的美元价值估算了科罗拉多州每个供水系统的计划成本和处理节省。我们从已发表的研究,国家调查和其他来源获得了参数估计值。我们计算了使用现有CWFP的科罗拉多州供水系统的净成本,以及不使用CWFP的系统的潜在净成本。分析包括科罗拉多州172个公共供水系统的数据,这些系统服务于1000个人或以上的人口。我们使用二阶蒙特卡洛模拟来评估模型假设在结果上的固有不确定性,并从模拟模型报告95%的可信范围。结果我们估计,2003年科罗拉多州的CWFP每年可节省1.489亿美元(可靠范围,1.151亿美元至1.872亿美元),或每人平均节省60.78美元(可靠范围,46.97美元至76.41美元)。我们估计,如果在52个供水系统中实施CWFPs而不采用此类计划,并且建议使用氟化方法,科罗拉多州每年将另外节省4660万美元(可信范围,36.0美元至5860万美元)。结论科罗拉多州从CWFP中获得了可观的年度节省。如果在其他地区实施氟化计划,则可以进一步节省和减少发病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号