The "Research Jury Method": The Application of the Jury Trial Model to Evaluating the Validity of Descriptive and Causal Statements about Psychotherapy Process and Outcome

Arthur C. Bohart; Gayle C. Byock; Karen L. Tallman; Thomas Mackrill

首页> 外文期刊>Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy >The "Research Jury Method": The Application of the Jury Trial Model to Evaluating the Validity of Descriptive and Causal Statements about Psychotherapy Process and Outcome

【24h】

The "Research Jury Method": The Application of the Jury Trial Model to Evaluating the Validity of Descriptive and Causal Statements about Psychotherapy Process and Outcome

机译：“研究陪审团方法”：陪审团审判模型在评估心理治疗过程和结果的描述性陈述和因果陈述的有效性上的应用

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy》 |2011年第1期|共页
作者
Arthur C. Bohart; Gayle C. Byock; Karen L. Tallman; Thomas Mackrill;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类 R414;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Trauma Treatment in Young Children with Developmental Disabilities: Applications of the Child-Parent Psychotherapy (CPP) Model to the Cases of "James" and "Juan" [J] . Eliza K. Harley, Irina Zamora, Marian E. Williams, Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy . 2014,第3期

机译：患有发育障碍的幼儿的创伤治疗：儿童父母心理治疗（CPP）模型在“詹姆斯”和“胡安”病例中的应用
2. Jury Trials and Plea Bargaining: A True History. By Mike McConville and Chester L. Mirsky (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005, 364pp. ￡35.00 hb) The Trial on Trial: Volume One—Truth and Due Process. By Antony Duff, Lindsay Farmer, Sandra Marshall and Victor Tadros, eds (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004, 207pp. ￡35.00 hb) [J] . Marny Requa British Journal of Criminology . 2006,第5期

机译：陪审团审判和辩诉交易：真实的历史。迈克·麦康维尔（Mike McConville）和切斯特·L·米尔斯基（Chester L. Mirsky）（牛津：哈特出版社，2005年，364pp。￡ 35.00 hb）审判的审判：第一卷-真相与正当程序。安东尼·达夫（Antony Duff），林赛·法默（Lindsay Farmer），桑德拉·马歇尔（Sandra Marshall）和维克多·塔德罗斯（Victor Tadros）编辑（牛津：哈特出版社，2004，207pp.35.00英镑）
3. Chauvin Jury Instructions Could Determine Trial Outcome [J] . V. JAMES DESIMONE Environment reporter . 2021,第Mara期

机译：Chauvin陪审团指示可以确定试验结果
4. Distributed Belief Revision as Applied Within a Descriptive Model of Jury Deliberations [C] . Aldo Franco Dragoni, Paolo Giorgini, Ephraim Nissan AISB Convention . 2007

机译：分布式信仰修订适用于陪审团审议的描述模型中
5. Multilevel Potential Outcome Models for Causal Inference in Jury Research [D] . Lovis-McMahon, David 2015

机译：陪审团研究中因果推理的多层次潜在结果模型
6. Citizens’ juries in planning research priorities: process engagement and outcome [O] . Rachael Gooberman‐Hill, Jeremy Horwood, Michael Calnan 2008

机译：公民评审委员会在计划研究重点时：流程参与度和成果
7. A Fair and Impartial Jury? The Role of Age in Jury Selection and Trial Outcomes [O] . Anwar, S, Bayer, Patrick, Hjalmarsson, R 2012

机译：公平公正的陪审团？年龄在陪审团选拔和审判结果中的作用
8. Optimal Peremptory Challenges in Trials by Juries: A Bilateral Sequential Process. [R] . Roth, A., Kadane, J. B., DeGroot, M. 1976

机译：陪审团审判中的最佳强制性挑战：双边顺序过程。

The "Research Jury Method": The Application of the Jury Trial Model to Evaluating the Validity of Descriptive and Causal Statements about Psychotherapy Process and Outcome

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅