...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Attitudes and Perceptions about Clinical Guidelines: A Qualitative Study with Spanish Physicians
【24h】

Attitudes and Perceptions about Clinical Guidelines: A Qualitative Study with Spanish Physicians

机译:对临床指南的态度和看法:与西班牙医师进行的定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Clinical guidelines (CGs) are popular for healthcare decision making but their acceptability and use by healthcare providers is influenced by numerous factors. Some of these factors are professional-related, such as knowledge and perceptions of and attitudes toward CGs in general. The aim of our study was to evaluate attitudes and perceptions of Spanish physicians towards CGs. Methods We coordinated six discussion groups with a total of 46 physicians. The participants were drawn from 12 medical specialties from both specialized and primary care. We recorded the sessions and transcribed the content verbatim. We analyzed the data using an approach based on the grounded theory. Results We identified two main constructs that defined the physicians' perceptions towards guidelines: knowledge and usefulness. “Knowledge” defined the theoretical meanings of guidelines, while “Usefulness” referred to the pragmatic approach to guidelines. These constructs were interrelated through a series of categories such as confidence, usability, accessibility, dissemination and formats. Conclusions In our study, the constructs that impacted most on physician's attitudes to clinical guidelines were knowledge and usefulness. The tension between the theoretical and the pragmatic constructs determined the attitudes and how physicians use guidelines. Groups developing guidelines should ask relevant clinical questions and develop implementable and context specific recommendations. Developers should be explicit and consistent in the development and presentation of recommendations.
机译:背景技术临床指南(CGs)在医疗保健决策中很受欢迎,但是医疗保健提供者的接受程度和使用受到许多因素的影响。其中一些因素是与专业相关的,例如总体上对CG的知识和看法以及对CG的态度。我们研究的目的是评估西班牙医生对CG的态度和看法。方法我们协调了六个讨论小组,共46位医生。参与者来自专业和初级保健的12个医学专业。我们记录了会议内容并逐字抄录了内容。我们使用基于扎根理论的方法分析了数据。结果我们确定了两种主要的结构来定义医师对指导的看法:知识和实用性。 “知识”定义了准则的理论含义,而“有用性”指的是准则的实用方法。这些构造通过一系列类别(例如信心,可用性,可访问性,传播和格式)相互关联。结论在我们的研究中,对医师对临床指南的态度影响最大的结构是知识和有用性。理论结构和实际结构之间的张力决定了态度以及医生如何使用指南。制定指南的小组应提出相关的临床问题,并制定可实施的和针对具体情况的建议。开发人员应在建议的制定和陈述中保持明确和一致。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号