首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Medicine >Physical activity levels in adults and older adults 3–4 years after pedometer-based walking interventions: Long-term follow-up of participants from two randomised controlled trials in UK primary care
【24h】

Physical activity levels in adults and older adults 3–4 years after pedometer-based walking interventions: Long-term follow-up of participants from two randomised controlled trials in UK primary care

机译:基于计步器的步行干预后3-4年,成年人和成年人的身体活动水平:英国初级保健中两项随机对照试验的参与者的长期随访

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Physical inactivity is an important cause of noncommunicable diseases. Interventions can increase short-term physical activity (PA), but health benefits require maintenance. Few interventions have evaluated PA objectively beyond 12 months. We followed up two pedometer interventions with positive 12-month effects to examine objective PA levels at 3–4 years. Methods and findings Long-term follow-up of two completed trials: Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation-UP (PACE-UP) 3-arm (postal, nurse support, control) at 3 years and Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation-Lift (PACE-Lift) 2-arm (nurse support, control) at 4 years post-baseline. Randomly selected patients from 10 United Kingdom primary care practices were recruited (PACE-UP: 45–75 years, PACE-Lift: 60–75 years). Intervention arms received 12-week walking programmes (pedometer, handbooks, PA diaries) postally (PACE-UP) or with nurse support (PACE-UP, PACE-Lift). Main outcomes were changes in 7-day accelerometer average daily step counts and weekly time in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) in ≥10-minute bouts in intervention versus control groups, between baseline and 3 years (PACE-UP) and 4 years (PACE-Lift). PACE-UP 3-year follow-up was 67% (681/1,023) (mean age: 59, 64% female), and PACE-Lift 4-year follow-up was 76% (225/298) (mean age: 67, 53% female). PACE-UP 3-year intervention versus control comparisons were as follows: additional steps/day postal +627 (95% CI: 198–1,056), p = 0.004, nurse +670 (95% CI: 237–1,102), p = 0.002; total weekly MVPA in bouts (minutes/week) postal +28 (95% CI: 7–49), p = 0.009, nurse +24 (95% CI: 3–45), p = 0.03. PACE-Lift 4-year intervention versus control comparisons were: +407 (95% CI: ?177–992), p = 0.17 steps/day, and +32 (95% CI: 5–60), p = 0.02 minutes/week MVPA in bouts. Neither trial showed sedentary or wear-time differences. Main study limitation was incomplete follow-up; however, results were robust to missing data sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Intervention participants followed up from both trials demonstrated higher levels of objectively measured PA at 3–4 years than controls, similar to previously reported 12-month trial effects. Pedometer interventions, delivered by post or with nurse support, can help address the public health physical inactivity challenge. Trial registrations PACE-UP isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934 ; PACE-Lift isrctn.com ISRCTN42122561 .
机译:背景缺乏运动是导致非传染性疾病的重要原因。干预可以增加短期的体育锻炼(PA),但健康的好处需要维护。很少有干预措施能够客观评估PA超过12个月的情况。我们跟踪了两种计步器干预措施,这些干预措施具有12个月的积极效果,以检查3-4岁时的客观PA水平。方法和发现两项已完成试验的长期随访:计步器和咨询评估(PACE-UP)3年(手臂,邮政,护士支持,对照)3臂和计步器加速度计咨询评估(PACE-Lift) )基线后4年的2臂(护士支持,控制)。从英国10种初级保健实践中随机选择患者(PACE-UP:45-75岁,PACE-Lift:60-75岁)。干预部门通过邮政(PACE-UP)或在护士的支持下(PACE-UP,PACE-Lift)接受了为期12周的步行训练(计步器,手册,PA日记)。主要结果是干预组和对照组之间在≥10分钟的发作中,中度至剧烈PA(MVPA)的7天加速度计平均每日步数和每周时间的变化,基线和3年之间(PACE-UP)和4年(PACE-Lift)。 PACE随访3年的随访率为67%(681 / 1,023)(平均年龄:59,女性64%),PACE随访4年的随访为76%(225/298)(平均年龄: 67岁,女性占53%)。 PACE-UP 3年干预组与对照组的比较如下:每天增加的额外步骤+627(95%CI:198–1,056),p = 0.004,护士+670(95%CI:237–1,102),p = 0.002;每周总的MVPA(以分钟为单位)(分钟/周),邮政+28(95%CI:7–49),p = 0.009,护士+24(95%CI:3–45),p = 0.03。 PACE-Lift的4年干预与对照组比较为:+407(95%CI:177–9​​92),p = 0.17步/天,和+32(95%CI:5-60),p = 0.02分钟/一周内MVPA反弹。两项试验均未显示久坐或佩戴时间差异。主要研究限制是随访不完全。但是,结果对于缺少数据敏感性分析是可靠的。结论两项试验的随访参与者均显示,在3-4年时客观测量的PA水平高于对照组,与先前报道的12个月试验效果相似。通过邮寄或在护士的支持下进行的计步器干预可以帮助应对公共卫生缺乏身体活动的挑战。试用注册PACE-UP isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934; PACE-Lift isrctn.com ISRCTN42122561。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号