...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Medicine >Reducing the burden of dizziness in middle-aged and older people: A multifactorial, tailored, single-blind randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Reducing the burden of dizziness in middle-aged and older people: A multifactorial, tailored, single-blind randomized controlled trial

机译:减轻中老年人的头晕负担:一项多因素,量身定制的单盲随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Dizziness is common among older people and is associated with a cascade of debilitating symptoms, such as reduced quality of life, depression, and falls. The multifactorial aetiology of dizziness is a major barrier to establishing a clear diagnosis and offering effective therapeutic interventions. Only a few multidisciplinary interventions of dizziness have been conducted to date, all of a pilot nature and none tailoring the intervention to the specific causes of dizziness. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary dizziness assessment followed by a tailored multifaceted intervention would reduce dizziness handicap and self-reported dizziness as well as enhance balance and gait in people aged 50 years and over with dizziness symptoms. Methods and findings We conducted a 6-month, single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial in community-living people aged 50 years and over who reported dizziness in the past year. We excluded individuals currently receiving treatment for their dizziness, those with degenerative neurological conditions including cognitive impairment, those unable to walk 20 meters, and those identified at baseline assessment with conditions that required urgent treatment. Our team of geriatrician, vestibular neuroscientist, psychologist, exercise physiologist, study coordinator, and baseline assessor held case conferences fortnightly to discuss and recommend appropriate therapy (or therapies) for each participant, based on their multidisciplinary baseline assessments. A total of 305 men and women aged 50 to 92 years (mean [SD] age: 67.8 [8.3] years; 62% women) were randomly assigned to either usual care (control; n = 151) or to a tailored, multifaceted intervention (n = 154) comprising one or more of the following: a physiotherapist-led vestibular rehabilitation programme (35% [n = 54]), an 8-week internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) (19% [n = 29]), a 6-month Otago home-based exercise programme (24% [n = 37]), and/or medical management (40% [n = 62]). We were unable to identify a cause of dizziness in 71 participants (23% of total sample). Primary outcome measures comprised dizziness burden measured with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) score, frequency of dizziness episodes recorded with monthly calendars over the 6-month follow-up, choice-stepping reaction time (CSRT), and gait variability. Data from 274 participants (90%; 137 per group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At trial completion, the DHI scores in the intervention group (pre and post mean [SD]: 25.9 [19.2] and 20.4 [17.7], respectively) were significantly reduced compared with the control group (pre and post mean [SD]: 23.0 [15.8] and 21.8 [16.4]), when controlling for baseline scores (mean [95% CI] difference between groups [baseline adjusted]: ?3.7 [?6.2 to ?1.2]; p = 0.003). There were no significant between-group differences in dizziness episodes (relative risk [RR] [95% CI]: 0.87 [0.65 to 1.17]; p = 0.360), CSRT performance (mean [95% CI] difference between groups [baseline adjusted]: ?15 [?40 to 10]; p = 0.246), and step-time variability during gait (mean [95% CI] difference between groups [baseline adjusted]: ?0.001 [?0.002 to 0.001]; p = 0.497). No serious intervention-related adverse events occurred. Study limitations included the low initial dizziness severity of the participants and the only fair uptake of the falls clinic (medical management) and the CBT interventions. Conclusions A multifactorial tailored approach for treating dizziness was effective in reducing dizziness handicap in community-living people aged 50 years and older. No difference was seen on the other primary outcomes. Our findings therefore support the implementation of individualized, multifaceted evidence-based therapies to reduce self-perceived disability associated with dizziness in middle-aged and older people. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000379819 .
机译:背景技术头晕在老年人中很常见,并伴随着一系列使人衰弱的症状,例如生活质量下降,抑郁和跌倒。头晕的多因素病因是建立明确诊断和提供有效治疗干预措施的主要障碍。迄今为止,仅进行了几项头晕的多学科干预,所有这些都是试验性质的,并且没有针对头晕的具体原因量身定制的干预措施。在这里,我们旨在检验以下假设:多学科头晕评估随后进行有针对性的多方面干预将减少头晕症状和自我报告的头晕,并增强50岁及以上有头晕症状的人的平衡和步态。方法和发现我们对过去一年报告头晕的50岁及以上的社区居住者进行了为期6个月,单盲,平行分组的随机对照试验。我们排除了目前因头晕而接受治疗的患者,患有包括认知障碍在内的退化性神经系统疾病的患者,无法步行20米的患者以及在基线评估中发现的需要紧急治疗的患者。我们的老年科医生,前庭神经科学家,心理学家,运动生理学家,研究协调员和基线评估者团队每两周举行一次案例会议,以根据他们的多学科基线评估为每位参与者讨论并推荐适当的治疗方法。共有305名年龄在50至92岁之间的男性和女性(平均[SD]年龄:67.8 [8.3]岁; 62%的女性)被随机分配至常规护理(对照组; n = 151)或量身定制的多方面干预措施(n = 154),包括以下一项或多项:物理治疗师主导的前庭康复计划(35%[n = 54]),基于互联网的8周认知行为疗法(CBT)(19%[n = 29]),为期6个月的奥塔哥家庭锻炼计划(24%[n = 37])和/或医疗管理(40%[n = 62])。我们无法确定71名参与者(占总样本的23%)头晕的原因。主要结局指标包括通过头晕障碍量表(DHI)得分测量的头晕负担,在6个月的随访中每月日历记录的头晕发作频率,选择步伐反应时间(CSRT)和步态变异性。意向性治疗分析包括来自274名参与者(90%;每组137名)的数据。在试验完成时,与对照组相比,干预组的DHI评分(分别为均值[SD]:25.9 [19.2]和20.4 [17.7])和对照组(均值[SD]:23.0)显着降低。 [15.8]和21.8 [16.4]),当控制基线得分时(各组之间的平均[95%CI]差异[基线调整] :? 3.7 [?6.2至?1.2]; p = 0.003)。组间头晕发作之间无显着差异(相对危险度[RR] [95%CI]:0.87 [0.65至1.17]; p = 0.360),CSRT表现(组间平均[95%CI]差异[基线调整] :? 15 [?40到10]; p = 0.246),步态时步长变化(各组之间的平均[95%CI]差异[基线调整] :? 0.001 [?0.002到0.001]; p = 0.497) )。没有发生与干预相关的严重不良事件。研究的局限性包括参与者最初的头晕严重程度较低,以及跌倒诊所(医疗管理)和CBT干预措施的唯一合理摄取。结论:针对头晕的多因素量身定制方法可有效减少50岁以上社区居民的头晕障碍。其他主要结局未见差异。因此,我们的研究结果支持实施个性化,多方面的循证疗法,以减少中老年人与眩晕相关的自我感觉障碍。试验注册澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12612000379819。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号