首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Medicine >Is the Current Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Really Evidence Based?
【24h】

Is the Current Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Really Evidence Based?

机译:当前对严重脓毒症和感染性休克的治疗是否真的基于证据?

获取原文
           

摘要

Evidence-based medicine (EBM), a process of accurately assessing and integrating the weight carried by various levels of available evidence, (e.g., randomized controlled trials [RCTs], case-control studies, case series, and expert opinion) has become the cornerstone of good medical practice. The RCT is considered the “gold-standard” of EBM, but, while the RCT may indeed be the most statistically unbiased method of assessing an intervention, it can also have limitations and must be correctly interpreted, aided by other forms of evidence.
机译:循证医学(EBM)是一种准确评估和整合各种可用证据水平(例如,随机对照试验[RCT],病例对照研究,病例系列和专家意见)所承担的权重的过程,良好医疗实践的基石。 RCT被认为是EBM的“黄金标准”,但是,尽管RCT确实确实是评估干预措施的最统计上无偏的方法,但它也可能有局限性,必须借助其他形式的证据加以正确解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号