首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Medicine >Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward
【24h】

Birth “Out-of-Hours”: An Evaluation of Obstetric Practice and Outcome According to the Presence of Senior Obstetricians on the Labour Ward

机译:“非工作时间”的出生:根据高级产科医生在劳动病房中的存在评估产科实践和结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Concerns have been raised that a lack of senior obstetricians (“consultants”) on the labour ward outside normal hours may lead to worse outcomes among babies born during periods of reduced cover. Methods and Findings We carried out a multicentre cohort study using data from 19 obstetric units in the United Kingdom between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2013 to examine whether rates of obstetric intervention and outcome change “out-of-hours,” i.e., when consultants are not providing dedicated, on-site labour ward cover. At the 19 hospitals, obstetric rotas ranged from 51 to 106 h of on-site labour ward cover per week. There were 87,501 singleton live births during the year, and 55.8% occurred out-of-hours. Women who delivered out-of-hours had slightly lower rates of intrapartum caesarean section (CS) (12.7% versus 13.4%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90 to 0.98) and instrumental delivery (15.6% versus 17.0%, adj. OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) than women who delivered at times of on-site labour ward cover. There was some evidence that the severe perineal tear rate was reduced in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries (3.3% versus 3.6%, adj. OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00). There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference between out-of-hours and “in-hours” deliveries in the rate of babies with a low Apgar score at 5 min (1.33% versus 1.25%, adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.21) or low cord pH (0.94% versus 0.82%; adjusted OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.31). Key study limitations include the potential for bias by indication, the reliance upon an organisational measure of consultant presence, and a non-random sample of maternity units. Conclusions There was no difference in the rate of maternal and neonatal morbidity according to the presence of consultants on the labour ward, with the possible exception of a reduced rate of severe perineal tears in out-of-hours vaginal deliveries. Fewer women had operative deliveries out-of-hours. Taken together, the available evidence provides some reassurance that the current organisation of maternity care in the UK allows for good planning and risk management. However there is a need for more robust evidence on the quality of care afforded by different models of labour ward staffing.
机译:背景技术已经引起关注的是,在正常工作时间以外在劳动病房缺少高级产科医生(“顾问”)可能会导致在覆盖率降低期间出生的婴儿的结局恶化。方法和研究结果我们采用了来自英国19个产科部门的数据,于2012年4月1日至2013年3月31日进行了一项多中心队列研究,以检查产科干预率和预后是否在“非工作时间”发生变化,即何时顾问没有提供专门的现场劳动病房保险。在这19家医院中,产科轮诊的现场劳动病房周转时间为51到106 h。全年有87,501例单胎活产,其中55.8%为非工作时间产。非工作时间分娩的妇女的剖腹产剖腹产(CS)率较低(12.7%对13.4%,调整后的优势比[OR]为0.94; 95%的置信区间[CI]为0.90至0.98)和器械分娩(15.6)相比于现场劳动病房覆盖时分娩的妇女,这一数字为%对17.0%,经调整后为0.92; 95%CI为0.89至0.96)。有证据表明,在非工作时间的阴道分娩中严重的会阴撕裂率降低了(3.3%对3.6%,调整后为0.92; 95%CI为0.85至1.00)。没有证据表明在5分钟内Apgar得分低的婴儿的正常工作时间与“正常工作时间”之间的统计差异显着(1.33%对1.25%,调整后的OR为1.07; 95%CI为0.95到1.21)或脐带pH值低(0.94%对0.82%;调整为OR 1.12; 95%CI 0.96至1.31)。关键的研究局限性包括潜在的适应症,对顾问存在的组织措施的依赖以及对产妇单位的非随机抽样。结论根据产房顾问的存在,孕产妇和新生儿的发病率没有差异,可能的例外是在非工作时间阴道分娩中严重会阴撕裂的发生率降低。很少有妇女在非工作时间进行手术分娩。综上所述,现有证据为英国目前的产妇保健组织提供良好的计划和风险管理提供了一定的保证。但是,需要有更强有力的证据来证明不同类型的劳动病房人员配备所提供的护理质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号